· Public charity
Jacques Pepin Foundation The
The jacques pepin foundation promotes jacques generosity and passion for cooking by supporting individuals that seek, and organizations that create pathways to sucess through culinary professionalism, skills and techniques.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $345,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $369,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k27 grants · $295k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KITCHEN OF PURPOSE | $50,000 |
| CATALYST KITCHENS NETWORK | $25,000 |
| FOOD EDUCATION FUND | $15,000 |
| PROJECT RENEWAL INC | $15,000 |
| WORK OPTIONS | $10,000 |
| GROUNDWORK KITCHEN PAUL'S PLACE | $10,000 |
| SILVER FORK CENTER ON HALSTED | $10,000 |
| ROOT NS | $10,000 |
| MOSHOLU MONTEFIORE COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| FORGE CITY WORKS | $10,000 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| FARM FRESH RI | $10,000 |
| YWCA EVANSTONNORTH SHORE | $10,000 |
| RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY KITCHEN PITTSBURGH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLA COCINA VA3× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +3%
- MEMISSION EDGE SAN DIEGO2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +46%
- HBHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD4× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- TMTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +18%
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITYone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +20%- TJTHE JACQUES PEPIN LEGACY FUNDone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -85%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To rebuild the lives of people in need in anne arundel county through service and compassion by providing shelter, preventing homelessness, and empowering individuals as they work toward self-sufficiency.
When adults have a second chance and are able to make a successful transition to employment and have ongoing access to further education to increase their economic opportunities, they improve not only their own lives but those of their…
Creating community through healthy food access to address food insecurity.
Equipping youth to rise from hardship through culinary training and job placement. Youth at Sprouts are paired with a chef mentor and wraparound program to develop the vocational skills needed to secure and maintain a culinary job.…
We use food to change lives and build healty communities. our foodservice job-training programs help people with barriers to employment achieve self-sufficiency by marrying their talents to the needs of the community.
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
Providing food for people who are hungry, conversation for people who are lonely, rest for people who are struggling, and a voice for people in need.
Founded in 1877, community work services helps people who face barriers to work obtain employment and achieve greater self sufficiency through innovative job training, placement and support services.
Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifes Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jacques Pepin Legacy Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds LA COCINA VA ↗
- Who funds MISSION EDGE SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT RENEWAL INC ↗
- Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds EDWINS LEADERSHIP & RESTAURANT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CATALYST KITCHENS ↗
- Who funds Grand Avenue Economic Community Dev ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
- Who funds FOOD EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Together We Bake ↗
- Who funds PAUL'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds ARC BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA EvanstonNorth Shore ↗
- Who funds LIFES KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds THE GENESIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds FORGE CITY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE JACQUES PEPIN LEGACY FUND ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF BAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA ON MAIN STREET ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROOT NS INC ↗
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds THE PROSPECT KC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Redf · Farestart · Td Charitable Foundation · The National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation · The Allstate Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Ann B Zekauskas Family Foundation Inc · Journey for Good Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Connelly Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Amica Companies Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jacques Pepin Foundation The funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- Paul's Place Inc — 29% of income from government
- Root Ns Inc — 26% of income from government
- Stone Soup Pdx — 20% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Forge City Works Inc — 1% of income from government
- Literacy Volunteers of Greater Hartford Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jacques Pepin Foundation The?
Find your warmest path to Jacques Pepin Foundation The through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.