· Private foundation
The Dickson Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k112 grants · $173k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $411k
- $50k–250k33 grants · $2.9M
- $250k+1 grant · $301k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NOVANT HEALTH PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION | $301,000 |
| LEES MCRAE COLLEGE | $201,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $200,000 |
| NC STATE UNIVERSITY | $127,500 |
| HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE CHARLOTTE REGION | $127,000 |
| COALITION FOR LIBERTY | $125,000 |
| WING HAVEN FOUNDATION | $121,000 |
| ELON UNIVERSITY | $106,000 |
| SOUTHMINSTER | $105,000 |
| CENTRAL PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $103,000 |
| CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN | $102,000 |
| DILWORTH CENTER | $101,000 |
| APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FDN | $101,000 |
| CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| FFTC- HUGH MCCOLL PARK | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
203 repeat relationships — 147 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $809k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Davidson College4× · 2021–2024 · $728k · revenue +52%- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE4× · 2021–2024 · $500k · revenue +22%
- SISOUTHMINSTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $415k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- BABELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +35%
- HFHOPEWAY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $200k
- PMPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…
Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.
Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.
Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Charlotte christian school is a christ-centered, college preparatory school, equipping and developing students to effectively integrate biblical truth and learning nto their daily lives and to impact the culture for christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Richard Hampton Jenrette Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
141 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 141 of the 378 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COALITION FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
- Who funds Davidson College ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHMINSTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dilworth Center for Chemical Dependency ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Wing Haven Foundation Inc DBA Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE CHARLOTTE REGION ↗
- Who funds Sullenberger Aviation Museum ↗
- Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds DOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds HopeWay Foundation ↗
- Who funds Charlotte Neuroscience Foundation DBA Memory and Movement Charlotte ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE LYNNWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Heart Math Tutoring Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Dowd Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Philip L Van Every Foundation · Foundation for the Charlotte Jewish Community · The Presbyterian Hospital · Ibm International Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Dickson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Dickson Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Dickson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.