Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Republic Services Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Housing & Shelter$9.5MHuman Services$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.4MPublic Benefit$1.0MFood & Nutrition$675kEmployment$509kCommunity Improvement$424kYouth Development$385kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+7 grants · $1.8M
$125,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO$250,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO$250,000
A WIDER CIRCLE$250,000
MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM$250,000
FOOD LIFELINE$250,000
GOODWILL FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTHERN INDIANA$250,000
BARROW COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250,000
UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC$200,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS$200,000
DALLAS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$175,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC$150,000
HOUSTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$125,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC$125,000
CAPITAL TREES$125,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $553k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mid Williamette Family YMCA: $250k → 13%Pope Francis Center: $200k → 21%Project Marilyn: $3k → 13%REBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN: $100k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 11 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +124% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
56

Total granted

$3.5M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+12%

Still filing today

91%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO
    4× · 2020–2024 · $970k · revenue +304% · 31% of their budget
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO
    2× · 2021–2024 · $390k · revenue +35%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    2× · 2023–2024 · $350k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rebuilding Together - San Diego

To renovate and preserve affordable homeownership for low income homeowners and revitalize neighborhoods throughout san diego.

Housing & Shelter
2
Rebuilding Together of Washington Dc

Volunteer teams rehabilitate homes for low-income elderly and disabledhomeowners, veterans, and families with children, as well as nonprofitfacilities such as schools, shelters, and community service organizations. all work is performed by…

—
3
Habitat for Humanity - Midohio

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity-midohio brings people together to inspire hope, build homes, empower families, and develop communities.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Baton Rouge Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater baton rouge builds and renovates houses in partnership with the community. we provide opportunities for families in need to purchase their own homes and improve their lives. we help build the community by…

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Nashville

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
7
Rebuilding Together Baltimore Inc

Repairing homes, revitalizing communities and rebuilding lives.

Housing & Shelter
8
Habitat for Humanity of Bucks County Inc

Building Communities, Empowering Families

Housing & Shelter
9
Habitat for Humanity of Tompkins & Cortland Counties

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope and realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity of tompkins and…

—
10
Habitat for Humanity Capital Region Inc

To improve our communities by providing and maintaining safe, healthy, affordable homeownership opportunities for low-to-moderate income community members, in partnership with volunteers and organizations throughout the community.

Housing & Shelter
11
Homes Build Hope Inc

To alleviate the cycle of homelessness by replacing deteriorated properties and providing low income individuals and families with decent, safe, affordable housing options. the purpose is to contribute to the quality of life in communities…

Housing & Shelter
12
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento Inc

Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento is the local, independent affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International. We are locally governed, raise funds, and build locally in Sacramento and Yolo CountiesFounded in 1985, Habitat for…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Nashville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%48%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/72
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,493

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/69
Grantees still filing
46/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREBUILDING TOGETHER — $1,000,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHERCITY OF PHOENIX — $1,000,000 · OtherCITY OF PHOENIXNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION — $1,000,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATIONDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $350,000 · Other+47 more — $4,505,069 · Other+47 moreREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO — $970,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHIC…REBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO — $390,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTORebuilding Together - Twin Cities — $335,000 · Housing & ShelterRebuilding Together - Twin Cit…CHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterCHN HOUSING PARTNERSRebuilding Together Houston — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterRebuilding Together HoustonREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHERN NEVADA — $215,000 · Housing & ShelterNEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterCHWC INC — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterLAFAYETTE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterAvenue Community Development Corporation — $162,000 · Housing & Shelter+12 more — $1,142,000 · Housing & Shelter+12 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,000,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $125,000 · InternationalREBUILDING TOGETHER - ST LOUIS — $200,000 · Community ImprovementBinghampton Development Corporation — $180,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION — $150,000 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO DENVER INC — $125,000 · Community ImprovementGEORGIA STREET COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementMid-Willamette Family YMCA — $250,000 · Human ServicesPOPE FRANCIS CENTER — $200,000 · Human ServicesREBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN INC — $100,000 · Human Services+1 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesURBAN CORPS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $250,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · EmploymentREBUILDING TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS — $350,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION — $120,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,855,069Housing & Shelter$4,514,000International$1,125,000Community Improvement$680,000Human Services$553,000Employment$500,000Philanthropy$480,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO CHICAGO — $970,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO — $390,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $350,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS — $350,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetRebuilding Together - Twin Cities — $335,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA — $250,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetRebuilding Together Houston — $250,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetEAGLE RIVER RECREATION ASSOC INC — $250,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM — $250,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMid-Willamette Family YMCA — $250,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetURBAN CORPS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC — $250,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHERN NEVADA — $215,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetNEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC — $200,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHWC INC — $200,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER - ST LOUIS — $200,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetBrackens Kitchen Inc — $200,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetPOPE FRANCIS CENTER — $200,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $200,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER ATLANTA INC — $200,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetBinghampton Development Corporation — $180,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation — $162,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc — $160,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetRebuilding Together Peninsula — $150,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PITTSBURGH — $150,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetRebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte — $150,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFAMICOS FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC — $140,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PACIFIC NW — $135,000 over 2y, 42% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $125,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCAPITAL TREES — $125,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER METRO DENVER INC — $125,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetHouston Habitat for Humanity Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER BATON ROUGE INC — $125,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER VALLEY OF THE SUN INC — $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDreamKey Partners Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - QUAD CITIES INC — $61,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rebuilding Together I…Charities Aid Foundat…Wells Fargo FoundationHabitat for Humanity …Neighborhood Reinvest…THDF II Inc DBA The H…The Kresge FoundationEnterprise Community …Mufg Union Bank Found…Enterprise Holdings F…Td Charitable Foundat…Centerpoint Energy Fo…
Rebuilding Together IncDC40.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rebuilding Together Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Wells Fargo Foundation · Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · The Kresge Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Republic Services Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Newvue Communities Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of New Castle County — 21% of income from government
  • Mid-Willamette Family Ymca — 17% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
  • The Neighborhood Developers Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Republic Services Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Republic Services Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home