· Public charity
Florida K of C Charities Inc
The FLORIDA K OF C CHARITIES INC.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $622,934 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $657,085 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $34,151 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $427k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $188k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOMEN'S HELP CENTER | $76,962 |
| BETA OF TITUSVILLE INC | $55,560 |
| RESOURCES FOR WOMEN | $55,560 |
| A CARING CENTER FOR WOMEN | $49,395 |
| NORTH RIVER CARE PREGNANCY CENTER | $42,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES- DIOCESE ST PETE | $38,900 |
| PREGNANCY SOLUTIONS | $37,300 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF FLORIDA | $33,427 |
| LIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC OF LAKE | $33,250 |
| LIFE CHOICES MEDICAL CLINIC | $32,000 |
| SANFORD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER | $26,755 |
| LIFE CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER | $22,900 |
| AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR MISSION | $15,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SEMINARY | $14,000 |
| SCHOTT MEMORIAL CENTER | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $914k · revenue +42%
- WHWOMEN'S HELP CENTER INC7× · 2017–2025 · $266k · revenue +87%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC5× · 2017–2025 · $207k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- CCCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUND OF SE FLone grant, 2019 · $300k
- KOKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS FLORIDA STATE COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $58k · revenue +218%
- PRPregnancy Resources Incone grant, 2020 · $57k · revenue -53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
To assist women with unplanned pregnancies.
Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.
Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…
To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.
The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies
Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.
To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.
The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Help Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Special Equestrians Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESOURCES FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY WOMAN WOMEN'S CLINICS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTYINC ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Roman Catholic Archdiocese Of Nassau FOUNDATION INC (RCAN FOUNDATION) ↗
- Who funds SANFORD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds JMJ LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE'S CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF PANAMA CITY INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CARELINE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELS AMONG US IN FLORIDA INCORPORATED DBA MY CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SCHOTT MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Alpha Center Inc ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS FLORIDA STATE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Resources Inc ↗
- Who funds BETA OF TITUSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER OF IRC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Florida Pregnancy Care Network Inc · Choose Life Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Mission Pre-Born Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · 4 US · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Florida K of C Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc — 12% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida — 5% of income from government
- Special Equestrians Inc — 2% of income from government
- Larc Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Arc Gateway Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Florida K of C Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Florida K of C Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.