· Private foundation
The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of THE CHARLIE & MARY BETH O'REILLY FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k146 grants · $368k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $278k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BCFO | $27,500 |
| RESCUE ONE | $25,600 |
| DIOCESAN DEVELOPMENT FUND -SEAS | $25,000 |
| SHAWNEE HILLS ART COUNCIL | $25,000 |
| OPTE-HOPE ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS | $16,500 |
| CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES | $15,000 |
| VICTORY MISSION | $15,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL | $14,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHER MO | $13,000 |
| MISSOURI STATE FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE OZARKS | $10,000 |
| FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT | $10,000 |
| THE RAINBOW NETWORK | $10,000 |
| VITAE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $449k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
210 repeat relationships — 125 still active in FY2024, 85 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $131k · revenue +48%
- CNCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +5%
- DSDynamic Strides Therapy Inc6× · 2017–2023 · $94k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- DODIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELD CAPE GIRADEAUone grant, 2017 · $20k
- DDDIOCESAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (TO SEAS)one grant, 2017 · $18k
- OTOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
In its role as the principal business recruitment and marketing organization for missouri, the missouri partnership attracts new jobs and business investments to the state through collaborative efforts with other state and local economic…
To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc and the most unlike its peers is In Time of Need Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 350 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds THE RAINBOW NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds HELP GIVE HOPE ↗
- Who funds THE KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING TREE ↗
- Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Rescue One ↗
- Who funds Bread For The World Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
- Who funds Good Samaritan Boys Ranch ↗
- Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds SHAWNEE HILLS ART COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Musgrave Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · The Hulston Family Foundation · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · The Turner Family Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.