Skip to content
Redf at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Redf

Redefine alliance invests in businesses that reveal and reinforce the talent of people breaking through barriers to employment.

$6.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
25
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$17MHousing & Shelter$4.9MYouth Development$3.9MCrime & Legal$3.2MCommunity Improvement$3.0MEnvironment$2.5MHuman Services$1.1MFood & Nutrition$755kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $734k
  • $50k–250k40 grants · $5.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMERGE CONNECTICUT INC$250,000
BIKES NOT BOMBS INC$236,500
RISE UP INDUSTRIES$210,000
PEOPLE ADVANCING REINTEGRATION INC$209,850
ALL SQUARE$205,000
WILDFLYER COFFEE$175,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$175,000
GROUND UP PDX$174,900
URBAN ALCHEMY$170,000
GLOBAL NEIGHBORHOOD$152,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$150,000
CONBODY INC$150,000
OIC OF SOUTH FLORIDA$150,000
WELD SEATTLE$150,000
SEEDS OF CHANGE LLC$140,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LC & Lillie Cox Haven of Hope: $20k → 9%MAKE Projects: $20k → 11%Parents by Choice: $20k → 12%Neighborhood Industries: $180k → 19%LIVING PONO PROJECT: $40k → 9%TOUCH A HEART: $175k → 9%The Other Ones Foundation: $20k → 10%Crossroads Campus: $175k → 14%Millionair Club Charity Inc: $195k → 9%GLOBAL NEIGHBORHOOD: $152k → 12%Neighborhood Industries: $100k → 19%The Empowerment Plan: $50k → 21%Crossroads Campus: $100k → 14%Millionair Club Charity Inc: $145k → 9%GLOBAL NEIGHBORHOOD: $146k → 12%VEHICLES FOR CHANGE: $100k → 11%Neighborhood Industries: $100k → 19%CROSSROADS CAMPUS: $100k → 14%Millionair Club Charity Inc: $130k → 9%Neighborhood Industries: $75k → 19%CrossRoads Pets: $25k → 14%Millionair Club Charity Inc: $100k → 9%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $175k → 14%Neighborhood Industries: $30k → 19%EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $100k → 20%Millionair Club Charity Inc: $25k → 9%CHIFRESH KITCHEN LWCA: $41k → 14%EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $100k → 20%ANNIECANNONS INC: $41k → 10%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $210k → 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $100k → 14%Mile High Ministries: $105k → 12%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $100k → 11%Mile High Ministries: $25k → 12%New Moms Inc: $125k → 14%New Moms Inc: $100k → 14%New Moms Inc: $85k → 14%New Moms Inc: $75k → 14%Appetite For Change: $30k → 11%New Moms Inc: $40k → 14%Pioneer Human Services: $175k → 9%Pioneer Human Services: $100k → 9%Pioneer Human Services: $100k → 9%Mile High Ministries: $60k → 10%Pioneer Human Services: $80k → 9%Pioneer Human Services: $75k → 9%Pioneer Human Services: $40k → 9%Downtown Women's Center: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 32% of Redf’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 18%.

Redflessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35M · 107 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

107 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
123

Total granted

$35M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+25%

Still filing today

83%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $901k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +261%
  • JV
    JUMA VENTURES INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +119%
  • CC
    CHRYSALIS CENTER
    5× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • RI
    REDF IMPACT INVESTING FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.3M · revenue +36% · 98% of their budget
  • DS
    Downtown Streets Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $180k · revenue 0%
  • FH
    FARMING HOPE
    one grant, 2024 · $170k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The WorkWell Partnership

The WorkWell Partnership operates a four-week job training program consisting of training and counseling, with qualified trainers, mentors, and advocates helping to prepare formerly incarcerated citizens for employment that can be…

Education
2
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
3
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
4
Would-Works Inc

At Would Works, we are committed to help youth with barriers to employment to heal, learn new skills, grow their confidence and prepare for their next opportunities, by providing paid, creative, hands-on woodworking training in a…

Human Services
5
Elevated Community Development Corporation

Training and jobs for exoffenders

Employment
6
Se Works Inc

Se works' mission is to strengthen the economic health and well being of our diverse community by facilitating successful connections between job seekers and employers.

Employment
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Activate Work Inc

We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.

Human Services
9
ReWork Richmond Inc

Our mission is to empower underemployed adults living in Richmond's East End to obtain the skills and necessary support to qualify for and ultimately gain thriving careers. Our commitment is to partner with each participant until they are…

Employment
10
Project Restart Inc

Our mission is to help people return to independent living and be self-sufficient. The HWH model is partner based and encompasses housing, mental health services, workforce training and employment. This supportive structure and services…

Housing & Shelter
11
Good Food Works Inc
Human Services
12
Code to Work Inc

An employer-led initiative aimed at transforming the hiring process. we use a skills-based approach to identify, train and hire talent. the traditional credentials-based focus must evolve to give all qualified job seekers a chance to prove…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social Enterprise and Training Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Parents By Choice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

202 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 202 of the 251 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
62
Early backer (in before they grew)
195/202
Grantees still filing
144/202
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $1,362,999 · EmploymentCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTU…JUMA VENTURES INC: $1,095,551 · EmploymentJUMA VENTURES INCGOODWILL TEMPORARY SERVICES INC: $865,436 · EmploymentGOODWILL TEMPORARY SERVICES I…The Cara Program: $675,000 · EmploymentThe Cara ProgramCONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC: $613,619 · EmploymentCONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY …FARESTART: $595,000 · EmploymentFARESTARTThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc: $480,300 · EmploymentJOBS FOUNDATION: $470,000 · EmploymentPERALTA SERVICE CORPORATION: $365,000 · EmploymentFARMING HOPE: $350,000 · Employment+25 more: $3,397,664 · Employment+25 moreCHRYSALIS CENTER: $1,060,000 · OtherCHRYSALIS CENTERGOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $933,930 · OtherGOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY INCMORE THAN WORDS INC: $755,000 · OtherOpportunity Construction LLC: $560,000 · OtherCentral City Concern: $690,000 · Other+91 more: $11,135,958 · Other+91 moreUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $605,000 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTHWE…PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC: $570,250 · Human ServicesPIONEER HUMAN …NEIGHBORHOOD INDUSTRIES: $525,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD I…NEW MOMS INC: $457,198 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INCGLOBAL NEIGHBORHOOD: $412,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL NEIGHBO…THE CROSSROADS CAMPUS: $400,000 · Human ServicesTHE CROSSROADS…DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $400,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN…Rise Up Industries: $330,000 · Human ServicesRise Up Indust…EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $220,000 · Human ServicesTOUCH A HEART INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesMILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $190,000 · Human Services+15 more: $595,000 · Human Services+15 moreREDF IMPACT INVESTING FUND: $1,300,000 · Community ImprovementORION INDUSTRIES: $750,000 · Community ImprovementURBAN ALCHEMY: $526,159 · Community ImprovementTHE MADE INSTITUTE: $121,000 · Community Improvement+9 more: $416,000 · Community ImprovementHomeward Bound of Marin: $460,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $452,000 · Housing & ShelterCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $434,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE DOE FUND INC: $395,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $265,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $85,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE NETWORK FOR BETTER FUTURES DBA BETTER FUTURES MINNESOTA: $631,000 · Crime & LegalWELD SEATTLE: $570,000 · Crime & LegalEMERGE CONNECTICUT INC: $500,000 · Crime & Legal+9 more: $333,000 · Crime & LegalUTEC Inc: $600,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCA INC: $460,000 · Youth DevelopmentFREEDOM A LA CART: $370,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $190,000 · Youth Development+7 more: $171,000 · Youth Development
Employment$10,270,569Other$15,134,888Human Services$4,914,448Community Improvement$3,113,159Housing & Shelter$2,091,500Crime & Legal$2,034,000Youth Development$1,791,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $1,362,999 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetREDF IMPACT INVESTING FUND: $1,300,000 over 1y, 98% of budgetJUMA VENTURES INC: $1,095,551 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER: $1,060,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $933,930 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGOODWILL TEMPORARY SERVICES INC: $865,436 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC: $755,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetORION INDUSTRIES: $750,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCentral City Concern: $690,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Cara Program: $675,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTHE NETWORK FOR BETTER FUTURES DBA BETTER FUTURES MINNESOTA: $631,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC: $613,619 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $605,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetUTEC Inc: $600,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetFARESTART: $595,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC: $570,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWELD SEATTLE: $570,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetURBAN ALCHEMY: $526,159 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD INDUSTRIES: $525,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetINNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC: $500,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetEMERGE CONNECTICUT INC: $500,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetBIKES NOT BOMBS INC: $491,700 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc: $480,300 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetURBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $480,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetCHALLENGE PROGRAM INC: $470,100 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetJOBS FOUNDATION: $470,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN PITTSBURGH: $470,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $460,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetROCA INC: $460,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $457,198 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $452,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCIVIC WORKS INC: $450,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $443,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $434,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT RETURN INC: $430,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetEVANSTON REBUILDING WAREHOUSE: $415,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetGLOBAL NEIGHBORHOOD: $412,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetTHE CROSSROADS CAMPUS: $400,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $400,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $395,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE: $392,400 over 3y, 11% of budgetFREEDOM A LA CART: $370,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetPERALTA SERVICE CORPORATION: $365,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $361,460 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetFARMING HOPE: $350,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetRise Up Industries: $330,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetPEOPLE ADVANCING REINTEGRATION INC: $329,850 over 3y, 11% of budgetALL SQUARE: $325,000 over 3y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds REDF IMPACT INVESTING FUND ↗
  • Who funds JUMA VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL TEMPORARY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MORE THAN WORDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORION INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds THE NETWORK FOR BETTER FUTURES DBA BETTER FUTURES MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds UTEC Inc ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WELD SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ALCHEMY ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds INNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGE CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKES NOT BOMBS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Knowledge House Fellowship Inc ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds JOBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds ROCA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GRID ALTERNATIVES GREATER LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT RETURN INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANSTON REBUILDING WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL NEIGHBORHOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jacques Pepin Foundat…Stand Together Founda…Tipping Point Communi…FarestartThe Harry and Jeanett…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The James Irvine Foun…The Morris Stulsaft F…Rockefeller Philanthr…Weingart FoundationNational Basketball A…The San Francisco Fou…
Jacques Pepin Foundation TheRI34.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jacques Pepin Foundation The · Stand Together Foundation · Tipping Point Community · Farestart · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The James Irvine Foundation · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Weingart Foundation · National Basketball Association Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Redf funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Redf. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Oic of South Florida Inc: 89% of income from government
  • City Seed Inc: 87% of income from government
  • Roca Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Maryland Reentry Resource Center: 77% of income from government
  • Civic Works Inc: 63% of income from government
  • Emerge Connecticut Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Utec Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Havenly: 40% of income from government
  • Challenge Program Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Interseminarian - Project Place Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Root Ns Inc: 26% of income from government
  • More Than Words Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Stone Soup Pdx: 20% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Vehicles for Change Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Bikes Not Bombs Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Forge City Works Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Humanim Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
71report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 251 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Redf’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home