· Public charity
The Community Preservation Corporation
To combat community deterioration, promote the general welfare, and lessen the burdens of government by providing debt and/or equity financing for low & moderate income housing.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $225,434 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $372,214 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $146,780 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $205k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE | $35,000 |
| HUDSON VALLEY PATTERN FOR PROGRESS | $25,700 |
| WESTHAB INC | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC | $19,984 |
| NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING | $19,250 |
| NORTHEAST SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ASSOC | $15,000 |
| SETTLEMENT HOUSING FUND INC | $15,000 |
| UHAB INC | $10,000 |
| CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING | $10,000 |
| URBAN LAND INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| MHANY MANAGEMENT INC | $10,000 |
| ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| CITY FUTURES INC CENTER FOR AN URBAN FUTURE | $7,500 |
| AMERICA SCORES NEW YORK | $7,500 |
| LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N9× · 2017–2025 · $242k · revenue +84%
- NYNEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE INC7× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +26%
- SHSETTLEMENT HOUSING FUND INC5× · 2018–2025 · $110k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- RHRESTORED HOMES HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATIONone grant, 2019 · $2.0M · revenue -5%
- NCNY CHARITIESone grant, 2017 · $49k
- HCHARLEM CONGREGATIONS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT INCone grant, 2018 · $16k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Housing partnership development corporation functions to provide available low and moderate cost housing in the new york metro area through new housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, as well as the revitalization and…
The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…
The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…
The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…
See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…
NeighborWorks Rochester collaborates with people and partners to strengthen, sustain and promote city neighborhoods. Our services are available to a wide spectrum of the community, including existing and potential homeowners, tenants and…
Support housing cooperatives and condominiums
See Schedule O.To promote the development and operation of affordable housing for low-income residents throughout New York State through the dissemination of information to the general public and affordable housing industry professionals…
Neighborhood housing services of new york city (nhsnyc), through lending, financial literacy, and housing counseling services, empowers disadvantaged low and moderate-income new yorkers to purchase and preserve affordable housing…
Nyaa provides services to landlords including computerized rent registration of rent stabilized apartments with the new york state division of housing and community renewal in compliance with nys & nyc laws & regulations.
The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…
Long island partnership clt housing development fund company, inc. (lipclt) was established to provide housing within nassau and suffolk counties in new york for "persons of low income", as defined in any federal or state low income…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Action Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RESTORED HOMES HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK HOUSING CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds SETTLEMENT HOUSING FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds MHANY MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Westhab Inc ↗
- Who funds HOUSING ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds New York State Association for Affordable Housing ↗
- Who funds URBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE (U-HAB) INC ↗
- Who funds MID-HUDSON PATTERN FOR PROGRESSINC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SCORES ↗
- Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE ROOM INC ↗
- Who funds CITY FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL PROPERTIES INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORTIVE HOUSING NETWORK OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds PathStone Foundation ↗
- Who funds BANANA KELLY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LENDERS ↗
- Who funds Community Design Center Rochester ↗
- Who funds University Neighborhood Housing Program Inc ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NYC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN NEW ROCHELLE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NEW YORK CITY AND WESTCHERSTER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CONGREGATIONS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds VINCENT DEPAUL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Northeast Sustainable Energy Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN DAYTOP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST NICKS ALLIANCE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Td Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Center for New York City Neighborhoods Inc · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Community Preservation Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.