Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Care Net

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Care Net offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered support through our life-affirming network of pregnancy centers, organizations, and individuals.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Human Services$3.0MHealth$437kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $17,296 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $28,496 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,296
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Care Net of Puget Sound$10,296
Hill Country Pregnancy Care Center$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%Life Choices Center: $9k → 20%Sav-a-Life Inc: $17k → 16%Parkville Women's Clinic: $9k → 8%Care Net of Southeastern Connecticut: $9k → 9%Hope Rising: $9k → 14%Choices Women's Center: $17k → 8%Life Choices Center: $8k → 20%Sav-A-Life Inc: $8k → 16%Parkville Women's Clinic: $8k → 8%Care Net of Southeastern Connecticut: $8k → 9%Hope Rising: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
WI
MI
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
NM
TN
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 20 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$3.3M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACH
    5× · 2018–2022 · $2.9M · revenue +309% · 50% of their budget
  • BC
    BAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +25%
  • AW
    A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • WH
    WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue +7%
  • FP
    Fredericksburg Pregnancy Centergraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue +27%
  • CW
    CASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
2
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
3
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
4
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
5
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

—
6
Birthchoice

Consulting for pregnant women. community service referrals.

—
7
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
8
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
9
Choices for Women Resource Center Inc

Choices life resource center exists to glorify god by saving babies and empowering families to share in the abundant life god has offered to all his creation. we do this by providing educational opportunities, giving practical support, and…

Human Services
10
Life Choices Resource Center Inc

To provide pregnancy testing (including ultrasound examinations), counseling, and referrals as needed (including post-abortion counseling) in our offices and through our 24-hour help-line.

—
11
Life Choices Pregnancy Center Inc

We are an outreach ministry of jesus christ committed to providing compassionate guidance, education, and help for all involved prior to, during, and following an unplanned pregnancy.

Health
12
Cross Timbers Pregnancy Care Center

Cross timbers pregnancy care center is a christian ministry dedicated to preserving the value of human life by providing abortion alternatives, practical assistance, and education to the cross timbers area.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Choice Women's Medical Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fredericksburg Pregnancy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr14%40%20–35yr15%57%35–55yr15%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr14%92%20–35yr15%8%35–55yr15%0%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,435

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACH — $2,890,000 · ReligionWTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACHBAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $33,500 · HealthBAKERSFIEL…A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC — $33,500 · HealthA WOMAN'S …FIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC — $33,500 · HealthFIRST CHOI…LAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $25,000 · HealthLAKESHORE …CASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH — $17,000 · HealthALTERNATIVES PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $17,000 · HealthFYNDOUT FREE PREGNANCY CENTER — $17,000 · HealthFirst Coast Womens Services Inc — $16,500 · HealthSKYLARK CLINIC INC — $16,500 · HealthCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC — $16,500 · HealthAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER — $16,500 · HealthAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc — $16,500 · Health+7 more — $61,296 · Health+7 moreSAV-A-LIFE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesFredericksburg Pregnancy Center — $17,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC — $16,500 · Human ServicesLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC — $16,500 · Human ServicesParkville Womens Clinic — $16,500 · Human ServicesHOPE RISING PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $16,500 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $26,000 · OtherEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC — $16,500 · OtherA CHOICE FOR LIFE INC — $16,500 · OtherFIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER INC — $16,500 · OtherAAA WOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $16,500 · OtherChoose Life Of North Alabama Inc — $8,000 · OtherWOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC — $17,000 · Civil Rights
Religion$2,890,000Health$320,296Human Services$108,000Other$100,000Civil Rights$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACH — $2,890,000 over 5y, 50% of budgetBAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $33,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetA WOMAN'S CHOICE INC — $33,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC — $33,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $26,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAV-A-LIFE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC — $17,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFredericksburg Pregnancy Center — $17,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH — $17,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetALTERNATIVES PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $17,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFYNDOUT FREE PREGNANCY CENTER — $17,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC — $16,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetFirst Coast Womens Services Inc — $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC — $16,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSKYLARK CLINIC INC — $16,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC — $16,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC — $16,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetA CHOICE FOR LIFE INC — $16,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetParkville Womens Clinic — $16,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER INC — $16,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE RISING PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $16,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER — $16,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAAA WOMEN'S SERVICES INC — $16,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc — $16,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF HOUSTON — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetChoose Life Of North Alabama Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER ROBERTS — $7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFirst Image — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBlue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…Vitamin Angel Allianc…American Endowment Fo…Mission Pre-Born Inc4 USNatl Christian Charit…Save the StorksThe Blackbaud Giving …Raymond James Charita…Shell USA Company Fou…Renaissance Charitabl…Vanguard Charitable E…
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT47.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Mission Pre-Born Inc · 4 US · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Save the Storks · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Care Net funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home