How much did Maccabee Task Force Foundation grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of Maccabee Task Force Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

enrich livesstudentundergraduate graduatelives enrichvibrantreligiouscultural

2019

federationstrainingtulanearoundjewsnorthsustain

2020

education trip

2021

education trip

2022

education trip

2023

hilleleducation tripinternational

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $14k
$10k–50k9 grants · $210k
$50k–250k33 grants · $4.1M
$250k+3 grants · $1.0M

$120,835

Median grant

States reached

$5.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

Jewish Federation of Metro Chicago$490,731
Hillel of San Diego$261,241
Oregon Hillel$257,433
Hillels of Georgia$197,942
Boston University Hillel$167,014
Northeastern University Hillel$153,515
Hillel at the University of Vermont$148,187
North Carolina Hillel Foundation$144,090
Hillel at FSU Foundation Inc$134,918
Hillel Foundation of New Orleans$133,000
Rutgers Hillel Corp$133,000
B'nei Brith Hillel Foundation at Uc$132,519
Texas Hillel Foundation$132,000
Hillel Foundation at Indiana Univer$130,185
Kristol Center for Jewish Life$129,564

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Maccabee Task Force Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Maccabee Task Force Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 62% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$48M · 124 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

124 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 83 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

124

Total granted

$48M

$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%

+32%

Still filing today

60%

47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $613k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionEducationPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CO
Chabad on Campus Intl
8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +85%
HT
Hillel the Found for Jewish C
7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +67%
HO
Hillels of Georgia
6× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +317% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

JC
Jewish Community Fed of Balti
one grant, 2019 · $270k · revenue +13%
HO
Hillel of Broward and Palm Begraduated
one grant, 2019 · $262k · revenue +40%
HA
Hillel at Kent State
one grant, 2022 · $243k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel of Colorado is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization that proudly serves students at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, and the University of Denver. Hillel enriches the lives of students during their college years and beyond,…

—

Hillel the Foundation of Jewish

Cincinnati Hillel enriches the lives and strengthens the Jewish identity of Jewish college students in Greater Cincinnati and builds bridges to Jewish life after college.

—

Hillel Foundation for Jewish Life

Hillel of Buffalo serves the jewish community at the NYS University at Buffalo and encourages the participation of jewish students and faculty from all area colleges and universities. It is Hillel of Buffalo's mission to foster jewish…

—

Hillel At the University of

To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—

The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—

Hillel Foundation at Miami University

Enriching the lives of Jewish students.

—

Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Providing social and educational activities in order to create a community for Jewish students at Sonoma State University. Primary programs include celebrating Jewish holidays as a community, holding monthly Sabbath dinners (COVID…

—

Friends of Hillel At Stony Brook Inc

Enriching the lives of jewish students so that they may enrich the jewish people & the world hillel students leaders, professional & lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming & inclusive environment for jewish college…

Religion

Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

social, religious, cultural programs for Jewish students at Bradley University

—

Hillel Foundation At the University

The mission of uri hillel is to enrich the lives of jewish students at the university of rhode island so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—

Hofstra University Hillel

Enriching the lives of jewish students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—

Hillel At Cornell Inc

I) represent the jewish community at cornell university in meeting the religious, cultural, recreational, and social needs of students and faculty; (ii) help create, develop, and support appropriate activities sponsored by jewish students…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hillel Jewish University Center and the most unlike its peers is Mtf Leadership Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/94

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,471

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

91 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

90/91

Grantees still filing

68/91

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$39,414,919Religion$5,834,797Philanthropy$2,448,224Education$2,228,234International$1,333,512Arts & Culture$555,799Civil Rights$425,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus LifeDC151.3× affinity69 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life · Birthright Israel Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Israel on Campus Coalition · Seed the Dream Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Jewish Federation of Greater · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San · Penny and Robert Sarver Charitable · United Jewish Appeal-Federation Of · The Milstein Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Maccabee Task Force Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

9get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MTF Leadership Institute.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~59 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 830832301 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MTF Leadership Institute, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 59 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Maccabee Task Force Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Maccabee Task Force Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Maccabee Task Force Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

91 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Maccabee Task Force Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Maccabee Task Force Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

91 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Maccabee Task Force Foundation?

More from the funding graph