· Private foundation
Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k97 grants · $245k
- $10k–50k56 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k35 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL | $233,334 |
| MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES | $175,000 |
| PINE REST FOUNDATION | $167,000 |
| DAVID'S HOUSE MINISTRIES | $125,000 |
| BRIDGE STREET MINISTRIES | $110,000 |
| HOPE COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| GRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM | $100,000 |
| WEST MICHIGAN SPORTS COMMISSION | $100,000 |
| GRAND VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| GRANDVILLE AVENUE ARTS & HUMANITIES | $100,000 |
| CRITTER BARN | $100,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY | $100,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN | $100,000 |
| VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
169 repeat relationships — 122 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $944k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MTMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES5× · 2020–2024 · $768k · revenue +41%
- GRGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $650k · revenue +18%
- BIBranch Interfaith Hospitality Network5× · 2020–2024 · $616k · revenue +82% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- EAEcliptic At Rosa Parks Circle Conservancyone grant, 2020 · $100k
- GRGRAND RAPIDS CIVIC THEATRE INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +6%
- MCMSU COLLEGE OF HUMAN MEDICINEone grant, 2020 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
To communicate the relevance of the life-changing message of jesus christ to youth by example and word and challenging them to trust christ and to live for him.
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
Uniting christian faith leaders to serve with humility and love for the flourishing of all in our community.
Hope house of northwest michigan is a non-profit christian maternity home that provides a safe loving residential environment for single expectant young women. through up to two years of residence the organization offers housing baby…
To develop community with the formerly homeless. to offer services to the formerly homeless regardless of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or religious affiliation. to share the love of god with all people we come into contact with.
Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.
To provide a ministry in the form of services to the poor and disadvantaged people of the lansing area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Intervention Services and the most unlike its peers is Michelle Marie Lunn Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
175 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 175 of the 275 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GRAND VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Branch Interfaith Hospitality Network ↗
- Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Grandville Avenue Arts and Humanities Inc ↗
- Who funds DEGAGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds The Potters House ↗
- Who funds JOHN BALL ZOO ↗
- Who funds VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds ROCKFORD COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WEST MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY INC DBA FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS ↗
- Who funds KENT COUNTY YOUTH AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ROOSEVELT PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Holland Home ↗
- Who funds MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds HAND2HAND ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019) ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds CRITTER BARN ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHURCH OUTREACH MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MICHIGAN GREAT LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds Bridge Street House of Prayer ↗
- Who funds GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAS ↗
- Who funds PINE REST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KENT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY ADVOCATES OF KENT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GRACE ADVENTURES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Frey Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · The Meijer Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · The Wege Foundation · The David and Carol Van Andel Family Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · The Sebastian Foundation · The Mercantile Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lutheran World Relief Inc — 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.