· Private foundation
The Fine and Greenwald Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k56 grants · $229k
- $10k–50k131 grants · $2.1M
- $50k–250k26 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+3 grants · $900k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $300,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $300,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND | $200,000 |
| THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| MIAMI WATERKEEPER | $200,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH EAST | $100,000 |
| UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS | $100,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA | $100,000 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $80,000 |
| EAST END FOOD INSTITUTE | $75,000 |
| CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $70,000 |
| NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC | $60,000 |
| PROJECT MOST | $55,000 |
| FOOD AND WATER WATCH | $50,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
190 repeat relationships: 162 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $474k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- OYOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +202%
- TDTHE DISABILITY FUND INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +57%
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +110%
Funded once
- SFSEARCH FOR COMMON GROUNDone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +8%
- BPBOREALIS PHILANTHROPYone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +13%
- EEarthworksone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -3%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…
Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…
How this is measured
214 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 214 of the 278 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE DISABILITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds JACK MARTIN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds 350ORG ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Imperfect Family Foundation · Kate Cassidy Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Daniel L Nir & Jill E Braufman Family Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Fine and Greenwald Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fine and Greenwald Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Farm Aid Inc: 100% of income from government
- Refugee Assistance Alliance Inc: 92% of income from government
- Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
- Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
- Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc: 19% of income from government
- Urban Oasis Project Inc: 12% of income from government
- City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
- Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
- Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
- Care Elementary School Inc: 8% of income from government
- Farm Share Inc: 6% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
- Beacon College Prep Inc: 5% of income from government
- Public Justice Center Inc: 5% of income from government
- Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc: 2% of income from government
- Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
- Real Organic Project Inc: 1% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc: 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Fine and Greenwald Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Fine and Greenwald Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Fine and Greenwald’s filings →