Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Elsie Procter Van Buren Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Philanthropy$3.7MFood & Nutrition$1.0MCivil Rights$468kEnvironment$425kInternational$425kPublic Benefit$390kCrime & Legal$248kReligion$191kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $295k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVE DIRECTLY$30,000
FEEDING AMERICA$30,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$30,000
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE-CTR FOR EXPDG VIEWPOINTS$25,000
MASS INC$25,000
RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$20,000
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$20,000
VERMONT FOOD BANK$20,000
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA$15,000
ATRIUM SCHOOL ATRIUM FUND$15,000
NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORP$15,000
NEW BEDFORD LIGHT$10,000
EVERYDAY BOSTON$10,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $10k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 10%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $10k → 14%DELIVERING GOOD: $10k → 17%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $5k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $5k → 14%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $10k → 16%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 16%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING AND SHELTER ALLIANCE: $10k → 16%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING AND SHELTER ALLIANCE: $5k → 16%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 59 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

59 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
60

Total granted

$3.2M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+25%

Still filing today

81%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    6× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +77%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $155k · revenue +21%
  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $155k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • CP
    CATHERINE & PHIL BYE'S DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $3.7M
  • GG
    Ground Game Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -56%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
10
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
11
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
12
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delivering Good Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Women & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/96
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,469

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/93
Grantees still filing
71/93
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHERINE & PHIL BYE'S DONOR ADVISED FUND — $3,682,871 · OtherCATHERINE & PHIL BYE'S DONOR ADVISED FUND+71 more — $1,769,500 · Other+71 moreFeeding America — $300,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding A…RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $130,000 · Food & NutritionRHODE ISL…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $75,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL A…CITY HARVEST INC — $60,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARV…VERMONT FOODBANK — $30,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $45,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $155,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $60,000 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $57,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $45,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $30,000 · InternationalALIGHT — $25,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $25,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $20,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $20,000 · International+7 more — $60,000 · InternationalREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $115,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION — $115,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $60,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $50,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $40,000 · Civil Rights+4 more — $45,000 · Civil RightsENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $135,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE — $40,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $30,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION — $15,000 · Environment+6 more — $45,000 · EnvironmentOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $140,000 · Public BenefitGround Game Fund — $100,000 · Public BenefitGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $20,000 · Human ServicesMASSACHUSETTS HOUSING & SHELTER ALLIANCE — $15,000 · Human ServicesMASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator — $10,000 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT — $10,000 · Human ServicesDELIVERING GOOD INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$5,452,371Food & Nutrition$640,000International$497,500Civil Rights$495,000Environment$305,000Public Benefit$240,000Human Services$210,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFeeding America — $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $155,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $155,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $140,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $130,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGround Game Fund — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEveryday Boston Inc — $65,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetDC Greens Inc — $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $57,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIDESHARE 2 VOTE AWARE — $45,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAWYERS FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK — $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE FOR A NEW COMMONWEALTH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONADNOCK AREA TRANSITIONAL SHELTER — $20,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetCOALITION FOR DC REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS EDUCATION FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Education Opportunity Network Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPOONFULS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncEastern Bank Foundati…Amalgamated Charitabl…Silicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincJewish Communal FundAmerican Tower Corpor…National Philanthropi…Greater Washington Co…New Venture FundTides FoundationThe Robert Wood Johns…
Boston Foundation IncMA21.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Jewish Communal Fund · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Greater Washington Community Foundation · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Elsie Procter Van Buren Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition — 37% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
  • New England Innocence Project — 12% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Documentary Educational Resources Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Elsie Procter Van Buren Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Elsie Procter Van Buren Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines