Skip to content
Spectemur Agendo Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Spectemur Agendo Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$775k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$2.8MInternational$1.8MCivil Rights$1.2MArts & Culture$884kHealth$398kEducation$322kEnvironment$199kCrime & Legal$192kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $315k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $460k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY$60,000
JUBILEE USA NETWORK$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
CEDA$50,000
THE WOMEN'S MEDIA CENTER$50,000
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION$50,000
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND$50,000
INSTITUTE ON POLICY STUDIES$50,000
URBAN JUSTICE CENTERUNITED FOR FREEDOM$50,000
TYPE MEDIA CENTER$40,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$40,000
WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA$40,000
GRUPO DE INFORMACION EN REPRODUCT$40,000
ULTRAVIOLET$40,000
WORLD FEDERALIST ASSOCIATION DBA CITIZENS FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $500 → 14%TRANSPARENTEM LTD: $25k → 17%WOMEN'S E-NEWS: $1k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLONS: $4k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $10k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $15k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 14%VOICES FOR PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
SC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 188 repeat orgs$969k to everyone else

188 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 179 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

188
191

Total granted

$7.7M
$589k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+22%

Still filing today

66%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +152%
  • PO
    PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $464k · revenue +27%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $222k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Global Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -48%
  • FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +23%
  • VO
    VOICE OF PROGRESS EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Conversationalist
—
2
Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

International
3
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
4
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
5
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
8
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy; the most unlike its peers is Red Panda Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

232 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 232 of the 399 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
225/232
Grantees still filing
145/232
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: $1,183,880 · Public BenefitFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNM…PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC: $463,950 · Public BenefitPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT…Government Accountability Project: $147,909 · Public BenefitGovernment Accountability Proje…Foreign Policy For America Foundation: $125,000 · Public BenefitTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $110,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN FORUM: $90,000 · Public Benefit+9 more: $255,570 · Public Benefit+9 moreURGE: $155,000 · OtherURGEREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $143,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUN…NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $130,100 · OtherLATIN AMERICAN WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND: $104,000 · OtherThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $93,000 · Other+114 more: $1,921,025 · Other+114 moreCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC: $449,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL…NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC: $298,500 · InternationalNATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIV…INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $222,033 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STU…CENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY IN THE AMERICAS: $148,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AN…WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA: $134,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LAT…JUBILEE USA NETWORK: $121,000 · InternationalJUBILEE USA NETWORKCenter for Arms Control and: $80,000 · International+17 more: $401,900 · International+17 moreTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC: $366,000 · Arts & CultureTYPE MEDIA…THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $305,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMENS…CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC: $57,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR…+13 more: $74,666 · Arts & Culture+13 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $122,865 · Civil RightsCatholics for Choice: $120,000 · Civil RightsUltraViolet Education Fund: $85,000 · Civil RightsDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $80,000 · Civil RightsWOMENS ACTION FOR NEW DIRECTIONS EDU FUND INC: $75,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $70,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE: $45,500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE: $45,000 · Civil RightsILLUMINE SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $4,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $215,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $15,000 · Education+6 more: $22,000 · EducationTIDES CENTER: $55,000 · Human ServicesTRANSPARENTEM LTD: $25,000 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $3,500 · Human Services+2 more: $5,000 · Human Services
Public Benefit$2,376,309Other$2,546,125International$1,854,433Arts & Culture$802,666Civil Rights$672,365Education$272,000Human Services$92,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: $1,183,880 over 7y, 16% of budgetPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC: $463,950 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC: $449,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC: $366,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $305,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetNATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC: $298,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $222,033 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $215,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY IN THE AMERICAS: $148,000 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetGovernment Accountability Project: $147,909 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $143,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA: $134,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $130,100 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetForeign Policy For America Foundation: $125,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $122,865 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJUBILEE USA NETWORK: $121,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetCatholics for Choice: $120,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $110,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $93,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FORUM: $90,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetUltraViolet Education Fund: $85,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $80,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetCenter for Arms Control and: $80,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Global Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS ACTION FOR NEW DIRECTIONS EDU FUND INC: $75,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $71,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $70,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTAXPAYERS FOR COMMON SENSE: $66,570 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOPENSECRETS: $65,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCenter for Political Accountability: $60,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC: $57,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $55,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWin Without War Education Fund: $50,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPARLIAMENTARIANS FOR GLOBAL ACTION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBulletin of the Atomic Scientists: $50,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGuernica Centre for InternationalJustice: $50,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE: $45,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI: $42,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFCNL EDUCATION FUND: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC ACCURACY: $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeace Development Fund: $17,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $15,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY IN THE AMERICAS ↗
  • Who funds Government Accountability Project ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Foreign Policy For America Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE USA NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Catholics for Choice ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FORUM ↗
  • Who funds UltraViolet Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Arms Control and ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS ACTION FOR NEW DIRECTIONS EDU FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds TAXPAYERS FOR COMMON SENSE ↗
  • Who funds OPENSECRETS ↗
  • Who funds Center for Political Accountability ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation to Promote…Maine Community Found…The Ford FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Davis Family Foundati…Sam L Cohen FoundationMorton-Kelly Charitab…Onion FoundationWellspring Philanthro…Rockefeller Brothers …Carnegie Corporation …Novo Foundation
Foundation to Promote Open SocietyNY47.7× affinity27 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation to Promote Open Society · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Davis Family Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Onion Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Novo Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spectemur Agendo Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spectemur Agendo Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Holistic Life Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Childrens Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spectemur Agendo Inc?

Find your warmest path to Spectemur Agendo Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 399 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spectemur Agendo’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home