Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Housing Assistance Council

The exempt purpose is to improve housing conditions for the rural poor, with emphasis on the poorest of the poor in the most rural places.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
25
States reached
$540k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$4.5MCommunity Improvement$649kHuman Services$427kEnvironment$138kRecreation & Sports$108kPublic Benefit$64kReligion$48kEmployment$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 41 grants below total $2,235,966 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,643,776 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $407,810 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $540k
$24,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY$540,000
NEIGHBORHOOD NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION$216,000
TUNICA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALITION$153,004
PEOPLE'S SELF-HELP HOUSING CORP$148,500
KENTUCKY MOUNTAIN LAND TITLE INC$117,000
METRO NATIONAL TITLE$108,000
BUSINESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,413
TENNESSEE COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION$67,500
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE$63,000
ADULTS & YOUTH UNITED DEVELOPMENT ASSOC$52,600
NAVAJO TOWNSITE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$50,000
TUNICA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALITION$50,000
COCOPAH INDIAN HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT$50,000
ELISHA MINISTRIES$50,000
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $470k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 11%ADULTS & YOUTH UNITED DEVELOPMENT ASSOC: $53k → 21%SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL HOUSING & COMMUNITY: $24k → 26%HOME WORKS OF AMERICA: $24k → 16%LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $24k → 14%COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA: $24k → 17%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $24k → 9%HOME WORKS OF AMERICA: $24k → 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $29k → 12%CHESAPEAKE HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAM INC: $32k → 10%WESTERN MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION: $24k → 14%AYUDA INC: $24k → 21%LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $6k → 14%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $24k → 9%REBULDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA INC: $24k → 12%WESTERN MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION: $6k → 14%ADULTS & YOUTH UNITED DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $24k → 21%REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA: $20k → 12%ADULTS & YOUTH UNITED DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $24k → 21%ADULTS & YOUTH UNITED DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $6k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
KY
WV
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 44 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
31

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+25%

Still filing today

91%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HD
    HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $208k · revenue +87%
  • CC
    CREATIVE COMPASSION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $154k · revenue +63%
  • AI
    AYUDA INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $131k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • SE
    Self-Help Enterprisesgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $392k · revenue +159%
  • RH
    Rural Housing Development Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $230k · revenue +133%
  • CC
    Community Concepts Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $135k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Hub

Building homes working families can afford. We are dedicated to: providing new, affordable homes to residents in the South Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee; preparing future and current homeowners to both acquire and maintain a safe and…

Housing & Shelter
2
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
3
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat for Humanity of Central Arkansas Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
5
Home Team Housing

To provide housing to low income families and provide low cost building materials to new homeowner and the community.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
7
Habitat for Humanity of Bucks County Inc

Building Communities, Empowering Families

Housing & Shelter
8
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter
9
Coos County Habitat for Humanity

Construction of homes for low income families. homes built with volunteer labor and sold at cost.

—
10
Hart County Habitat for Humanity

Hart County Habitat for Humanity works in partnership with God, volunteers, and responsible families in need, to build a stronger community by creating decent affordable housing.

—
11
Siouxland Habitat for Humanity

To provide affordable housing for low-income families

—
12
Habitat for Humanity International Chemung County

Chemung county habitat is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing locally and worldwide through constructing, rehabilitating and preserving homes; by advocating for fair and just housing policies; and by providing training and access…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Works Inc and the most unlike its peers is Strategic Grant Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Environmental Conservation …Senior Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsYouth Development ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportMilitary Veterans Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%46%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/100
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,465

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/81
Grantees still filing
55/81
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEIGHBORHOOD NONPROFIT HOUSING CORP — $567,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPSelf-Help Enterprises — $391,500 · Housing & ShelterSelf-Help EnterprisesRural Housing Development Corporation — $229,500 · Housing & ShelterRural Housing Development CorporationHOUSING DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC — $207,500 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INCCREATIVE COMPASSION INC — $154,461 · Housing & ShelterCREATIVE COMPASSION INCPEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP — $148,500 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORPUNIVERSAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIO — $132,108 · Housing & ShelterNEW FOUNDATIONS DEVELOPMENT INC — $102,600 · Housing & Shelter+20 more — $729,991 · Housing & Shelter+20 moreCHICAGO TITLE COMPANY — $540,000 · OtherCHICAGO TITLE COMPANYCommunity Concepts Inc — $135,000 · OtherCommunity Concepts IncCOMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM — $121,500 · OtherKENTUCKY MOUNTAIN LAND TITLE INC — $117,000 · OtherB&GC of White Mountain Apache — $108,000 · OtherMETRO NATIONAL TITLE — $108,000 · OtherBUSINESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $100,413 · OtherNORTHWEST REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY — $91,000 · OtherNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES — $89,883 · Other+40 more — $869,673 · Other+40 moreTunica County Community Development Coalition Inc — $203,004 · Community ImprovementTunica Cou…TENNESSEE COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION — $67,500 · Community ImprovementTENNESSEE …BOGALUSA REBIRTH — $54,000 · Community ImprovementBOGALUSA R…GROW SOUTH DAKOTA — $54,000 · Community ImprovementGROW SOUTH…NATIVE PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE PAR…TANGI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORA — $32,993 · Community ImprovementTANGI COMM…NORTHEAST SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC CORPORATION — $30,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHEAST …MAGNOLIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $30,000 · Community ImprovementMAGNOLIA C…THE LAKOTA FUND INCORPORATED — $30,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LAKOTA…AYUDA INC — $130,600 · Human ServicesREBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA INC — $73,000 · Human ServicesGREENHOUSE MINISTRIES — $48,000 · Human ServicesHOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC — $48,000 · Human ServicesCHESAPEAKE HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAM — $32,000 · Human ServicesLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $30,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesWESTERN MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $24,000 · Human ServicesJerry Ambrose Veterans Council of Mohave County — $54,000 · Public BenefitTHE VETERANS' PLACE INC — $30,000 · Public BenefitREBUILD UPSTATE — $48,000 · ReligionMS CENTER FOR POLICE & SHERIFFS — $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Housing & Shelter$2,663,160Other$2,280,469Community Improvement$551,497Human Services$475,600Public Benefit$84,000Religion$48,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD NONPROFIT HOUSING CORP — $567,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSelf-Help Enterprises — $391,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRural Housing Development Corporation — $229,500 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetHOUSING DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC — $207,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTunica County Community Development Coalition Inc — $203,004 over 1y, 25% of budgetCREATIVE COMPASSION INC — $154,461 over 5y, 17% of budgetPEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP — $148,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Concepts Inc — $135,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIO — $132,108 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetAYUDA INC — $130,600 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM — $121,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNEW FOUNDATIONS DEVELOPMENT INC — $102,600 over 4y, 13% of budgetNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES — $89,883 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SARATOGA COUNTY INC — $78,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA INC — $73,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetTENNESSEE COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION — $67,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Coachella Valley Housing Coalition — $67,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRED FEATHER DEVELOPMENT GROUP — $54,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBOGALUSA REBIRTH — $54,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetJerry Ambrose Veterans Council of Mohave County — $54,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF FAYETTE COUNTY — $54,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGROW SOUTH DAKOTA — $54,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetElisha Ministries Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetNATIVE PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNAVAJO TOWNSITE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $50,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetGREENHOUSE MINISTRIES — $48,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetREBUILD UPSTATE — $48,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC — $48,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetGOOD WORKS INC — $44,891 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSouthern Appalachian Labor School Foundation Inc — $44,726 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc — $42,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTRANSYLVANIA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $36,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTANGI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORA — $32,993 over 2y, 20% of budgetCHESAPEAKE HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAM — $32,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHEAST SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC CORPORATION — $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMILFORD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGUADALUPE ECONOMIC SERVICES CORPORATION — $30,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBethlehem Farm Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE VETERANS' PLACE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $30,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMS CENTER FOR POLICE & SHERIFFS — $30,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWESTERN MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LAKOTA FUND INCORPORATED — $30,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community …Neighborhood Reinvest…Habitat for Humanity …Wells Fargo FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Mufg Union Bank Found…Rebuilding Together I…Federation of Appalac…BBVA FoundationUnited Community Bank…Opportunity Finance N…Local Initiatives Sup…
Enterprise Community Partners IncMD32.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Rebuilding Together Inc · Federation of Appalachian Housing Enterprises Inc · BBVA Foundation · United Community Bank Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · Local Initiatives Support Corporation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Housing Assistance Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Florida Non-Profit Housing Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Ocean Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp — 12% of income from government
  • Pensacola Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home