Skip to content
The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$645k
Granted FY2024still arriving
164
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$730kReligion$483kEnvironment$392kHealth$392kEducation$366kPhilanthropy$341kFood & Nutrition$241kHousing & Shelter$175kOther$0
02FY2024 · 164 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k146 grants · $368k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $278k
$2,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BCFO$27,500
RESCUE ONE$25,600
SHAWNEE HILLS ART COUNCIL$25,000
DIOCESAN DEVELOPMENT FUND -SEAS$25,000
OPTE-HOPE ACADEMY$20,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS$16,500
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$15,000
VICTORY MISSION$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$14,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHER MO$13,000
MISSOURI STATE FOUNDATION$11,000
ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY$10,000
FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT$10,000
THE RAINBOW NETWORK$10,000
VITAE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $449k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $5k → 10%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $6k → 18%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $5k → 10%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $4k → 18%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $5k → 10%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $4k → 18%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $3k → 18%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $3k → 18%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $3k → 18%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $3k → 18%LEAST OF THESE: $4k → 8%LEAST OF THESE: $4k → 8%MISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT: $4k → 21%EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND: $5k → 7%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT: $10k → 15%OZARK AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION: $6k → 15%OZARK AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION: $5k → 15%DREW LEWIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%OZARK AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION: $5k → 15%OZARK AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION: $5k → 15%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT: $4k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $25k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $8k → 15%HELP GIVE HOPE: $13k → 15%HELP GIVE HOPE: $8k → 15%HELP GIVE HOPE: $8k → 15%HELP GIVE HOPE: $8k → 15%HELP GIVE HOPE: $8k → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $5k → 15%HELP GIVE HOPE: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SW MO: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SW MO: $13k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHER MO: $13k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SW MO: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHER MO: $7k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 15%THE GATHERING TREE: $10k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $9k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $8k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $7k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $7k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $7k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $6k → 15%THE KITCHEN INC: $6k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 210 repeat orgs$388k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

210 repeat relationships: 125 still active in FY2024, 85 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

210
100

Total granted

$3.7M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+30%

Still filing today

48%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentHealthEducationInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $131k · revenue +48%
  • CN
    CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +5%
  • DS
    Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $94k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELD CAPE GIRADEAU
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • DD
    DIOCESAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (TO SEAS)
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • OT
    OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
5
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
6
Missouri Partnership

In its role as the principal business recruitment and marketing organization for missouri, the missouri partnership attracts new jobs and business investments to the state through collaborative efforts with other state and local economic…

Community Improvement
7
Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…

Civil Rights
8
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
11
Jefferson National Parks Association

Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.

Arts & Culture
12
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc; the most unlike its peers is In Time of Need Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 350 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
161/165
Grantees still filing
115/165
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BCFO: $178,500 · OtherBCFOGREAT CIRCLE: $117,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $107,500 · OtherCONVOY OF HOPE: $111,500 · Other+136 more: $2,002,100 · Other+136 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $66,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…HELP GIVE HOPE: $53,000 · Human ServicesHELP GIVE HO…THE KITCHEN INC: $52,000 · Human ServicesTHE KITCHEN …THE GATHERING TREE: $43,500 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERIN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $36,500 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…Good Samaritan Boys Ranch: $28,000 · Human ServicesGood Samarit…Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation: $25,500 · Human ServicesOzarks Area …LEAST OF THESE INC: $23,500 · Human ServicesFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWER MISSOURI: $17,000 · Human Services+9 more: $78,000 · Human Services+9 moreTHE RAINBOW NETWORK INC: $115,000 · HealthDynamic Strides Therapy Inc: $93,500 · HealthTHE VICTIM CENTER: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 · Health+3 more: $22,500 · HealthGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION: $44,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $29,500 · EnvironmentEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $26,000 · EnvironmentOZARK REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC DBA OZARK LAND TRUST: $24,500 · EnvironmentBUFFALO RIVER FOUNDATION: $22,000 · EnvironmentOZARK GREENWAYS INC: $21,000 · EnvironmentRenew Missouri Advocates: $20,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $15,000 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUND INC: $14,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $10,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,500 · Environment+5 more: $30,500 · EnvironmentCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $129,500 · Crime & LegalGreat Rivers Environmental Law Center: $20,500 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $16,000 · Crime & LegalGREENE COUNTY 100 CLUB: $7,500 · Crime & LegalUNITED WAY OF THE OZARKS INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $31,500 · PhilanthropyCOXHEALTH FOUNDATION: $24,000 · PhilanthropyPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,500 · PhilanthropyOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $20,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $130,500 · Community ImprovementVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $8,750 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,516,600Human Services$442,500Health$281,000Environment$266,500Crime & Legal$173,500Philanthropy$166,500Community Improvement$159,250

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $130,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $129,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $117,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAINBOW NETWORK INC: $115,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $111,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDynamic Strides Therapy Inc: $93,500 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC: $66,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE OZARKS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHELP GIVE HOPE: $53,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE KITCHEN INC: $52,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVITAE FOUNDATION: $51,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION: $44,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GATHERING TREE: $43,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $43,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $36,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $33,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRescue One: $32,700 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetBread For The World Inc: $32,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $31,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $29,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGood Samaritan Boys Ranch: $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $26,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $25,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHAWNEE HILLS ART COUNCIL: $25,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOZARK REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC DBA OZARK LAND TRUST: $24,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCOXHEALTH FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $23,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBUFFALO RIVER FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetJourney to New Life INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CARING PEOPLE: $21,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetOZARK GREENWAYS INC: $21,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetGreat Rivers Environmental Law Center: $20,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetRenew Missouri Advocates: $20,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTIM CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER MISSOURI: $17,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE BRANSON: $15,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds THE RAINBOW NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Dynamic Strides Therapy Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HELP GIVE HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING TREE ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Rescue One ↗
  • Who funds Bread For The World Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds Good Samaritan Boys Ranch ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SHAWNEE HILLS ART COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Larry P O'Reilly and …Stanley & Elaine Ball…Musgrave FoundationOzarks Health Advocac…Robert M - Bobby - Al…The Hulston Family Fo…Roy W Slusher Charita…The Turner Family Fou…Arvest FoundationCommerce Bancshares F…Ozarks Food Harvest I…
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO106× affinity66 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Musgrave Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · The Hulston Family Foundation · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · The Turner Family Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 350 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home