ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

Q: How much did ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT grant in FY2023?

ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT reported 8 grants totaling $242,750 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Q: Where is ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT based?

ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT is based in NY.

To support community development in low and moderate income neighborhoods of New York City by providing training and program support to community based groups that work to build and preserve affordable housing.

$243k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$55k

Largest

01What you fund

0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Community Improvement$1.0MHuman Services$635kHousing & Shelter$358kCrime & Legal$245kEducation$53kEmployment$43kCivil Rights$23kOther$406k

02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k5 grants · $125k
$50k–250k2 grants · $110k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$54,750
COOPER SQUARE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$54,750
BROOKLYN LEVEL UP$30,000
NORTHWEST BRONX COMMUNITY CLERGY$30,000
ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION$24,750
REMA4US INC$24,750
YEMENI AMERICAN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATI$15,750
COMMONWISE EDUCATION INC$8,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $635k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 13%. 97% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.1M · 19 repeat orgs$662k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.1M

$559k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

+107%

Still filing today

95%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationCrime & LegalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PA
Public Allies Inc
3× · 2018–2021 · $501k · revenue +2%
CC
Chhaya Community Development Corp
6× · 2018–2023 · $172k · revenue +399%
CS
Cooper Square Community Development Committee
5× · 2018–2023 · $142k · revenue +46%

Funded once

MM
MHANY Management Incgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +106%
EE
Evergreen Exchangegraduated
one grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +109%
CV
COMMUNITY VOICES HEARD
one grant, 2022 · $43k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter

Central Brooklyn Economic Development Corp

Develop affordable housing

Education

Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunites for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement

Caribbean American Center of New York Inc

To provide community services.

—

The Long Island City Partnership Inc

A neighborhood development organization for long island city, queens.

Community Improvement

North Brooklyn Development Corp

North brooklyn development corporation was formed to assist,promote, encourage and stimulate the construction and/or rehabilitation of residential buildings in blighted or underdeveloped areas of brooklyn,ny

Human Services

The New York Urban League Inc

To improve social and economic conditions for those in underserved ethnic communities

—

Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development

—

Northern Manhattan Coalition

to educate, defend and protect the rights of immigrants. Recognized by the Board of Immigration Appeals, NMCIR is committed to expanding access to legal immigration services, participating in policy making and community organizing.

Community Improvement

Preserving City Neighborhoods

The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…

Housing & Shelter

Sebco Development Inc

Sebco development, inc. is a community based housing development company located in the south bronx of new york city. it has developed more than 6,000 units of subsidized housing. it continues to develop housing, as well as providing…

Housing & Shelter

Nyc Nowc Inc

The NYC Network of Worker Cooperatives is dedicated to sharing and cultivating the educational, financial, and technical resources of its members and supporting the growth of worker cooperatives for social and economic justice. We offer…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascendant Neighborhood Development and the most unlike its peers is Greenpoint Manufacturing and Design. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/52

the rest of the field

10%

4,265/44,485

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

45/47

Grantees still filing

41/47

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Community Improvement$1,013,500Human Services$635,157Other$406,000Housing & Shelter$357,500Crime & Legal$244,750Education$53,250Employment$42,500Civil Rights$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY50.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · United Way of New York City · North Star Fund Inc · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · New York Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Fund for the City of New York Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BROOKLYN LEVEL UP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 83.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 851148315 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BROOKLYN LEVEL UP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development?

Find your warmest path to Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development?

More from the funding graph

ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD & HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development?

More from the funding graph