· Public charity
BHHS Legacy Foundation
BHHS Legacy Foundation's mission is to enhance the quality of life and health of those we serve.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 103 grants below total $3,758,293 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,237,836 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $479,543 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $150k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $869k
- $50k–250k36 grants · $2.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Delivering Dreams of Arizona | $225,000 |
| Arizona Basketball Coaches Association Inc | $150,000 |
| Parents of Addicted Loved Ones | $150,000 |
| Catholic Charities Community Services Inc | $140,000 |
| Check for a Lump | $100,000 |
| PBHMC | $80,000 |
| Amanda Hope Rainbow Angels | $80,000 |
| Community Pride Advocates Inc | $77,596 |
| DAMES Charities Inc | $77,500 |
| Justa Center Inc | $75,000 |
| Bullhead Regional Food Bank Inc | $75,000 |
| Brighter Way Institute | $75,000 |
| AZ Impact for Good | $75,000 |
| Hope Community Services | $75,000 |
| Fiesta Events Inc | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $6.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
115 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $688k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DDDelivering Dreams of Arizona6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +242%
- FPFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX3× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +38%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLORADO RIVER6× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +126% · 44% of their budget
Funded once
- HOHospice of the Valleyone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +14%
- ACALANO CLUB OF BULLHEAD CITYone grant, 2021 · $260k
- NONEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACCESS TO HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $244k · revenue +153%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.
Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tanner Community Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Saving Animals in Need Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
199 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 199 of the 229 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Delivering Dreams of Arizona ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLORADO RIVER ↗
- Who funds PBHMC Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BASKETBALL COACHES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BACK TO SCHOOL CLOTHING DRIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FIESTA EVENTS INC ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds Rosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds NOTMYKID ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PRIDE ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTER WAY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS ↗
- Who funds ALS Arizona ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA DENTAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Diana Gregory Outreach Services ↗
- Who funds Kids in Focus ↗
- Who funds VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDSPLAY INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALANO CLUB OF BULLHEAD CITY ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK ↗
- Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACCESS TO HEALTH ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
- Who funds Tonto Creek Camp ↗
- Who funds Midwestern University ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Care 4 the Caregivers ↗
- Who funds Check For a Lump ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · John F Long Foundation Inc · Fiesta Events Inc · Valley of the Sun United Way · The Board of Visitors · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization BHHS Legacy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to BHHS Legacy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to BHHS Legacy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.