How much did Musgrave Foundation grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of Musgrave Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

exemptobligationssouthwestspringfieldmuseumgirlschristian

2020

exemptobligationsassemblymethodist churchgodchildren'schristian

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,575,000

Median grant

States reached

$41M

Total assets

Largest grants

Community Foundation of the Ozarks$1,575,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $193k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10M · 74 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

74 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 73 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10M

$285k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%

+51%

Still filing today

38%

26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SS
Springfield Symphony Association
3× · 2018–2020 · $503k · revenue +79%
CP
Community Partnership of the Ozarks
4× · 2018–2021 · $160k · revenue +33%
SR
Springfield Regional Arts Council
3× · 2018–2020 · $103k · revenue +20%

Funded once

FF
Foundation for Springfield Public S
one grant, 2019 · $143k
SC
Springfield Community Center
one grant, 2018 · $31k
AA
Alzheimer's Association
one grant, 2018 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ozark Center

Ozark center provides behavioral health services that span a full continuum of care including psychiatric, substance use and autism spectrum disorders. see schedule o for additional information.

Health

Care Center of Kansas City

Swope ridge geriatric center is a not for-profit corporation whose mission is to provide a continuum of long term care services to our community. we are committed to delivering quality health care with compassion and caring for adult…

—

Community Health Center of Central Missouri

To provide medical, dental and mental health services to residents of cole, osage, moniteau and callaway counties regardless of ability to pay.

Human Services

House of Hope Midwest

The House of Hope is dedicated to serving individuals, families, and our community by providing a hand up into a hope-filled future.

Human Services

College of the Ozarks

To provide a christian education to youth of both sexes, especially those found worthy, but who are without sufficient means to procure sure training.

Education

Springfield Area Parent Child Center

Building bridges of support for children, families, and caregivers. the organization is a member of the vermont parent child center network, and serves southern windsor and northern windham counties. sapcc builds bridges of support for…

Human Services

Ozark Food Pantry

Our mission is to reach out to those in need in our area by providing healthy and nutritious food and other necessities to families and individuals who cannot afford them. in addition, the pantry refers families to other agencies which can…

Food & Nutrition

Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc

Human Services

Community Health Center of Se Kansas

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Catholic Charities of Southern

A faith-based organization that seeks to improve the lives of the vulnerable by providing quality, compassionate social services.

Human Services

Inner City Mission of Springfield

The mission of inner city mission is to provide what is needed to help homeless children, their parents, and single women find their way home.

Religion

Bicycle Coalition of the Ozarks

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/47

the rest of the field

12%

198/1,656

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/42

Grantees still filing

34/42

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$10,120,436Human Services$192,700Community Improvement$160,350Education$54,500Food & Nutrition$34,000Health$28,000Crime & Legal$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO72.8× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · The Hulston Family Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Arvest Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · The Turner Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Musgrave Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Springfield Symphony Association.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +79% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 430797224 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Springfield Symphony Association, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Musgrave Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Musgrave Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Musgrave Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Musgrave Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Musgrave Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Musgrave Foundation?

More from the funding graph