Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Everychild Foundation

To raise funds for distribution to entities and organizations devoted to improving the prospects and easing the suffering of children affected by conditions like poverty, illness, injury, abuse, and neglect.

$656k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$556k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$2.4MHuman Services$2.1MHousing & Shelter$1.4MYouth Development$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.0MEducation$375kCommunity Improvement$250kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $556k
$555,539
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vision to Learn$555,539
College Match$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Richstone Family Center: $452k → 14%Richstone Family Center: $373k → 14%Richstone Family Center: $176k → 14%1736 Family Crisis Center: $27k → 14%Covenant House California: $250k → 14%Jennesse Center Inc: $250k → 14%Adobe Communities: $250k → 14%United Friends of the Children: $125k → 14%Wellnest: $125k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 4 repeat orgs$5.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
29

Total granted

$3.5M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $656k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RICHSTONE CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +54%
  • HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +74%
  • LM
    LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $756k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • DH
    DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +50%
  • AC
    ABODE COMMUNITY HOUSING
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +7%
  • JC
    Jenesse Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +71%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
2
Hillsides

We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…

Human Services
3
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
4
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
5
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
6
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
7
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
8
Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Our Vision is to enhance the educational and economic well-being of the people we serve by means of direct human services, advocacy, and referrals.Our Mission is to save lives, unite families, and protect the community through addiction…

—
9
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
10
Hathaway-Sycamores Child and Family Services

Sycamores nonprofit health organization whose mission is cultivating hope and resilience to enrich the well-being of children, families, and communities through out los angeles and riverside counties.

Human Services
11
Optimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc

Our mission is to support children/youth, and their families, in and at-risk of foster care, to build hope and achieve bright futures through wellness, education, relationships, and career focused services and resources.

Health
12
Jwch Institute Inc

The specific purposes of this organization are:(a) to provide outpatient primary health service in underserved areas and/or for medically underserved populations as a community clinic. (b) to develop, promote, and manage health care…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Antelope Valley Partners for Health and the most unlike its peers is Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%3%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr10%37%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr10%30%35–55yr12%26%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
16%
7,867/49,782

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE — $1,000,000 · HealthDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICEThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services — $750,000 · HealthThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Hous…VISION TO LEARN — $555,539 · HealthVISION TO LEARNChild & Family Center — $250,000 · HealthChild & Family CenterCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $250,000 · HealthCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTEHARBOR COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $125,000 · Health+2 more — $50,000 · HealthTHE RICHSTONE CENTER INC — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesTHE RICHSTONE CENTER INCABODE COMMUNITY HOUSING — $250,000 · Human ServicesABODE COMMUNITY HOUSINGJenesse Center Inc — $250,000 · Human ServicesJenesse Center IncCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $250,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIAUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $125,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHIL…Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness — $125,000 · Human ServicesWellnest Emotional Health …+1 more — $27,143 · Human ServicesNew Village Girls Academy — $250,000 · OtherNew Village Gir…Center for Juvenile Law and Policy — $243,587 · OtherCenter for Juve…PACIFIC CLINICS — $125,000 · OtherPACIFIC CLINICSPEACE OVER VIOLENCE — $125,000 · OtherPEACE OVER VIOL…ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $125,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR CH…LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $125,000 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSI…BABY2BABY — $100,000 · OtherBABY2BABY+4 more — $100,000 · Other+4 moreLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $756,413 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOU…SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $250,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEE…COLLEGE MATCH — $100,000 · EducationCOLLEGE MATCH+1 more — $25,000 · EducationHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUS…+2 more — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $250,000 · Community ImprovementCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $125,000 · Civil Rights
Health$2,980,539Human Services$2,027,143Other$1,193,587Education$1,131,413Youth Development$1,050,000Community Improvement$250,000Civil Rights$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE RICHSTONE CENTER INC — $1,000,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $1,000,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $756,413 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services — $750,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetVISION TO LEARN — $555,539 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetJenesse Center Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetChild & Family Center — $250,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $250,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $250,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $250,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS — $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARBOR COMMUNITY CLINIC INC — $125,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $125,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $125,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $125,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $125,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWellnest Emotional Health & Wellness — $125,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBABY2BABY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetExtraordinary Families — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationCalifornia Community …S Mark Taper Foundati…The Rose Hills Founda…The Annenberg Foundat…Shelter Partnership I…Baby2babyUnited Way IncKaiser Foundation Hos…The Ahmanson Foundati…Conrad N Hilton Found…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA37.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Baby2baby · United Way Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Ahmanson Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Everychild Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines