Loading…
· Public charity
VITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC
Improve the health of at-risk populations, specifically pregnant women and children under five.
$127M
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of VITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
accessokeechobeehealthy startstart legislationfoodnutritioncare
2022
educationnutritioncare
2023
nutritionnutritionalcare
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$146M
Total assets
Largest grants
- JOU NOUVO NEW DAY$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$418k · 3 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
6
Total granted
$418k
$354k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+50%
+104%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Food & NutritionHealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS3× · 2021–2023 · $236k · revenue +90%
- CICENTRAL ILLINOIS FOOD BANK2× · 2021–2022 · $135k · revenue +12%
- CBCOMMUNITY BRIDGES WIC2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- MFMICRONUTRIENT FORUMgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $145k · revenue +482%
- ITINTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF AZgraduated5× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +56%
- FHFAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL CENTRAL PA INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +153%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Life Choices Medical Clinic
Life choices medical clinic exists to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregnancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a committment to excellence…
Unclassified
2
Life Choices Care
Life choices care exits to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a commitment to excellence so that we…
—
3
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center
The center provides counseling, ultrasounds and various other resources to pregnant mothers at no cost to the mothers.
Health
4
Life Choices Care Center
To provide support for pregnant women
Health
5
Pregnancy Care Center
To save lives & strengthen families by providing hope & help to women & men facing unplanned pregnancy via limited medical services, one-on-one coaching & education.
Health
6
First Choice Pregnancy Center Inc
Perform free pregnancy testing;perform ultrasound for expectant mothers;perform std testing for clients;post abortion counseling
Health
7
Abigail Women's Clinic - Pregnancy Outreach Center
Abigail Womens Clinic's mission is to provide free and confidential services, education,counseling, support, and encouragement to individuals allowing them to make healthy choices related to sexuality and childbearing from a Biblical point…
Health
8
Choices for Life Pregnancy Center Inc
Choices pregnancy center is a non-profit pregnancy resource center and clinic that provides pregnancy confirmation and support services for women, without charge, in a safe, confidential and compassionate manner. we provide education for…
—
9
Wise Choices Pregnancy Resource Center
Assistance to pregnant women in crisis, offering free pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, sti testing, counseling, education and referrals to aid the mother and father as advocates for the unborn. we empower life affirming choices.
Human Services
10
A Woman's Choice
Crisis pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
—
11
Life Choices Crisis Pregnancy Supp
Non-profit medical clinic educating and equipping individuals to make empowered decisions, providing pregnancy confirmation, and offering programs of prevention, intervention, and restoration.
Health
12
Life Choices Resource Center
Promoting the sanctity of human life by reaching out with christ's love through our pregnancy resource center, medical clinic, and sexual and relationship educational programs.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Solutions and Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Texas a&M Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.8%2/249
the rest of the field
11%
206,162/1,819,316
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
191 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
101
Early backer (in before they grew)
188/191
Grantees still filing
171/191
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$328,275Food & Nutrition$182,685Education$145,000Health$106,250Human Services$10,000International$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds MICRONUTRIENT FORUM ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF AZ ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH COUNCIL CENTRAL PA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY BRIDGES WIC ↗
- Who funds OKEECHOBEE HEALTHY START COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds JOU NOUVO NEW DAY ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES US ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT83.2× affinity53 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Mission Pre-Born Inc · Save the Storks · Care Net · 4 US · Council for Life · Direct Relief · Florida Pregnancy Care Network Inc · Florida K of C Charities Inc · Vitamin Bridge · Food Research & Action Center · Americares Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation VITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Community Health Programs Incorporated — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JOU NOUVO NEW DAY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +88% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 800227444 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on JOU NOUVO NEW DAY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc?
Find your warmest path to Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines