Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Financial Health Network Inc

The financial health network is a trusted resource for business leaders, policymakers, and innovators united in a mission to improve the financial health of their customers, employees, and communities.

$25k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.

Community Improvement$1.1MHuman Services$627kYouth Development$325kCrime & Legal$325kPhilanthropy$272kEducation$165kPublic Safety & Disaster$151kHousing & Shelter$127kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILVUR SERVICES LLC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $552k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREENPATH FINANCIAL WELLNESS: $151k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $50k → 16%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC: $77k → 14%THE FINANCIAL CLINIC: $50k → 20%IRC'S CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY: $50k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $125k → 17%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
MD
DE
AZ
DC
LA
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$736k · 16 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
50

Total granted

$736k
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+1%

Still filing today

25%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $167k · revenue +90%
  • EI
    EARN INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $132k · revenue +131%
  • NT
    NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $100k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • GI
    GREENPATH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $151k · revenue +5%
  • GIVEDIRECTLY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -32%
  • M
    MyPathgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
2
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
3
Center for Responsible Lending

Promoting financial fairness and economic opportunity for all, ending abusive lending practices.

Crime & Legal
4
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
5
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
6
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
7
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
8
The Louisville Urban League Inc

As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.

Human Services
9
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
10
Finreglab Inc

Finreglab is a d.c.-based research organization working at the intersection of financial innovation and public policy. our mission is to advance technology and data use to help people and small businesses manage their financial lives,…

Science & Tech
11
Ascendus Inc

Ascendus empowers low-to-moderate income business owners through access to capital and financial education.

Community Improvement
12
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Pie for Providers Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Social ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Jewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/66
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,499

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
19/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Onward — $178,200 · OtherOnwardMyPath — $150,000 · OtherMyPathEDQUITY INC — $150,000 · OtherEDQUITY INCPIE FOR PROVIDERS LTD — $100,000 · OtherPIE FOR PROVIDERS LTDNEBRASKA EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVE — $90,000 · OtherNEBRASKA EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVELATIN UNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSN — $76,650 · OtherGreater Birmingham Ministries — $75,000 · OtherRESTORATIVE STRATEGIES LLC — $65,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITY — $60,000 · OtherWOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR A SECURE RETIREMENT — $75,000 · Other+37 more — $561,426 · Other+37 moreGREENPATH INC — $150,500 · Human ServicesGREENPATH INCGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INCHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $125,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENTHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC — $76,650 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SE…Change Machine — $50,000 · Human ServicesChange MachineHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIET…URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY — $50,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX C…IRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesIRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMI…UPSOLVE INC — $125,000 · Crime & LegalUPSOLVE IN…finEQUITY Inc — $100,000 · Crime & LegalfinEQUITY …THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $50,000 · Crime & LegalTHE ANTI-R…JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF LOUISIANA — $50,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE AN…EARN INC — $132,000 · PhilanthropyEARN INCTHE FLAGSTONE INITIATIVE INC — $90,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FLAGS…THE DIRECTORS COUNCIL — $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DIREC…LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $166,650 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INI…The Workers Lab — $50,000 · Community ImprovementThe Worke…ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementACCION OP…RESOURCES LEGACY FUND — $110,000 · EnvironmentNEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC — $100,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,581,276Human Services$702,150Crime & Legal$325,000Philanthropy$272,000Community Improvement$266,650Environment$110,000Arts & Culture$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $166,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPATH INC — $150,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMyPath — $150,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetEARN INC — $132,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $125,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPSOLVE INC — $125,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetRESOURCES LEGACY FUND — $110,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetfinEQUITY Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPIE FOR PROVIDERS LTD — $100,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FLAGSTONE INITIATIVE INC — $90,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNEBRASKA EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVE — $90,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLATIN UNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSN — $76,650 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC — $76,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Birmingham Ministries — $75,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetWOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR A SECURE RETIREMENT — $75,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChange Machine — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Workers Lab — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCREDIT BUILDERS ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJustine Petersen Housing And Reinvestment Corporation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF LOUISIANA — $50,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTHE DIRECTORS COUNCIL — $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCOMPASS WORKING CAPITAL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSUMER ACTION — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMONEYTHINK — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wells Fargo FoundationThe Prudential Founda…IdeoorgCiti FoundationAnnie E Casey Foundat…Robin Hood FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…Capital One Foundatio…WK Kellogg FoundationTides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Fidelity Foundation
Wells Fargo FoundationMN18.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · The Prudential Foundation · Ideoorg · Citi Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Capital One Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Fidelity Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Financial Health Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Urban League of Essex County — 20% of income from government
  • Compass Working Capital Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines