How much did CARNEGIE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of CARNEGIE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

leverageemotional academickoreanlookingcontinentalnorth atlanticatlantic treaty

2020

emergency responsestudent emergencycovid pandemiccovid crisisresponse covidincrease civicone-time covid

2021

trellis educationeducator-preparationrelief afghanistanfindjudicialtechnological changeglobal challenges

2022

advancementrfp domestic-internationaldomestic-international connectioncivic newsrelief haiticonducting learner-centeredlearner-centered whole

2023

rfphumanitarian aidaid wakewake februaryfebruary earthquakeearthquake middleeast specifically

2024

political polarizationfinal curriculum-basedsocial mediapolarizedfinal advancingwantweapons issues

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 525 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k7 grants · $32k
$10k–50k21 grants · $573k
$50k–250k287 grants · $42M
$250k+210 grants · $106M

$200,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.5B

Total assets

Largest grants

Neo Philanthropy$3,033,300
National Center for Civic Innovation$2,250,000
Miami Foundation$2,166,700
New York Public Library$2,083,400
University of Ghana$1,800,000
Regional Universities Forum for Capacity Building in Agriculture (RUFORUM)$1,413,300
NewSchools Venture Fund$1,362,000
Institute of International Education Inc$1,300,000
University of Cape Town$1,275,000
Neo Philanthropy$1,250,000
African Institute for Mathematical Sciences - Next Einstein Initiative (Rw$1,200,000
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors$1,166,800
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc$1,166,700
BSCS Science Learning$1,100,000
Heritage and Arts Foundation$1,100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $18.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$985M · 733 repeat orgs$72M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

733 repeat relationships — 323 still active in FY2024, 410 since wound down; 82 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

733

295

Total granted

$985M

$53M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

+19%

Still filing today

55%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationInternationalArts & CulturePublic BenefitPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Neo Philanthropy
7× · 2018–2024 · $36M · revenue +191%
National Center for Civic Innovation
7× · 2018–2024 · $20M · revenue +497% · 41% of their budget
CE
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
7× · 2018–2024 · $16M · revenue +49%

Funded once

NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUSTgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $4.0M · revenue +28%
AI
AFRICAN INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES NEXT EINSTEIN INITIATIVE FDN CA
one grant, 2018 · $1.3M
DP
DIGITAL PROMISE
one grant, 2018 · $1.1M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—

Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—

Aacsb International - the Association to

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education

National Bureau of Economic

The national bureau of economic research is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to promoting a greater understanding of how the economy works. it is committed to undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic…

Social Science

University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

Competitive Enterprise Institute

Public policy research/education dedicated to principles of free enterprise & limited government.

—

The American Assembly

A national non partisan public policy forum to illuminate issues of public policy.

—

Fielding Graduate University

Fielding provides doctoral, master's and graduate-level certificate programs in the fields of educational leadership, organization development, and psychology.

—

The International Institute for

International

Council of Independent Colleges

The council of independent colleges is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university…

—

National Association of College and

Advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—

National Constitution Center

The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization devoted to teaching about the Constitution.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education Pioneers and the most unlike its peers is Statue of Liberty Ellis Island. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%3/574

the rest of the field

11%

206,161/1,818,991

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

567 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

559/567

Grantees still filing

396/567

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$535,398,518Education$235,929,076International$112,403,250Public Benefit$57,380,030Social Science$42,954,910Community Improvement$37,647,550Arts & Culture$35,648,851

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA126.9× affinity132 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Democracy Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · New Profit Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CARNEGIE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

14get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTER FOR POLICY STUDIES IN RUSSIA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 770411864 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CENTER FOR POLICY STUDIES IN RUSSIA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Carnegie Corporation of New York?

Find your warmest path to Carnegie Corporation of New York through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CARNEGIE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

567 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Carnegie Corporation of New York?

More from the funding graph

CARNEGIE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

567 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Carnegie Corporation of New York?

More from the funding graph