Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Anna and John J Sie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$12MHealth$12MEducation$6.9MCommunity Improvement$519kReligion$474kHuman Services$412kInternational$171kPublic Safety & Disaster$122kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $307k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $491k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.7M
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION$1,316,253
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO$840,330
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$500,500
DENVER HEALTH & HOSPITALS$225,419
DENVER ART MUSEUM$116,050
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
JUDAISM YOUR WAY$50,000
SERIESFEST$36,400
MILE HIGH MONTESSORI EARLY LEARNING$25,000
DENVER SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND$25,000
MIZEL INSTITUTE-LYON GLOBAL FOUNDAT$25,000
DENVER FILM SOCIETY$20,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA-COLORADO$20,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$20,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BANCROFT NEUROHEALTH: $1k → 12%LAST MILE4D: $5k → 14%THERE WITH CARE: $5k → 12%Down Syndrome Community: $3k → 9%THE DENVER HOSPICE: $4k → 12%THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%THE WAYFARING BAND INC: $500 → 12%THE WAYFARING BAND INC: $500 → 12%El Grupo Vida: $2k → 12%THE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDER: $10k → 12%THE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDER: $10k → 12%THE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDER: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 87 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

87 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

87
64

Total granted

$34M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+7%

Still filing today

62%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DENVER ART MUSEUM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $11M · revenue +18%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +40%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    5× · 2018–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • GD
    Global Down Syndrome Foundation - In-kind from AJSF to GDSF
    one grant, 2018 · $747k
  • UO
    University of Colorado Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado
    one grant, 2023 · $228k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
2
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
3
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
4
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
5
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
6
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce

The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…

—
7
Colorado Academy

Creating curious, kind, courageous, and adventurous learners and leaders.

Education
8
Colorado Bar Association

To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…

—
9
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
11
International School of Denver

Our inclusive, globally-minded community develops highly motivated and academically successful bilingual learners. isd students are inter-culturally adept and make positive contributions in a complex world.

Education
12
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Children's Campaign; the most unlike its peers is I Con Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/90
Grantees still filing
64/90
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DENVER ART MUSEUM: $10,590,650 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUMDENVER FILM SOCIETY: $1,111,780 · Arts & CultureDENVER FILM SOCIETY+12 more: $707,120 · Arts & Culture+12 moreGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $7,512,716 · HealthGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATIO…Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $1,221,191 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado F…+16 more: $1,073,857 · Health+16 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO: $1,687,346 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLO…University of Denver - 2101: $1,010,000 · OtherUniversity of Denver - 2…Global Down Syndrome Foundation - In-kind from AJSF to GDSF: $746,983 · OtherGlobal Down Syndrome Fou…DENVER HEALTH & HOSPITALS: $532,771 · OtherDENVER HEALTH & HOSPITAL…University of Colorado Foundation: $500,000 · OtherUniversity of Colorado F…THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS …DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $375,333 · Other+86 more: $2,504,228 · Other+86 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $4,309,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLO…REGIS UNIVERSITY: $676,249 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSITYSTANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL: $238,793 · Education+16 more: $609,620 · Education+16 moreJUDAISM YOUR WAY: $410,000 · ReligionJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $64,400 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT MCMANUS INC: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO: $9,900 · Youth DevelopmentTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $31,700 · Human ServicesTHE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CARE: $5,000 · Human ServicesLAST MILE4D: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF METRO DENVER INC: $4,000 · Human Services+4 more: $6,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$12,409,550Health$9,807,764Other$7,856,661Education$5,834,162Religion$410,000Youth Development$95,300Human Services$81,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $10,590,650 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $7,512,716 over 8y, 74% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $4,309,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $1,221,191 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDENVER FILM SOCIETY: $1,111,780 over 8y, 11% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $676,249 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJUDAISM YOUR WAY: $410,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $375,333 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSTANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL: $238,793 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $228,257 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC: $174,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCANCER LEAGUE OF COLORADO INC: $165,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $147,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS: $140,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetGLOBAL LIVINGSTON INSTITUTE: $120,450 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetTHE CABLE CENTER: $110,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OVER THE ROCKIES AIR & SPACE MUSEUM: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSERIESFEST: $92,950 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $92,800 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $82,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $82,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC: $81,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetCOLORADO BALLET: $76,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $65,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMILE HIGH MONTESSORI EARLY LEARNING CENT: $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $64,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDENVER BIENNIAL OF THE AMERICAS CORP: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCOLORADO INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS INC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $43,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $41,020 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 1990 INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $31,700 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHOSEN & DEARLY LOVED FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHIME INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RISE SCHOOL OF DENVER: $25,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTAKE NOTE COLORADO: $24,920 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS COLORADO: $22,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT MCMANUS INC: $21,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetStrive Preparatory Schools: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HAVEN: $15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DENVER FILM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDAISM YOUR WAY ↗
  • Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado ↗
  • Who funds DENVER SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER LEAGUE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL LIVINGSTON INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE CABLE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OVER THE ROCKIES AIR & SPACE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds SERIESFEST ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO65.2× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Anschutz Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Libertygives Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Colorado Dental Service Inc · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anna and John J Sie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anna and John J Sie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Anna and John J Sie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Anna and John J Sie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 157 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anna and John J Sie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph