· Private foundation
Seed the Dream Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
54% of Seed the Dream Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 83 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Seed the Dream Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 102 organizations, $9M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k40 grants · $99k
- $10k–50k60 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+6 grants · $5.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PEF Israel Endowment Funds Inc | $1,716,520 |
| Birthright Israel Foundation | $1,595,000 |
| KAVOD | $1,581,227 |
| Jewish Funders Network | $518,360 |
| American Friends of Latet Humanitarian Aid Inc | $275,000 |
| Jewish Federations of North America Inc | $250,720 |
| Maccabi USA Inc | $200,000 |
| University of Southern California | $160,000 |
| Youth Renewal Fund | $112,500 |
| New York Legal Assistance Group Inc | $110,000 |
| American Committee for the Tel Aviv Foundation Inc | $107,000 |
| American Jewish Committee | $106,000 |
| The One Love Foundation Inc | $100,000 |
| The Jewish Education Project | $100,000 |
| Facing History and Ourselves Inc | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $7.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 26% of Seed the Dream Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
142 repeat relationships — 100 still active in FY2022, 42 since wound down; 98 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KKAVOD6× · 2019–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +275% · 29% of their budget
- BIBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +67%
- YRYOUTH RENEWAL FUND6× · 2019–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +37%
Funded once
- BIBirthright Israelone grant, 2019 · $1.5M
- JFJEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS (KAVOD SHEF)one grant, 2020 · $623k
- BTBET TZEDEKgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.
Enrich the lives of jewish students
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…
Brown risd hillel encourages and supports a diversity of students as they explore, develop and deepen their jewish identities. we are committed to having judaism serve as a source of meaning and growth during their time on college hill and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jared Armstrong Basketball Camps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
236 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 236 of the 334 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds KAVOD ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH RENEWAL FUND ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds MACCABI USA INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
- Who funds PASSAGES AMERICA ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Student Enrichment Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ONWARD ISRAEL USA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
- Who funds STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC ↗
- Who funds BET TZEDEK ↗
- Who funds Fuente Latina Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO INC ↗
- Who funds ITREK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds CHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maccabee Task Force Foundation · Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Birthright Israel Foundation · The Jewish Federations of North America Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Jewish Communal Fund · The Snider Foundation · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Sephardic Home for the Aged Foundation Dba the Sephardic Foundation on Aging
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seed the Dream Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Atria Collective Inc — 96% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Jewish Community Center of Baltimore Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Services of Northern New Jersey Inc — 1% of income from government
- Island Grown Initiative Ltd — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.