Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel's mission is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
165
Grants FY2025still arriving
38
States reached
$398k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Religion$80MPhilanthropy$2.2MEducation$1.2MInternational$356kHealth$220kCommunity Improvement$193kPublic Benefit$95kHuman Services$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 165 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 165 grants below total $11,649,453 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,210,126 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,560,673 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $151k
  • $10k–50k63 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k79 grants · $9.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$49,930
Median grant
38
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hillel-Univ of Florida$397,500
Hillel of San Diego$328,234
Hillel-CUNY Queens College$300,625
Hillel-Baruch College$241,833
Hillel-NC$241,396
Hillel 818$219,900
Hillel-Rutgers University$214,465
Hillel-Univ of Central Florida$206,836
Hillel-Univ of CA Davis$202,429
Hillel-Boston University$202,099
Hillel-Ohio State University$200,361
Hillel-Univ of Pennsylvania$191,484
Hillel-University of Arizona$185,923
Hillel-University of Wisconsin Madison$185,584
Hillel-Northeastern University$185,193
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BELOVED BUILDERS INC: $15k → 9%HILLEL OF ROCKLAND: $34k → 14%Hillel of Rockland: $18k → 14%HILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $14k → 14%Hillel of Rockland: $12k → 14%Hillel of Rockland: $11k → 14%ISRAELI LEADERSHIP CLUB DBA ISRAELI AMERICAN COUNCIL: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $2.5M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Russia and Neighboring States$1.2M · 48% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: Program Services

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.0M · 41% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: Program Services

Middle East and North Africa$229k · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Program Services

South America$53k · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Program Services

North America (Canada and Mexico)$5k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Program Services

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$80M · 142 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

142 repeat relationships — 126 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

142
38

Total granted

$80M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+28%

Still filing today

92%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE AT THE PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +85% · 41% of their budget
  • GJ
    GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +87% · 37% of their budget
  • BU
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +28% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • HS
    HILLEL-PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $433k
  • OI
    ONETABLE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $106k · revenue +24%
  • HO
    HILLEL-UNIV OF CALIFORNIA LA
    one grant, 2017 · $97k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hillel At the University of Rochester Inc

To enhance jewish life for the university community.

—
2
Hillel At the Claremont Colleges

Hillel seeks to be a vibrant jewish presence for claremont colleges students, involving them in ways which enhance their connection to the jewish religion, the jewish people and their lasting commitment to jewish life.

Religion
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Temple Hillel

The mission of hillel at temple is to connect and inspire students to make an enduring commitment to jewish life,learning, and community.

—
6
Friends of Hillel At Stony Brook Inc

Stony brook hillel is a home for jewish students to explore their relationship with judaism, israel and each other. we strive to create a dynamic space where students feel a sense of community, the desire to explore, the freedom to be…

Religion
7
Hillels of Illinois Endowment Foundation

The foundation was established exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, a not-for-profit organization.

Education
8
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
9
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
10
Jerusalem University College

Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…

International
11
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
12
Rita Levine Rabin Hillel At Hunter College Inc

To give students experiences in and exposure to a community of friends and mentors in a jewish culture that explores life, locates meaning, and develops a sense of purpose.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brown Hillel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%51%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%75%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%2/203
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,362

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

181 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 181 of the 207 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

28
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
59
Early backer (in before they grew)
178/181
Grantees still filing
140/181
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CENTRAL FLORIDA HILLEL INC — $2,451,089 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE AT THE PENN STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,340,723 · OtherGAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC — $2,227,767 · Other+119 more — $58,271,112 · Other+119 moreSYRACUSE HILLEL INC — $1,049,191 · ReligionSYRACUSE …HILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC — $992,437 · ReligionHILLEL FO…CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL — $928,064 · ReligionCONGREGAT…COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC — $678,556 · ReligionCOLUMBIAB…THE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC — $571,940 · ReligionTHE CENTE…HILLEL FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY — $466,820 · ReligionHILLEL FO…THE NORTH 34TH STREET FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $449,951 · ReligionTHE NORTH…JOSEPH SLIFKA CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT — $376,832 · ReligionJOSEPH SL…Hillel of San Luis Obispo — $368,191 · ReligionHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC — $361,345 · ReligionHouston Hillel — $281,149 · Religion+4 more — $405,987 · Religion+4 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,647,763 · PhilanthropyTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $1,071,160 · PhilanthropySanta Barbara Hillel — $638,258 · PhilanthropyCLEVELAND HILLEL FOUNDATION INC — $532,948 · Philanthropy+9 more — $540,407 · PhilanthropyPENN HILLEL — $2,246,764 · EducationNew York University — $1,103,426 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $230,643 · Education+41 more — $1,499,175 · EducationTHE BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,357,847 · Civil RightsThe Design Platform — $170,000 · Community ImprovementREPAIR THE WORLD — $22,500 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY — $8,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC — $80,220 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RUSSIAN JEWISH CONGRESS — $80,000 · International
Other$65,290,691Religion$6,930,463Philanthropy$5,430,536Education$5,080,008Civil Rights$1,357,847Community Improvement$200,500International$160,220

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,647,763 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTRAL FLORIDA HILLEL INC — $2,451,089 over 9y, 38% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE AT THE PENN STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,340,723 over 8y, 41% of budgetPENN HILLEL — $2,246,764 over 9y, 10% of budgetGAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC — $2,227,767 over 9y, 37% of budgetBOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC — $2,170,332 over 9y, 38% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT QUEENS COLLEGE INC — $1,534,493 over 9y, 23% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,481,148 over 9y, 25% of budgetHILLEL AT BARUCH INC — $1,387,173 over 9y, 18% of budgetBEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD — $1,384,335 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetTHE BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,357,847 over 9y, 22% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO — $1,342,952 over 9y, 9.8% of budgetHILLEL 818 — $1,289,808 over 8y, 28% of budgetHUNTER HILLEL FOUNDATION — $1,186,642 over 9y, 23% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA — $1,162,237 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,151,872 over 9y, 22% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION — $1,128,213 over 9y, 13% of budgetTEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION — $1,121,518 over 9y, 11% of budgetHILLEL JEWISH UNIVERSITY CENTER — $1,109,711 over 9y, 17% of budgetNew York University — $1,103,426 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC — $1,100,088 over 9y, 22% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $1,071,160 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION — $1,059,365 over 9y, 20% of budgetBNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE — $1,054,451 over 9y, 14% of budgetSYRACUSE HILLEL INC — $1,049,191 over 9y, 36% of budgetHILLEL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT — $1,042,655 over 9y, 35% of budgetCU BOULDER HILLEL FOUNDATION — $1,038,231 over 7y, 52% of budgetHILLEL AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY INC — $1,036,175 over 9y, 32% of budgetTHE HILLEL JEWISH CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $1,028,121 over 9y, 22% of budgetCORNELL HILLEL — $1,026,996 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation — $1,010,446 over 9y, 13% of budgetKRISTOL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE INC — $1,007,036 over 9y, 18% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC — $992,437 over 9y, 16% of budgetHILLEL AT BRANDEIS INC — $974,316 over 9y, 21% of budgetHILLEL AT FSU FOUNDATION INC — $963,699 over 8y, 48% of budgetHillels of Georgia Inc — $934,720 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL — $928,064 over 9y, 10% of budgetHillel at Binghamton Inc — $911,965 over 9y, 37% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $905,966 over 9y, 25% of budgetHILLEL HOUSE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MASS AT AMHERST — $872,171 over 8y, 20% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC — $808,970 over 9y, 16% of budgetHILLEL AT FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $778,115 over 9y, 32% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $777,957 over 9y, 18% of budgetHILLEL AT WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS — $741,941 over 9y, 12% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO HILLEL — $733,912 over 9y, 14% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $720,657 over 9y, 14% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC — $678,556 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetMICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC — $668,556 over 9y, 4.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL FLORIDA HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE AT THE PENN STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PENN HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON UNIVERSITY HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT QUEENS COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT BARUCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD ↗
  • Who funds THE BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL 818 ↗
  • Who funds HUNTER HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL JEWISH UNIVERSITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI HILLEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT ↗
  • Who funds CU BOULDER HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HILLEL JEWISH CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds CORNELL HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
  • Who funds KRISTOL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT BRANDEIS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT FSU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hillels of Georgia Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds Hillel at Binghamton Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maccabee Task Force F…Seed the Dream Founda…Combined Jewish Phila…Birthright Israel Fou…Israel on Campus Coal…The Jewish Federation…The Jewish Federation…Penny and Robert Sarv…Jewish Community Fede…Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…Dallas Jewish Communi…
Maccabee Task Force FoundationNV121.2× affinity56 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maccabee Task Force Foundation · Seed the Dream Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Birthright Israel Foundation · Israel on Campus Coalition Inc · The Jewish Federations of North America Inc · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · Penny and Robert Sarver Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 260%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Norwich University — 4% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
  • University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
  • Stetson University Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rollins College — 0% of income from government
  • Trinity College — 0% of income from government
  • Drew University — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
26get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 207 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home