Skip to content

Florida · Nonprofit

GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC

GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC (Florida) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,062,311 to it, the largest being Maccabee Task Force Foundation ($315,057). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.7M
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$1.1M
Net assets
$4.8M
11/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 20%
01What it does

What Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc does

Mission

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program.

Florida hillels poland fellowship conceived and implemented by um hillel, students from throughout florida hillels were invited to join a trip to travel to poland for a 7-day historical and cultural experience including visits to auschwitz-birkenau, treblinka, majdanek, the warsaw ghetto, a shtetl, and yeshivat chachmei lublin where daf yomi (daily page) study of talmud was conceived. The trip was staffed by program personnel from um hillel. The trip is designed to provide a foundation for students to educate and inspire others when they return, both on campus and in their home communities. Student therapy approximately 1350 students attended at least one event or activity at um hillel at during the year. The need was perceived to provide students with the support of a professional to deal with issues beyond what program personnel are able to address. While the dozens of day-to-day hillel programs offer students opportunities to advance self-esteem, spiritual awareness, community and connection, for those times and those students who need more support, beginning this year a therapist and wellness coordinator offers students free, confidential therapy sessions to help deal with academic pressure, social issues, and personal challenges. Each of the 1,350 students who connected themselves to um hillel had access to this service. This professional is shared with florida international university hillel. Jewish agency israel fellow in the second half of the school year, a jewish…

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).

  1. Florida hillels poland fellowship seventy students from throughout florida traveled to poland for a 7-day historical and cultural experience including visits to auschwitz-birkenau, treblinka, majdanek, the warsaw ghetto, a shtetl, and yeshivat chachmei lublin where daf yomi (daily page) study of talmud was conceived. The trip is designed to provide a foundation for students to educate and inspire others when they return, both on campus and in their home communities.

    $278,618 spent$104,372 earned by the program
    21% of program spending
  2. Shabbat services and dinner following a time-honored tradition, students on campus celebrate shabbat, the jewish sabbath, each week which begins at sundown on friday night. Shabbat prayer services are followed by a communal shabbat dinner which together offer students the opportunity to put aside the challenges of the week and focus on spiritual growth and renewal, while strengthening their sense of community and connection to their peers. As many as 170 students gathered on any one shabbat. More than 3,800 shabbat and holiday dinners were provided to students during the school term.

    $119,390 spent
    9% of program spending
  3. Cohort based learning fellowships three different groups totaling 90 students participated in 10-, 6- and 4- week experiential, conversational seminars for students who wish to deepen their understanding of themselves and their connection to judaism while cultivating empathy for a world full of complex human experiences. Through the prism of ancient jewish texts, "jewish learning" fellows address lifes biggest questions, drawing on the life experiences and intuition of students to explore what jewish tradition has to say about contemporary issues. "kol yisrael" is for students to explore big ideas and questions regarding israel. Employing an inquiry-centered model, students explore diverse perspectives and views from the israeli landscape while utilizing universal values. This cohort enables learners to encounter others perspectives in a genuine way while also authentically bringing their own voices to the conversation. "four the moment" is an accessible, down-to- earth approach to support students in deepening connections to the jewish sabbath through a hands-on learning experience. The emphasis is breaking down barriers, culminating with an oncampus communal dinner experience…

    $77,117 spent
    6% of program spending
  4. Including the three largest programs by expenditure, there are 14 program categories with a total of 52 programs. They include orientation programs in both spring and fall, cohort based learning, an annual signature event, external event attendance, an assortment of programs conceived and implemented by the student board, graduation, holocaust awareness, micro community programs, jewish education and ritual, one-on-one engagement, graduate student programs, student professional development, jewish holidays observances, programming related to israel and israeli culture, volunteer activities and travel programs including a trip to israel for students who are not jewish, first time travel to israel for students plus extended internships in israel, called onward israel, for a number of those students. A number of these programs are organized and dministered by um hillel while the funding is handled by and through other organizations.

    $882,049 spent
    65% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,357,174.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($871k) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($4.9M)2018 Revenue 130 ($1.1M) Expenses 127 ($1.3M) Net assets 97 ($4.8M)2019 Revenue 143 ($1.2M) Expenses 138 ($1.4M) Net assets 95 ($4.7M)2020 Revenue 181 ($1.6M) Expenses 144 ($1.4M) Net assets 98 ($4.8M)2021 Revenue 143 ($1.2M) Expenses 101 ($1.0M) Net assets 103 ($5.1M)2022 Revenue 145 ($1.3M) Expenses 117 ($1.2M) Net assets 105 ($5.2M)2023 Revenue 133 ($1.2M) Expenses 121 ($1.2M) Net assets 104 ($5.1M)2024 Revenue 141 ($1.2M) Expenses 132 ($1.3M) Net assets 102 ($5.0M)2025 Revenue 194 ($1.7M) Expenses 177 ($1.8M) Net assets 97 ($4.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (194)Expenses (177)Net assets (97)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $6.6M to $5.9M (−12%).

$6.6M
$5.9M
$5.1M
$5.1M
$5.4M
$5.4M
$5.2M
$5.1M
$4.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12% · 2022 14% · 2023 4% · 2024 17% · 2025 65%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$129k
’17
−$138k
’18
−$133k
’19
$141k
’20
$235k
’21
$91k
’22
−$44k
’23
−$94k
’24
−$84k
’25
2.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Mycki Ratzan

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed151519232319181919
Joined·+1+5+6+4+1+2+8+1
No longer listed·11245371
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $103k → $110k.

7 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 36% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $3.4M from 7 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC raised.

From the IRS filings of GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 69%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

86% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC.

30%
largest funder
69%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 81% · 2018 81% · 2019 61% · 2020 58% · 2021 34% · 2022 45% · 2023 70% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC draws 64% of its grant income from funders outside Florida, across 9 states in all.

ME
MI
NY
NV
OH
PA
CA
DE
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Florida out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $385k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Florida

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 13%Fundraising 11%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

62%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC?
GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC (Florida) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,062,311 to it, the largest being Maccabee Task Force Foundation ($315,057). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $1,062,311 in grants to GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC?
Maccabee Task Force Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $315,057 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Florida. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Greater Miami Hillel →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing