Skip to content
Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they serve; strengthening and improving health systems; providing disaster and humanitarian relief and…

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$374k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$14MHealth$3.5MEducation$245kHuman Services$165kPublic Benefit$100k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $952,144, the rows itemized in this filing. The $21,441,980 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,489,836 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $507k
  • $250k+1 grant · $374k
$77,665
Median grant
6
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL LLC$374,436
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$180,130
THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE$132,061
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC$117,608
IBNISINA FOUNDATION$77,665
ACCESS TO RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE$34,961
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC$14,239
CREATIVE WAYS THERAPY$12,000
SOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER$9,044
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $98k → 11%EL MILAGRO CLINIC (MILAGRO): $76k → 27%COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $82k → 23%ELMILAGRO: $50k → 27%EL MILAGRO CLINIC (MILAGRO): $39k → 27%ACCESS TO RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $35k → 14%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL: $973k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
RI
CA
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $21M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$11M · 54% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION

Russia and Neighboring States$4.0M · 20% · 129 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION

Sub-Saharan Africa$2.1M · 10% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION

Middle East and North Africa$1.7M · 8% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION

East Asia and the Pacific$896k · 4% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$578k · 3% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION

Central America and the Caribbean$45k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.2M · 22 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
20

Total granted

$9.2M
$7.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-7%

Still filing today

73%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $518k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $664k · revenue +69% · 66% of their budget
  • IS
    IBN SINA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $559k · revenue +11%
  • SC
    SWLA CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $461k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • FA
    FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2.3M · revenue +8%
  • ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $973k · revenue +42%
  • PS
    POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $833k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kalihi-Palama Health Center (Hale Ho'ola Hou)

To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.

—
2
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
3
Doctors for You International Co Vistex

To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.

Health
4
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
5
African American Mens Health Clinic

Bmhc is a no wrong-door safety net program for men of color. our patients receive a head-to-toe assessment to address all possible concerns which will inform our health care professionals of the current state of your health. any validated…

Health
6
Spring Branch Community Health Center

To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.

Health
7
Global Health Teams

Medical care and healthcare related support and education to under served or marginalized people throughout the world.

Unclassified
8
Healthcare Access Worldwide Inc

Healthcare Access Worldwide, Inc. (HAWI) is the first of its kind, comprehensive healthcare resource center. This is a place where all issues pertaining to health, wellness and disease can be discussed freely and openly. HAWI continues to…

Health
9
Health Through Walls Inc

HtW was created to assists prisons in resource poor countries test treat and implement measures to control and stop the spread of contagious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, other STI's, TB, Cholera, COVID-19 and other emerging infectious…

International
10
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
11
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
12
Access Health Africa

Access Health Africa's medical service programming focuses on community-level interventions. Due to the decentralized nature of life in Malawi and the overburdened formal health sector, effective interventions happen at the community level…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health for All Inc; the most unlike its peers is Very Important Projects Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
20/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,714,093 · HealthINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INCFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $2,314,271 · HealthFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS IN…ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS: $663,802 · HealthALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICSIBN SINA FOUNDATION INC: $558,900 · HealthIBN SINA FOUNDATION INCMOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY: $433,705 · HealthHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $354,096 · HealthBEXAR COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $308,037 · Health+10 more: $1,086,887 · Health+10 moreGEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK INC: $1,965,833 · OtherGEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK IN…POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $832,952 · OtherPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONALSWLA CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICES: $461,098 · OtherSWLA CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICESARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL LLC: $374,436 · OtherARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL LLCSAN JOSE CLINIC: $364,797 · OtherSAN JOSE CLINICUNITED HEALTH PARTNER: $361,897 · OtherUNITED HEALTH PARTNERCAPACITY PATH LLC: $352,256 · OtherCAPACITY PATH LLCFOUNDATION FOR BETTER EDUCATION DBA CITY MEDICAL CENTER: $238,056 · Other+8 more: $433,389 · Other+8 moreCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $806,152 · InternationalCHILDFUND I…MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $563,659 · InternationalMANAGEMENT …SRD FOUNDATION: $366,382 · InternationalSRD FOUNDAT…GET UP PROJECT: $104,784 · InternationalGET UP PROJ…ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC: $972,547 · Human ServicesPOWER TO DECIDE: $164,801 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $97,810 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $82,096 · Human Services+1 more: $40,214 · Human ServicesBROWN UNIVERSITY: $301,468 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $131,847 · Community ImprovementUniversity of Chicago: $245,143 · EducationVERY IMPORTANT PROJECTS FUND: $26,052 · Youth Development
Health$8,433,791Other$5,384,714International$1,840,977Human Services$1,357,468Community Improvement$433,315Education$245,143Youth Development$26,052

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,714,093 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $2,314,271 over 1y, 19% of budgetGEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK INC: $1,965,833 over 2y, 72% of budgetST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC: $972,547 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $832,952 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $806,152 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS: $663,802 over 2y, 66% of budgetMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $563,659 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIBN SINA FOUNDATION INC: $558,900 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSWLA CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICES: $461,098 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY: $433,705 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetSRD FOUNDATION: $366,382 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $354,096 over 1y, 10% of budgetBEXAR COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $308,037 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $301,468 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $245,143 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLone Star Assoc Charitable Clinics: $222,719 over 2y, 44% of budgetSMITHVILLE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $207,016 over 2y, 27% of budgetChrist Clinic: $207,015 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetPOWER TO DECIDE: $164,801 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $131,847 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGET UP PROJECT: $104,784 over 2y, 20% of budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $97,810 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTH AND EDUCATION FOR ALL INC: $89,084 over 2y, 35% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC: $84,806 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $82,096 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHealth for All Inc: $70,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetThe Multi-Cultural Health Institute: $67,940 over 1y, 39% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $62,549 over 1y, 10% of budgetMedGlobal Inc: $42,758 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED HOUMA NATION INC: $40,464 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetACCESS TO RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE INC: $40,214 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH: $33,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPREMIER MOBILE HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $28,115 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetVERY IMPORTANT PROJECTS FUND: $26,052 over 1y, 22% of budgetASOCIACION DE SALUD PRIMARIA DE PUERTO RICO INC: $9,455 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation…National Association …Direct ReliefHeart to Heart Intern…MAP International IncSostento IncJohns Hopkins Univers…Jhpiego CorporationJsi Research & Traini…Cvs FoundationConrad N Hilton Found…Greater Houston Commu…
Americares Foundation IncCT35.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Direct Relief · Heart to Heart International Inc · MAP International Inc · Sostento Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Jhpiego Corporation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Cvs Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • Management Sciences for Health Inc: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Project Hope - the People-To-People Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home