· Private foundation
The Aileen and Jack Pratt Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $221k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAYLOR BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE DALLAS FDN | $65,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF NORTH TEXAS | $53,571 |
| URSULINE ACADEMY OF DALLAS | $52,500 |
| YOUNG CATHOLIC PROFESSIONALS | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ST CECILIA CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| FAMILY GATEWAY | $3,571 |
| BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES | $3,571 |
| YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS | $3,571 |
| AFTER SCHOOL ALL-STARS | $3,571 |
| METROCARE SERVICES | $3,571 |
| FAIR PARK FIRST | $3,571 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
75 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 60 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBaylor Health Care System Foundation5× · 2017–2023 · $143k · revenue +80%
- TCTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +11%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC3× · 2018–2023 · $12k · revenue +429%
Funded once
- DODIOCESE OF DALLAS CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION OUR FAITHOUR FUTURE TRUSTone grant, 2017 · $200k
- TCTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY FDNone grant, 2018 · $100k
- CACISTERCIAN'S ABBEY AND SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.
Provide dental, general pediatric, and pediatric sub-specialty services, including, but not limited to emergency department coverage, inpatient coverage, orthopedic surgery, and craniofacial orthodontics regardless of payor source or…
Dallas Bethlehem Center supports families living in our South Dallas/Fair Park neighborhood through education, health & wellness programs and technology supports.
The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Jhg Texas Corporation Jhg Texas - Helping Texans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 203 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds JHG TEXAS CORPORATION JHG Texas - Helping Texans ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO ↗
- Who funds THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hillcrest Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc · The Perot Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Aileen and Jack Pratt Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.