Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Spectemur Agendo Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$775k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Public Benefit$2.8MInternational$1.8MCivil Rights$1.2MArts & Culture$884kHealth$398kEducation$322kEnvironment$199kCrime & Legal$192kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $315k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $460k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY$60,000
JUBILEE USA NETWORK$50,000
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION$50,000
CEDA$50,000
INSTITUTE ON POLICY STUDIES$50,000
THE WOMEN'S MEDIA CENTER$50,000
URBAN JUSTICE CENTERUNITED FOR FREEDOM$50,000
TYPE MEDIA CENTER$40,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$40,000
WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA$40,000
GRUPO DE INFORMACION EN REPRODUCT$40,000
ULTRAVIOLET$40,000
WORLD FEDERALIST ASSOCIATION DBA CITIZENS FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $500 → 14%TRANSPARENTEM LTD: $25k → 17%WOMEN'S E-NEWS: $1k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLONS: $4k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $10k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $15k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
SC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.7M · 188 repeat orgs$969k to everyone else

188 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 179 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

188
191

Total granted

$7.7M
$589k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+22%

Still filing today

66%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +152%
  • PO
    PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $464k · revenue +27%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $222k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Global Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -48%
  • FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +23%
  • VO
    VOICE OF PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Conversationalist
—
2
Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

International
3
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
4
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
5
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
8
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy and the most unlike its peers is Red Panda Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Local Food System Organizat…Youth Sports ProgramsLgbtq+ Community SupportPublic Library OperationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Domestic Violence ServicesCommunity Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsPregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr18%21%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr16%31%35–55yr15%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr16%59%35–55yr15%12%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/244
the rest of the field
13%
1,600/12,757

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

232 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 232 of the 399 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
225/232
Grantees still filing
146/232
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT — $1,183,880 · Public BenefitFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNM…PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC — $463,950 · Public BenefitPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT…Government Accountability Project — $147,909 · Public BenefitGovernment Accountability Proje…Foreign Policy For America Foundation — $125,000 · Public BenefitTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY — $110,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN FORUM — $90,000 · Public Benefit+8 more — $254,070 · Public Benefit+8 moreURGE — $155,000 · OtherURGEREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $143,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUN…NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION — $130,100 · OtherLATIN AMERICAN WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND — $104,000 · OtherThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc — $93,000 · Other+115 more — $1,922,525 · Other+115 moreCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC — $449,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL…NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC — $298,500 · InternationalNATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIV…INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES — $222,033 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STU…CENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY IN THE AMERICAS — $148,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AN…WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA — $134,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LAT…JUBILEE USA NETWORK — $121,000 · InternationalJUBILEE USA NETWORKCenter for Arms Control and — $80,000 · International+17 more — $401,900 · International+17 moreTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC — $366,000 · Arts & CultureTYPE MEDIA…THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC — $305,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMENS…CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC — $57,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR…+13 more — $74,666 · Arts & Culture+13 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $122,865 · Civil RightsCatholics for Choice — $120,000 · Civil RightsUltraViolet Education Fund — $85,000 · Civil RightsDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC — $80,000 · Civil RightsWOMENS ACTION FOR NEW DIRECTIONS EDU FUND INC — $75,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $70,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE — $45,500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE — $45,000 · Civil RightsILLUMINE SERVICE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $4,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC — $215,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS — $15,000 · Education+6 more — $22,000 · EducationTIDES CENTER — $55,000 · Human ServicesTRANSPARENTEM LTD — $25,000 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC — $3,500 · Human Services+2 more — $5,000 · Human Services
Public Benefit$2,374,809Other$2,547,625International$1,854,433Arts & Culture$802,666Civil Rights$672,365Education$272,000Human Services$92,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT — $1,183,880 over 7y, 16% of budgetPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC — $463,950 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC — $449,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC — $366,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC — $305,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetNATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC — $298,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES — $222,033 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC — $215,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY IN THE AMERICAS — $148,000 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetGovernment Accountability Project — $147,909 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $143,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA — $134,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION — $130,100 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetForeign Policy For America Foundation — $125,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $122,865 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJUBILEE USA NETWORK — $121,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetCatholics for Choice — $120,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY — $110,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc — $93,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FORUM — $90,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetUltraViolet Education Fund — $85,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC — $80,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetCenter for Arms Control and — $80,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Global Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC — $75,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS ACTION FOR NEW DIRECTIONS EDU FUND INC — $75,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $71,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $70,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTAXPAYERS FOR COMMON SENSE — $66,570 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOPENSECRETS — $65,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCenter for Political Accountability — $60,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC — $57,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $55,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARLIAMENTARIANS FOR GLOBAL ACTION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBulletin of the Atomic Scientists — $50,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWin Without War Education Fund — $50,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetGuernica Centre for InternationalJustice — $50,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE — $45,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE — $45,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI — $42,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFCNL EDUCATION FUND — $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY — $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ACCURACY — $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeace Development Fund — $17,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $15,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY IN THE AMERICAS ↗
  • Who funds Government Accountability Project ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Foreign Policy For America Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE USA NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Catholics for Choice ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FORUM ↗
  • Who funds UltraViolet Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Arms Control and ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS ACTION FOR NEW DIRECTIONS EDU FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds TAXPAYERS FOR COMMON SENSE ↗
  • Who funds OPENSECRETS ↗
  • Who funds Center for Political Accountability ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation to Promote…Maine Community Found…The Ford FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Davis Family Foundati…Sam L Cohen FoundationMorton-Kelly Charitab…Onion FoundationWellspring Philanthro…Rockefeller Brothers …Carnegie Corporation …Novo Foundation
Foundation to Promote Open SocietyNY47.7× affinity27 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation to Promote Open Society · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Davis Family Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Onion Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Novo Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Spectemur Agendo Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Holistic Life Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Childrens Center — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spectemur Agendo Inc?

Find your warmest path to Spectemur Agendo Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 399 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines