Skip to content
Save the Storks at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Save the Storks

We elevate the standards of care that make motherhood accessible by: 1) providing state of the art Mobile Medical Clinics, 2) supporting high-caliber women's health clinics, 3) empowering local organizations and churches to deliver a robust network of resources, and 4) offering a digital platform with 24-hour resources for women.

$1.5M
Granted FY2022
31
Grants FY2022
18
States reached
$144k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Save the Storks’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Servant Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 25 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Save the Storks named its own grantees at scale: 31 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
21
’18
32
’19
49
’20
31
’21
31
’22
23
’23
25
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.8MReligion$1.3MHuman Services$519kCivil Rights$97kInternational$30kYouth Development$11kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2022 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 31 grants below total $1,343,616, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,500,427 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $156,811 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $322k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $984k
$30,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Caring Families Pregnancy Services$144,285
Women's Resource Center$136,934
Every Mother's Advocate$130,000
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Northern California$122,984
Women's Care Center of Erie County$122,984
TruChoice$82,592
Pregnancy Care Center of Burke County$70,000
A Woman's Choice$65,428
Aspire Together$55,000
Women's Life Services$53,320
Bridge Women's Center$46,427
Living Help Center$35,000
Bright Hope Pregnancy Support Center$31,427
Crossroads Women's Clinic$30,000
Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $776k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Infinite Worth Project: $9k → 26%Life Centers of Ventura County: $30k → 10%Carenet Pregnancy Center of Canandaigua: $10k → 10%New Hope Family Services: $150k → 14%Women's Life Services: $53k → 20%Human Coalition: $31k → 5%Embrace Grace: $6k → 11%The Sparrows Nest maternity Home: $6k → 12%Northeast Texas Heart of Hope: $15k → 13%A Woman's Haven: $43k → 16%Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center: $7k → 17%The Cottage of Bartlesville: $12k → 14%First Choice Pregnancy Medical Center: $40k → 17%Catholic Charities Diocese of Palm Beach: $6k → 11%First Source for Women: $15k → 16%Hearbeats: $27k → 9%Newton Pregnancy Resource Center: $15k → 12%BlueBird Bus of Hope: $10k → 9%Abba's Arms Ministry: $24k → 10%Open Arms Pregnancy Center: $36k → 15%Heartbeat of Toledo: $5k → 18%Life of a Single Mom: $10k → 19%Centro Tepeyac Silver Spring Women's Center: $10k → 8%Any Woman Can: $61k → 16%First Choice Pregnancy Medical Center: $6k → 17%Hope Children's Home: $9k → 13%First Source for Women: $6k → 16%Hearbeats: $8k → 9%Abba's Arms: $24k → 10%Open Arms Pregnancy Center: $32k → 15%A Woman's Haven: $22k → 16%Foundations of Life Pregnancy Center: $28k → 13%Abba's Arms: $6k → 10%Abba's Arms Ministry: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
OR
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 79% of Save the Storks’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Save the Storkslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 54 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

54 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2022, 39 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
46

Total granted

$4.8M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+46%

Still filing today

94%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsReligionPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $295k · revenue +197% · 26% of their budget
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $260k · revenue +5%
  • AA
    A A COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $216k · revenue +16% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • AC
    ALPHA CLINICS
    one grant, 2020 · $169k · revenue -41%
  • PA
    PREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $118k · revenue +165%
  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $106k · revenue +410%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
2
Brenham Pregnancy Center

Brenham Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered organization serving women and families experiencing pregnancy related issues, from unplanned pregnancy to pregnancy loss. We provide life-affirming consultation, education, spiritual support,…

Health
3
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
4
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
—
5
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
6
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
7
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
8
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
9
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
10
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
11
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
12
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abbas Arms Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
128/130
Grantees still filing
90/130
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $259,500 · HealthPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INCA A COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER: $216,427 · HealthA A COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTERHope Center for Crisis Pregnancy dba Hope Womens Resource Clinic: $199,397 · HealthALPHA CLINICS: $169,000 · HealthWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $166,934 · HealthTruChoice Pregnancy Resource Center: $163,192 · HealthHorizon Pregnancy Center: $134,450 · HealthCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $132,470 · HealthCommunity Pregnancy Center of Pasadena: $129,942 · Health+49 more: $2,174,497 · Health+49 moreEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC: $165,400 · OtherEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INCCALVARY CHAPEL OF OLD BRIDGE: $151,293 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL OF OLD BRI…CARING FAMILIES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $144,285 · OtherCARING FAMILIES PREGNANCY…Agathos International: $141,024 · OtherAgathos International1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center Inc: $136,600 · Other1st Choice Pregnancy Reso…PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $119,950 · OtherPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERPREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGON: $117,687 · OtherPREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CE…LIFE ADVANCEMENT GROUP: $110,000 · OtherLIFE ADVANCEMENT GROUPSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $86,750 · OtherGateway Womens Resource Center: $85,894 · OtherReliance Center: $75,000 · OtherGOD'S RESOURCES INC: $69,225 · Other+26 more: $610,050 · Other+26 moreServant Foundation: $1,092,702 · ReligionServant FoundationEVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC: $295,000 · ReligionEVERY MOTHER'S ADVOC…Triad Coalition for Life: $118,976 · ReligionTriad Coalition for …+3 more: $82,000 · ReligionNEW HOPE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $155,527 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE F…OPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTER: $67,294 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS …A WOMANS HAVEN INC: $64,700 · Human ServicesA WOMANS H…ANY WOMAN CAN NP: $61,000 · Human ServicesANY WOMAN …ABBAS ARMS MINISTRY: $60,000 · Human ServicesABBAS ARMS…MORNING STAR INC: $53,320 · Human ServicesMORNING ST…FORT SMITH CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICESINC: $45,500 · Human ServicesFORT SMITH…HARBOUR HEALTH: $35,450 · Human ServicesHUMAN COALITION: $30,850 · Human ServicesGATE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesLife Centers of Ventura County: $30,000 · Human ServicesLIVING ALTERNATIVES INC: $30,000 · Human Services+16 more: $183,800 · Human Services+16 moreSOUTHWEST COALITION INC: $106,000 · Civil RightsDAYBREAK INC: $43,500 · Civil RightsBIRTH CHOICE OF SAN MARCOS: $42,452 · Civil RightsArise & Build Community Ministries: $37,400 · Civil RightsKERR COUNTY CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL: $25,200 · Civil RightsFAMILY LIFE SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $14,535 · Civil RightsOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $189,500 · Housing & ShelterABBAS HOUSE: $91,352 · PhilanthropySouth Texas Christian Ministries Medina County Christian Job Corps: $40,000 · Philanthropy
Health$3,745,809Other$2,013,158Religion$1,588,678Human Services$847,441Civil Rights$269,087Housing & Shelter$189,500Philanthropy$131,352

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetServant Foundation: $1,092,702 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY MOTHER'S ADVOCATE INC: $295,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $259,500 over 4y, 24% of budgetA A COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER: $216,427 over 2y, 26% of budgetHope Center for Crisis Pregnancy dba Hope Womens Resource Clinic: $199,397 over 4y, 18% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $189,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALPHA CLINICS: $169,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $166,934 over 2y, 35% of budgetEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC: $165,400 over 2y, 27% of budgetTruChoice Pregnancy Resource Center: $163,192 over 4y, 12% of budgetNEW HOPE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $155,527 over 2y, 30% of budgetCARING FAMILIES PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $144,285 over 1y, 51% of budget1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center Inc: $136,600 over 2y, 27% of budgetHorizon Pregnancy Center: $134,450 over 3y, 11% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $132,470 over 2y, 19% of budgetCommunity Pregnancy Center of Pasadena: $129,942 over 2y, 32% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY CENTER NFP: $124,527 over 2y, 38% of budgetWomen's Care Center of Erie County Inc: $122,984 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $119,950 over 5y, 14% of budgetTriad Coalition for Life: $118,976 over 2y, 36% of budgetPREGNANCY ALTERNATIVES CENTER DBA OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OREGON: $117,687 over 1y, 13% of budgetCoastal Pregnancy Care Center: $115,350 over 2y, 19% of budgetALBEMARLE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $113,700 over 2y, 26% of budgetCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $111,874 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetLIFE ADVANCEMENT GROUP: $110,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSOUTHWEST COALITION INC: $106,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCARENET PREGNANCY CENTER OF OKANOGAN COUNTY: $95,102 over 2y, 40% of budgetABBAS HOUSE: $91,352 over 2y, 31% of budgetHEARTREACH CENTER INC: $89,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetNEXT STEP RESOURCES CENTER: $87,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $86,750 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGateway Womens Resource Center: $85,894 over 1y, 41% of budgetHands Of Hope Tucson: $80,190 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetPUEBLO CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $74,320 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $72,177 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetLife Network: $72,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetA WOMENS CARE CENTER: $71,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $70,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetGOD'S RESOURCES INC: $69,225 over 2y, 15% of budgetOPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTER: $67,294 over 2y, 13% of budgetA WOMAN'S CHOICE INC: $65,428 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetA WOMANS HAVEN INC: $64,700 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetASPIRE TOGETHER INC: $62,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetANY WOMAN CAN NP: $61,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetABBAS ARMS MINISTRY: $60,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetALPHA PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $59,500 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetMORNING STAR INC: $53,320 over 1y, 34% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EAST TENNESSEE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…Vitamin Angel Allianc…Mission Pre-Born Inc4 USCarolina Pregnancy Ca…The Signatry Charitab…Servant FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…Care NetFlorida K of C Charit…God's GiftChristian Community F…
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT105.7× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Mission Pre-Born Inc · 4 US · Carolina Pregnancy Care Fellowship · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Care Net · Florida K of C Charities Inc · God's Gift · Christian Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Save the Storks funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Save the Storks. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Pregnancy Alternatives Center Dba Obria Medical Clinics Oregon: 38% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Choices Clinics Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Save the Storks’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home