· Private foundation
The Chase and Stephanie Coleman Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k35 grants · $104k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $328k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+21 grants · $20M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC | $3,035,500 |
| BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC | $2,857,142 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $2,030,000 |
| NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR | $2,000,000 |
| HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE | $1,916,668 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $1,610,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,267,594 |
| GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION | $525,000 |
| SMART FROM THE START | $505,000 |
| OCEANS 5 | $500,000 |
| BRILLIANT DETROIT | $500,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500,000 |
| SUSTAINABLE OCEAN ALLIANCE INC | $500,000 |
| HEALTH FEDERAL OF PHILADELPHIA | $450,000 |
| ABALOBI ICT4FISHERIES | $400,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $24.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
114 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +19%
- TFTIGER FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2021 · $12M · revenue +108% · 83% of their budget
- THThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $5.6M · revenue +14%
Funded once
- WCWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGEone grant, 2020 · $500k
- TETHE EAST HARLEM SCHOOL AT EXODUS HOUSEone grant, 2020 · $400k
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF NYone grant, 2017 · $350k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
(see schedule o)
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education and the most unlike its peers is Frederick Banting Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
178 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 178 of the 236 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
- Who funds TIGER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds PAVE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds IMENTOR INC ↗
- Who funds LAND TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds EXODUS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE OCEAN ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NYC KIDS RISE INC ↗
- Who funds SMART FROM THE START INC ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
- Who funds BONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robertson Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Al Mailman Family Foundation Inc · Open Society Institute · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · New York State Health Fdn D/B/A New York Health Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Pinkerton Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Chase and Stephanie Coleman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Smart From the Start Inc — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Chase and Stephanie Coleman Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Chase and Stephanie Coleman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.