· Private foundation
The Carol and James Collins Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k7 grants · $605k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Los Angeles | $185,000 |
| Collins & Katz Family YMCA | $162,000 |
| Para Los Ninos | $57,500 |
| Ready to Succeed | $50,000 |
| The Change Reaction | $50,000 |
| Heart of Los Angeles Youth | $50,000 |
| Discovery Cube Los Angeles | $50,000 |
| First Graduate | $45,500 |
| Alliance College-Ready Public Schools | $45,000 |
| The 30 Birds Foundation | $42,500 |
| LA Promise Fund | $42,500 |
| Student Health Services Fund dba The LA trust for Children's Health | $42,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of the LA Harbor | $41,000 |
| Bob Baker Marionette Theater | $40,000 |
| 826LA | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $874k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $316k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES5× · 2021–2025 · $271k · revenue +60%
- PLPARA LOS NINOS5× · 2021–2025 · $203k · revenue +18%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR5× · 2020–2025 · $171k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- YMYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angelesgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $52k · revenue +52%
- PSPortal Schoolsone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -82%
- EFEducators for Excellence-Los Angeles (E4E-LA)one grant, 2022 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.
The mission of tlc is to educate diverse students through a rigorous, standards-based, collegepreparatory program to become conscientious, caring, and responsible 21st century citizens. tlc is grounded in an inclusive vision of teaching…
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Crossroads is an independent school for approximately 1,200 students.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
The University of California Student Association (UCSA) is a coalition of students and student governments that aims to provide a collective voice for all students through advocacy and direct action. UCSA participates in the shared…
The archer school for girls is an educational community that supports and challenges young women to discover their passions and realize their true potential by a) providing a rigorous, integrated college preparatory curriculum that fosters…
To prepare students for leadership in the arts and business; where creativity, academic knowledge and financial literacy are essential for success. we are providing an education that integrates the four lenses of learning: academics, arts,…
We transform schools to revolutionize school systems, empowering all students with a high-quality education. the partnership's goals are to 1) dramatically accelerate achievement for students in the district's highest need and historically…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Para Los Ninos and the most unlike its peers is Providers Association for Home Health & Hospice Ag. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS RUN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds Proyecto Pastoral ↗
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
- Who funds PF Bresee Foundation ↗
- Who funds PS ARTS ↗
- Who funds M3nd Project ↗
- Who funds UNITE-LA INC ↗
- Who funds LA PROMISE FUND ↗
- Who funds MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds NEW EARTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds 826LA ↗
- Who funds GET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds SPIRIT SERIES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds THE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SEED SCHOOL OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FIRST GRADUATE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds One Voice ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · The Green Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Carol and James Collins Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.