· Community foundation
The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc
The community foundation of the holland/zeeland area seeks to ensure that our community thrives today, tomorrow, and forever by building our community's endowment to support high impact charitable projects, helping donors achieve their charitable goals, and leading and partnering in community-level initiatives.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE HOLLAND/ZEELAND AREA INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 217 grants below total $12,565,542 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,238,938 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,673,396 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $299k
- $10k–50k114 grants · $2.6M
- $50k–250k52 grants · $5.2M
- $250k+8 grants · $4.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ODC NETWORK | $1,294,307 |
| MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY | $983,000 |
| GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $490,500 |
| LAKESHORE ADVANTAGE FOUNDATION | $432,575 |
| LAKESHORE ADVANTAGE | $378,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND | $294,282 |
| CASA-CHILDREN'S AFTER SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT | $292,998 |
| GATEWAY MISSION | $289,288 |
| OAKLAND CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH | $242,327 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE | $232,331 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $225,921 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MICHIGAN GREAT LAKES | $211,000 |
| MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY | $207,565 |
| PILLAR CHURCH | $181,822 |
| CRITTER BARN | $165,578 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
266 repeat relationships — 183 still active in FY2024, 83 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ONODC NETWORK8× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +428%
- CBCRITTER BARN8× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +463% · 69% of their budget
- HCHOPE COLLEGE8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +37%
Funded once
- WMWEST MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION INSTITUTEone grant, 2021 · $804k · revenue +7% · 29% of their budget
- MMMichigan Masonic Charitable Foundationone grant, 2021 · $623k · revenue -55%
- WMWEST MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $323k · revenue +84% · 34% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
The west coast chamber exists to be a catalyst for business growth and development, a convener of leaders and influencers, and a champion for a thriving community.
Motivated by christ's love, we engage people as they experience and embrace their god-given potential.
The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gilda's Club Grand Rapids and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
304 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 304 of the 429 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CRITTER BARN ↗
- Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE ADVANTAGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND ↗
- Who funds RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER OTTAWA COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MICHIGAN GREAT LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN COMMONS ↗
- Who funds Michigan Masonic Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE MINISTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY ON A HILL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE NONPROFIT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Society for Christian Instruction Zeeland ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Frey Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Community Foundation for Muskegon County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Key West Film Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.