· Private foundation
The Bellwether Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $80k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $117k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $555k
- $250k+5 grants · $5.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN | $2,000,000 |
| DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER | $1,400,000 |
| FOREST PARK FOREVER | $1,000,000 |
| CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| URBAN SPROUTS | $130,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC | $100,000 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS | $100,000 |
| CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS (COCA) | $100,000 |
| GREEN HOUSE VENTURE | $70,000 |
| CITY ACADEMY | $55,000 |
| ST LOUIS MERCANTILE LIBRARY AT UMSL | $46,500 |
| FOREST RELEAF OF MISSOURI | $30,000 |
| DREAM BUILDERS 4 EQUITY | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF OKEEHEELEE NATURE CENTER INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $828k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $321k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION8× · 2018–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +146%
- DDDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER4× · 2018–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +120%
- MBMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES4× · 2019–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +37%
Funded once
- GRGREAT RIVERS GREENWAY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $603k · revenue -56%
- CCORTEXone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -65%
- SLST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue +225%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…
To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.
Economic development.
La salle middle school is a public charter school located in st. louis. la salle is committed to transforming children and our community through innovative education. students at la salle are pushed to achieve excellence academically,…
The mission of st. louis voices academy of media arts is to leverage media arts and storytelling to equip students with the agency to excel academically, author their own futures, and make meaningful contributions in their communities.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.
The mission of the siue east st. louis charter high school is to prepare sudents, who are career - and college - ready, upon graduation.
To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.
Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is LitShop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
- Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Tower Grove Park Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVERS GREENWAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND ↗
- Who funds CORTEX ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds READY READERS ↗
- Who funds BEYOND HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
- Who funds MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KIPP ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN HOUSE VENTURE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds FOREST RELEAF OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Berges Family Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Norman J Stupp Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bellwether Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.