Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Teach a Man to Fish Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$8.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$24MHealth$4.1MEducation$2.6MYouth Development$1.5MInternational$1.3MPublic Benefit$983kPhilanthropy$823kHuman Services$445kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
  • $250k+2 grants · $8.4M
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$144M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Walking Softer$8,065,650
WALKING SOFTER$300,000
ST MARY'S SCHOOL$20,100
WIND RIVER TRIBAL BUFFALO INITIATIVE$10,000
CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE$10,000
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$10,000
Hole Food Rescue Corp$10,000
Great Old Broads for Wilderness$10,000
MIRACLES FOR KIDS INC$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$7,500
HOSPITAL OF ST JOHNS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mother's Grace: $10k → 11%STYLE SAVES: $3k → 15%DRESSMEMBER FOUNDATION: $7k → 13%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $10k → 6%Great Old Broads for Wilderness: $10k → 12%Hoping Hearts Foundation: $15k → 6%WILLOW INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 10%Great Old Broads for Wilderness: $10k → 12%International Network of Hearts: $10k → 11%Fish For Life Inc: $20k → 11%APOPO US INC: $5k → 14%Families in Rich Encounters: $2k → 10%Project Vesta (Far Away Projects): $50k → 10%ONE22 INC: $50k → 5%One22 RESOURCE CENTER: $40k → 5%ONE22 INC: $25k → 5%THE ORPHANED STAR FISH FOUNDATION: $325k → 17%Stars & Stripes Children's Foundation: $220k → 10%THE ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $150k → 17%ONE22 INC: $20k → 5%Orphaned Starfish Foundation: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%Innocence Project Inc: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%Charity Water: $5k → 17%Fallen Firefighter Relief Fund: $3k → 10%Sima Studios: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Teach a Man to Fish Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Teach a Man to Fish Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31M · 58 repeat orgs$5.6M to everyone else

58 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
159

Total granted

$31M
$5.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+38%

Still filing today

83%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WALKING SOFTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $22M · revenue +282% · 100% of their budget
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.9M · revenue +57%
  • DI
    DEPLOYUS INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $550k · revenue +672%

Funded once

  • MS
    MT SAINT JOSEPH COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $536k
  • EC
    ECOLOGY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +103%
  • AQ
    Augies Quest to Cure ALS Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $275k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
6
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
7
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
12
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Walking Softer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Mentoring ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%4%<5yr13%10%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr13%30%20–35yr15%15%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%67%<5yr13%5%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr13%18%20–35yr15%3%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 67% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/178
the rest of the field
11%
543/5,139

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

173 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 173 of the 231 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
170/173
Grantees still filing
117/173
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WALKING SOFTER — $21,947,514 · EnvironmentWALKING SOFTER+29 more — $2,300,500 · Environment+29 moreMT SAINT JOSEPH COLLEGE — $535,697 · OtherMT SAINT JOSEPH …MAPS — $440,000 · OtherMAPSIndividual grant recipient — $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant…MOUNT SAINT JOSEPH — $298,000 · OtherMOUNT SAINT JOSE…PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND — $250,000 · OtherONE DROP FOUNDATION — $250,000 · OtherHANDS TOGETHER MISSION HAITI — $250,000 · OtherCouncil on Strategic Risks — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherStand Together Foundation — $350,000 · OtherStand Together F…+92 more — $2,409,973 · Other+92 moreTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 · EducationUniversity of Santa Monica — $352,200 · EducationTHE CRAIG SCHOOL — $250,000 · EducationSCHOLARS' HOPE FOUNDATION — $225,000 · EducationLETTING EVERYONE ACHIEVE DREAMS — $100,000 · Education+12 more — $251,000 · EducationPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,917,000 · PhilanthropyLEAD WITH LOVE INC — $100,000 · Philanthropy+8 more — $89,500 · PhilanthropyOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc — $485,000 · Human ServicesSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $220,000 · Human ServicesOne22 Inc — $135,000 · Human ServicesFAR AWAY PROJECTS — $50,000 · Human ServicesSIMA STUDIOS — $50,000 · Human Services+13 more — $164,500 · Human ServicesALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $360,000 · HealthAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $275,000 · HealthDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $105,000 · HealthTHE AUTISM COMMUNITY IN ACTION — $65,000 · Health+17 more — $257,500 · HealthLIFE CAMPS INCORPORATED — $450,000 · Crime & Legal
Environment$24,248,014Other$5,483,670Education$2,628,200Philanthropy$2,106,500Human Services$1,104,500Health$1,062,500Crime & Legal$450,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWALKING SOFTER — $21,947,514 over 4y, 100% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDEPLOYUS INC — $550,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER — $500,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc — $485,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE CAMPS INCORPORATED — $450,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $360,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUniversity of Santa Monica — $352,200 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetStand Together Foundation — $350,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $275,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND — $250,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSCHOLARS' HOPE FOUNDATION — $225,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $220,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $210,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC — $150,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetOne22 Inc — $135,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS — $120,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST — $120,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $105,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetUpcycled Food Foundation — $105,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetLEAD WITH LOVE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetSHAREWELL — $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSEPSIS ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COUNCIL ON STRATEGIC RISKS — $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $75,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON HOLE CENTER FOR GLOBAL AFFAIRS INC — $70,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE AUTISM COMMUNITY IN ACTION — $65,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetHole Food Rescue — $55,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAR AWAY PROJECTS — $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPure Game — $50,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetSIMA STUDIOS — $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBOULDER FOOD RESCUE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetJACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE — $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budget350ORG — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLINK GLOBAL — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Doug Coombs Foundation — $40,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONTCLAIR EARLY CHILDHOOD CORP MONTCLAIR COMMUNITY PRE-K — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…Community Foundation …Silicon Valley Commun…PatagoniaorgArgyros Family Founda…Samueli FoundationSpeyer Family Foundat…The David Rockefeller…Edwards Lifesciences …ImpactassetsincThe Devto Support Fou…Sempra Foundation
Orange County Community FoundationCA33.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Argyros Family Foundation · Samueli Foundation · Speyer Family Foundation · The David Rockefeller Fund Inc · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Devto Support Foundation · Sempra Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Teach a Man to Fish Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Elizabeth W Murphey School Inc — 85% of income from government
  • Mobility International Usa — 33% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • Winchester Hospital — 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teach a Man to Fish Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Teach a Man to Fish Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 231 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines