· Public charity
Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc
Vitamin angels helps at-risk populations in need, specifically pregnant women, new mothers and children under five, gain access to life changing micronutrients.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $126,692,550 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $126,682,550 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOU NOUVO NEW DAY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $120M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING
Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING
Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING
Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING
Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING
Stated purpose: NUTRITION · DEWORMING
Stated purpose: OPERATIONS
Stated purpose: NUTRITION
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED3× · 2021–2023 · $236k · revenue +42%
- CICentral Illinois Foodbank Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $135k · revenue -13%
- CBCommunity Bridges2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- MFMicronutrient Forumone grant, 2023 · $145k · revenue -25%
- ITINTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA INCgraduated5× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +56%
- FHFAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL OF CENTRAL PA INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.
Consulting for pregnant women. community service referrals.
Help women who are pregnant by giving them options to save their baby.
The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.
To provide support for pregnant women
Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…
It is our mission to provide women with medical care and alternatives to abortion as we proclaim the hope of the Gospel.
Assistance to pregnant women in crisis, offering free pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, sti testing, counseling, education and referrals to aid the mother and father as advocates for the unborn. we empower life affirming choices.
Choices life resource center exists to glorify god by saving babies and empowering families to share in the abundant life god has offered to all his creation. we do this by providing educational opportunities, giving practical support, and…
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Aid Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Womens Resource Center of Natc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
195 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Micronutrient Forum ↗
- Who funds Central Illinois Foodbank Inc ↗
- Who funds INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL OF CENTRAL PA INC ↗
- Who funds Community Bridges ↗
- Who funds OKEECHOBEE COUNTY HEALTHOKEECHOBEE HEALTHY START COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Jou Nouvo - New Day Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Mission Pre-Born Inc · Care Net · Save the Storks · 4 US · Florida K of C Charities Inc · Direct Relief · Council for Life · Florida Pregnancy Care Network Inc · Vitamin Bridge · Americares Foundation Inc · Essential Access Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Health Programs Incorporated — 13% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.