· Private foundation
Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k65 grants · $124k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $260k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST ELIZABETH ANN SETON CHURCH | $75,000 |
| DRURY UNIVERSITY SWIMMING 4 YEAR PLEDGE | $25,000 |
| SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC SCHOOLS | $25,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - TEEN CENTER | $25,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY CAPITAL FUND DRIVE ATTN JEFF SMITH | $25,000 |
| OZARK LYRIC OPERA | $25,000 |
| THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MO - LUCKY PAWS | $20,000 |
| HARVEST HOME (LEIGH) | $15,000 |
| DRURY UNIVERSITY FBO POOL LANDSCAPING ATTN JEFF FREDRICK | $15,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY ATTN AMOS SHIELS | $12,500 |
| VICTORY MISSION VICTORY HUB CAPITAL PROJECT | $12,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS - CALIFORNIA FIRES | $10,000 |
| DRURY UNIVERSITY FBO MEN'S AND WOMEN'S SWIM TEAM | $10,000 |
| WATCHING OVER WHISKERS - FELINE FUND | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI - LIFEHOUSE CRISIS NURSERY GALA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
112 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 80 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $239k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI8× · 2017–2025 · $127k · revenue +23%
- OFOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC7× · 2018–2025 · $104k · revenue +58%
- HHHarvest Home Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +223%
Funded once
- OFOZARKS FOOD HARVEST CAPTIAL CAMPAIGNone grant, 2020 · $50k
- SRSPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +77%
- CACOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURIone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To conserve america's wildlife heritage for future generations through strategic programs that protect and enhance the national wildlife refuge system and the landscapes beyond its boundaries. by combining policy, landscape-scale…
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.
The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Garden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 376 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds Harvest Home Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ART OF ELYSIUM ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds OZARK GREENWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds SIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Musgrave Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Cook Family Foundation · The Hulston Family Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · The Turner Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.