Loading…
Loading…
Texas · Nonprofit
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC (Texas) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $4,477,630 in grants to it, the largest being REBUILDING TOGETHER INC ($4,187,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 7,122 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,122 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2020
$29 from 1 funders in 2023, up from $235k and 2 in 2017.
1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 7 funders by total. Association, not causation.
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 96% · 2018 82% · 2019 100% · 2020 97% · 2021 80% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC draws 94% of its grant income from funders outside Texas — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2020 (financials across 2020–2020), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing