· Public charity
Somos Un Pueblo Unido
To provide educational resources and information to immigrants and low- wage workers in new mexico regarding rights, protections, and remedies; develop and implement strategies to protect immigrants' civil and human rights; and organize activities that increase public awareness about immigrant and workers' rights in new mexico and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $225,835 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $230,835 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOMOS ACCION | $100,000 |
| NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND | $25,167 |
| THE OLE EDUCATION FUND | $25,167 |
| EL CENTRO DE IGUADLDAD Y DERECHOS | $25,167 |
| CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY | $25,167 |
| NEW MEXICO COMUNIDADES EN ACCION | $25,167 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $682k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNM Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe6× · 2020–2025 · $341k · revenue +27%
- CFCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY6× · 2020–2025 · $316k · revenue +32%
- NMNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY6× · 2020–2025 · $316k · revenue +162%
Funded once
Forward Togetherone grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -47%- PFPARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +205%
- NMNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
NMVC Action Fund engages in lobbying activities in support of New Mexicos children and families and it participates in electoral activities.
To advocate for policies that impact the common good and welfare of new mexicans, such as health care, energy, natural resources, the economy and jobs, and voting rights issues. to educate the public about social welfare issues that impact…
El centro poder y accion is an albuquerque-based civil rights and workers' justice organization that advocates for just working conditions and policies that ensure all new mexicans' have the opportunity to thrive. we focus on growing the…
Aclu of nm foundation is the state affiliate of alcu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. our purpose is to protect and advance justice, liberty, and equity.
NM Voters First (NMVF) was incorporated in 2024 with the mission to support candidates tha believe in empowering and enhancing democracy and encouraging legislators to support fair and equitable elections that expand peoples political…
Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.
To advocate for a culture of support that empowers New Mexicans to act on their own behalf towards a better quality of life.
Aclu-nm is the state affiliate of the aclu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. the purpose of aclu-nm is to protect and advance justice, liberty and equity as guaranteed by the constitutions of new mexico…
To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
We are texas lawyers for texas communities, boldly serving the movement for equality and justice in and out of the courts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is The Ole Education Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NM Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY ↗
- Who funds THE OLE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds SOMOS ACCION ↗
- Who funds Forward Together ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · Community Catalyst Inc · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · Center for Civic Policy
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Somos Un Pueblo Unido funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Somos Un Pueblo Unido?
Find your warmest path to Somos Un Pueblo Unido through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.