Skip to content

· Public charity

The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Bbgf accelerates the flow and impact of generosity by moving donations to global nonprofits at unparalleled speed, connecting individuals and corporate donors to one of the world's largest trusted networks of vetted nonprofits.

$536M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14,554
Grants FY2025still arriving
53
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$252MPhilanthropy$178MHealth$172MHuman Services$132MInternational$129MFood & Nutrition$96MYouth Development$65MReligion$58MOther$0
02FY2025 · 14554 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14,554 grants below total $439,635,403, the rows itemized in this filing. The $536,379,224 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $96,743,821 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6060 grants · $42M
  • $10k–50k6946 grants · $135M
  • $50k–250k1341 grants · $125M
  • $250k+207 grants · $138M
$11,000
Median grant
53
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HCA HOPE FUND$11,383,422
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$5,289,530
ALSAC- EFT DEPOSITORY$5,269,182
EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF THE BOEING COMPANY$3,805,852
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$2,243,220
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$2,239,217
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,926,236
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$1,804,553
E4E RELIEF LLC$1,791,936
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$1,759,526
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$1,704,078
GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY$1,688,656
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$1,642,812
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,618,507
GENERAL ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND$1,582,572
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $59.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAUSE FOUNDATION: $474k → 11%KINH5 FOUNDATION: $410k → 10%HOCKEY HELPS INC: $405k → 7%COMMUNITY ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $320k → 16%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1.1M → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1.5M → 14%WEST NASHVILLE DREAM CENTER DBA DREAM STREETS: $358k → 14%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $388k → 11%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $391k → 9%HOCKEY HELPS INC: $365k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1.3M → 14%CONEXION AMERICAS: $484k → 14%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $351k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5.3M → 8%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $640k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1.2M → 14%PC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $733k → 15%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $663k → 8%NORTH AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATION: $867k → 11%PREBLE STREET: $541k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.6M → 8%SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC: $812k → 16%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $582k → 11%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $658k → 8%NORTH AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATION INC: $631k → 11%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $405k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $345k → 11%NORTH AMERICAN TELUGU ASSOCIATION INC: $405k → 11%NRIVA INC: $337k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $403k → 17%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $448k → 14%FREEFROM: $1.0M → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST PAUL & MPLS: $321k → 11%GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1.5M → 21%UNITED WE CARE EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUND: $1.0M → 14%GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $321k → 21%UNITED WE CARE EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUND: $440k → 14%UNITED WE CARE EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUND: $430k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $6.3M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5.5M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3.8M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $990k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $459k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $393k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $359k → 14%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $330k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $354k → 17%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC: $500k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1B · 1795 repeat orgs$41M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

1795 repeat relationships: 1636 still active in FY2025, 159 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1795
94

Total granted

$1.1B
$34M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

93%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HCA HOPE FUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45M · revenue +25% · 86% of their budget
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27M · revenue +145%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24M · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • EC
    EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF BOEING PUGET SOUND - PUGET SOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $3.4M
  • SL
    ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M
  • OC
    ONETEN COALITION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.1M · revenue -53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
3
University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
4
Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education
5
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
6
The University of Toledo Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance the university of toledo through fundraising, stewardship, and prudent asset management to provide scholarship opportunities for students, tier one athletic programs, education events…

Education
7
Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement
8
American Gas Association

American gas association (the association) is an advocate for natural gas utility companies and their customers. the association helps natural gas utilities achieve operational excellence in the safe, reliable and efficient delivery of…

—
9
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
10
Global Ties Us

To build trust and advance peace and prosperity though international exchange.

International
11
United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amherst H Wilder Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jamesons Wings. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1838 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1838 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

75
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
155
Early backer (in before they grew)
1824/1838
Grantees still filing
1267/1838
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $17,397,604 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDAT…GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $10,840,122 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN CITIES U…UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $8,184,576 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER…GENERAL ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $7,038,883 · PhilanthropyGENERAL ELECTRIC EMPL…MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION: $5,374,176 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $5,268,905 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $4,868,986 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $4,775,862 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $4,411,355 · Philanthropy+26 more: $49,285,494 · Philanthropy+26 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $26,920,451 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,440,963 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER S…American Heart Association Inc: $9,762,718 · HealthAmerican Heart As…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $8,116,461 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNIT…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,529,456 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEA…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,723,543 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $4,587,795 · Health+14 more: $24,192,933 · Health+14 moreTHE HCA HOPE FUND: $44,936,944 · Human ServicesTHE HCA HOPE FUNDAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $24,271,443 · Human ServicesAmerican National…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,248,371 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR P…EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $3,919,674 · Human Services+8 more: $14,116,978 · Human Services+8 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,937,512 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL …The Global FoodBanking Network: $6,246,186 · InternationalThe Global Foo…DIRECT RELIEF: $6,133,914 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,167,693 · InternationalInternational …Save The Children Federation Inc: $5,164,871 · InternationalSave The Child…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,929,303 · InternationalUNITED STATES …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,511,298 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4,183,806 · InternationalGIVE2ASIA: $3,391,420 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $3,382,497 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $3,240,255 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $3,137,236 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $3,016,031 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $2,951,758 · International+11 more: $17,338,170 · International+11 morePWC FOUNDATION INC: $7,999,044 · EducationPWC FOUNDAT…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,833,901 · EducationUniversity …RSM US FOUNDATION: $3,139,876 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,881,979 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $2,574,152 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $2,293,067 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,200,027 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,093,427 · Education+24 more: $35,326,479 · Education+24 moreEMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF THE BOEING COMPANY: $17,120,958 · OtherEMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND …+65 more: $122,178,315 · Other+65 moreFeeding America: $8,215,684 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $7,168,543 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $3,694,402 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $3,528,519 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,921,990 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $1,494,193 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,445,830 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,263,127 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $1,247,723 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$117,445,963Health$95,274,320Human Services$92,493,410International$79,731,950Education$62,341,952Other$139,299,273Food & Nutrition$29,980,011

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HCA HOPE FUND: $44,936,944 over 5y, 86% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $26,920,451 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $24,271,443 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $17,397,604 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetEMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF THE BOEING COMPANY: $17,120,958 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,440,963 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $10,840,122 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $9,762,718 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $8,215,684 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $8,184,576 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $8,116,461 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPWC FOUNDATION INC: $7,999,044 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $7,168,543 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetGENERAL ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $7,038,883 over 4y, 81% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,937,512 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network: $6,246,186 over 3y, 14% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $6,133,914 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,529,456 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMGM RESORTS FOUNDATION: $5,374,176 over 5y, 43% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $5,268,905 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,248,371 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,167,693 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,164,871 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,929,303 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $4,868,986 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $4,775,862 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,723,543 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,613,124 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $4,587,795 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,511,298 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $4,411,355 over 6y, 19% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $4,405,947 over 5y, 15% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,276,160 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4,183,806 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $3,919,674 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,833,901 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $3,694,402 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $3,528,519 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $3,412,728 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $3,391,420 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $3,382,497 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $3,324,487 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $3,240,255 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetRSM US FOUNDATION: $3,139,876 over 4y, 13% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $3,137,236 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF UNION COUNTY INC: $3,112,010 over 5y, 45% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $3,016,031 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $3,010,234 over 7y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HCA HOPE FUND ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY FUND OF THE BOEING COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PWC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds GENERAL ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Global FoodBanking Network ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Texas Capital FoundationTX31.4× affinity78 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Capital Foundation · Siemer Institute · Sempra Employee Giving Network · The Pimco Foundation · Pott Foundation · Berges Family Foundation · The Bellwether Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Taco Bell Foundation Inc · Park National Bank Employees' Community Service Fund · The Crawford Taylor Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Blackbaud Giving Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Blackbaud Giving Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Kitchen Inc: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • United Way of Palm Beach County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • United Way of Brevard County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Blackbaud Giving Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Blackbaud Giving Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blackbaud Giving’s filings →

More from the funding graph