How much does The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation give?

The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation reported 77 grants totaling $253,853 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 45 and 67 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (40%), Health (21%), Arts & Culture (9%).

Who are The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: One Voice ($715k), Regents Univ of California ($145k), Universal Community Health Center ($125k).

Does The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include California Community Foundation, The Annenberg Foundation, Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles.

Where is The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation based?

The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation is based in CA.

The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation

The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$254k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$92k

Largest

01What it funds

0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$717kHealth$376kArts & Culture$160kAnimals$100kEducation$90kFood & Nutrition$64kPhilanthropy$60kEnvironment$44kOther$0

02FY2025 · 77 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k74 grants · $127k
$10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$50k–250k1 grant · $92k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.8M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
ONE VOICE	$92,000
UCLA STEIN EYE INSTITUTE	$25,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK	$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC	$7,500
DIRECT RELIEF	$7,500
LION GUARDIANS US	$7,500
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES	$6,000
CENTER THEATRE GROUP	$5,500
LANGE FOUNDATION	$3,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION	$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS	$3,000
MEALS ON WHEELS WEST	$3,000
MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND FOUNDATION	$2,500
ALUMNI & FRIENDS OF FIORELLO LAGUARDIA HIGH SCHOOL	$2,500
GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION	$2,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $748k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.7M · 103 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

103 repeat relationships: 62 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103

Total granted

$1.7M

$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

+1%

Still filing today

57%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentInternationalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OV
One Voice
9× · 2017–2025 · $715k · revenue +39%
UC
Universal Community Health Center
3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +55%
LA
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +315%

Funded once

UR
UC REGENTS
one grant, 2017 · $25k
NEO Philanthropy Incgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +103%
WF
WESTSIDE FOOD BANKgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +29%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals

Last Chance for Animals

Dedicated to ending animal abuse and exploitation through education, public outreach and investigations.

Animals

Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals

Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment

Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

83/84

Grantees still filing

58/84

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Human Services$753,400Other$615,378Health$193,650Education$74,185Animals$66,825International$49,950Arts & Culture$44,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA22.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Johnny Carson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Joseph K & Inez Eichenbaum Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Arthur & Patricia Price Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Arthur & Patricia Price’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home