Skip to content
Tenants and Owners Development Corp at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tenants and Owners Development Corp

To provide affordable housing resident services and community advocacy for the south of market neighborhood in san francisco.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$911kHousing & Shelter$718kHuman Services$535kYouth Development$239kArts & Culture$214kCommunity Improvement$170kPublic Benefit$140kEnvironment$95kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $144,232, the rows itemized in this filing. The $410,498 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $266,266 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH IN ACTION BAY AREA$50,000
NEIGHBORS AND COMMUNITIES UNITED$50,000
BAYANIHAN PARTNERS$25,386
THE KNOX PARTNERS LP$18,846
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $633k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $5k → 10%NEIGHBORS AND COMMUNITIES UNITED: $50k → 10%NPH ACTION FUND: $50k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $150k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $60k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FILIPINO-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $30k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $8k → 10%ONE TREASURE ISLAND: $25k → 10%ONE TREASURE ISLAND: $10k → 10%ONE TREASURE ISLAND: $10k → 10%ONE TREASURE ISLAND: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 10 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
20

Total granted

$2.0M
$921k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+7%

Still filing today

80%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHealthEmploymentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $572k · revenue +71%
  • CO
    Council of Community Housing Organizations
    4× · 2018–2023 · $127k · revenue +85%
  • OT
    ONE TREASURE ISLAND
    4× · 2019–2023 · $55k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • D
    DIGNITYMOVESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue ×11
  • UP
    United Playazgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $151k · revenue +41%
  • PE
    Precita Eyes Muralists Association Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $129k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
2
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
3
San Francisco Housing Action Coalition

Promote public understanding of policies supporting the creation of well-designed, well-located housing at all levels of affordability for residents of the Bay Area, California.

Housing & Shelter
4
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
5
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
6
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
7
Community Board Program

Promotion of peaceful conflict resolution process.

Crime & Legal
8
Urban Habitat Program

Urban Habitat democratizes power and advances equitable policies to create a just and connected Bay Area for low-income communities of color. We confront structural inequities impacting historically disenfranchised communities. Through…

Community Improvement
9
Homeownership San Francisco dba Home Sf

The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.

—
10
Eviction Defense Collaborative Inc

The Eviction Defense Collaborative strives to prevent homelessness, preserveaffordable housing, and protect the diversity of San Francisco. We work toward thesegoals by providing emergency rental assistance and by helping low-income…

Housing & Shelter
11
Bay Area Housing Advocacy Coalition

BAHAC is a 501c4 that advocates for more housing at all levels of affordability at the state and local level.

Housing & Shelter
12
San Francisco Senior and Disability Action Dba Senior & Disability Action

Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Study Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Precita Eyes Muralists Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
16/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Filipino-American Development Foundation: $385,000 · Human ServicesFilipino-American Devel…TIDES CENTER: $87,500 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERONE TREASURE ISLAND: $55,000 · Human ServicesONE TREASURE ISLANDNeighbors and Communities United: $50,000 · Human ServicesNeighbors and Communiti…NPH Action Fund: $50,000 · Human ServicesNPH Action Fund+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC: $571,682 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO STUDY C…West Bay Pilipino Multi-Services Inc: $500,000 · HealthWest Bay Pilipino …+1 more: $5,000 · HealthCouncil of Community Housing Organizations: $127,000 · OtherCouncil of Community Housing…HAIGHT-ASHBURY NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $100,000 · OtherHAIGHT-ASHBURY NEIGHBORHOOD …BAYANIHAN PARTNERS A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $98,702 · OtherBAYANIHAN PARTNERS A CALIFOR…Faith In Action Bay Area: $50,000 · OtherFaith In Action Bay AreaTHE KNOX PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $36,954 · OtherEast Bay Alliance For A Sustainable Economy: $100,000 · OtherEast Bay Alliance For A Sust…THE YERBA BUENA GARDENS CONSERVANCY: $95,000 · OtherTHE YERBA BUENA GARDENS CONS…COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $30,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO PROGRESSIVE MEDIA CENTER: $50,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO PROGRESSIVE ME…+9 more: $95,850 · Other+9 moreDIGNITYMOVES: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterDIGNITYMO…+3 more: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterPrecita Eyes Muralists Association Inc: $129,150 · Arts & CultureBINDLESTIFF STUDIO: $35,000 · Arts & CultureUnited Playaz: $151,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$632,500Education$571,682Health$505,000Other$783,506Housing & Shelter$260,000Arts & Culture$164,150Youth Development$151,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC: $571,682 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetWest Bay Pilipino Multi-Services Inc: $500,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetFilipino-American Development Foundation: $385,000 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetDIGNITYMOVES: $250,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetUnited Playaz: $151,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPrecita Eyes Muralists Association Inc: $129,150 over 1y, 23% of budgetCouncil of Community Housing Organizations: $127,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetEast Bay Alliance For A Sustainable Economy: $100,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $87,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREASURE ISLAND: $55,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNeighbors and Communities United: $50,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PROGRESSIVE MEDIA CENTER: $50,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetNPH Action Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFaith In Action Bay Area: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBINDLESTIFF STUDIO: $35,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $16,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDemocratic Socialists of America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION LANGUAGE AND VOCATIONAL SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJobs with Justice San Francisco: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…United Way of the Bay…The California Endowm…Silicon Valley Commun…Tides CenterThe California Wellne…East Bay Community Fo…Metta FundKaiser Foundation Hos…Tipping Point Communi…Evelyn and Walter Haa…Crankstart Foundation
The San Francisco FoundationCA34.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The California Endowment · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Center · The California Wellness Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Metta Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Tipping Point Community · Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund · Crankstart Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tenants and Owners Development Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tenants and Owners Development Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tenants and Owners Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home