· Public charity
Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they serve; strengthening and improving health systems; providing disaster and humanitarian relief and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $952,144 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $21,441,980 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,489,836 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $507k
- $250k+1 grant · $374k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL LLC | $374,436 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO | $180,130 |
| THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE | $132,061 |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC | $117,608 |
| IBNISINA FOUNDATION | $77,665 |
| ACCESS TO RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE | $34,961 |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC | $14,239 |
| CREATIVE WAYS THERAPY | $12,000 |
| SOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER | $9,044 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $21M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION
Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION
Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION
Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION
Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION
Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION
Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN REGION
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $518k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS2× · 2022–2023 · $664k · revenue +69% · 66% of their budget
- ISIBN SINA FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $559k · revenue +11%
- SCSWLA CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICES2× · 2022–2023 · $461k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- FAFLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INCone grant, 2022 · $2.3M · revenue +8%
ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $973k · revenue +42%- PSPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONALone grant, 2018 · $833k · revenue -42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.
To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Bmhc is a no wrong-door safety net program for men of color. our patients receive a head-to-toe assessment to address all possible concerns which will inform our health care professionals of the current state of your health. any validated…
Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…
Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).
To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.
Medical care and healthcare related support and education to under served or marginalized people throughout the world.
Healthcare Access Worldwide, Inc. (HAWI) is the first of its kind, comprehensive healthcare resource center. This is a place where all issues pertaining to health, wellness and disease can be discussed freely and openly. HAWI continues to…
HtW was created to assists prisons in resource poor countries test treat and implement measures to control and stop the spread of contagious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, other STI's, TB, Cholera, COVID-19 and other emerging infectious…
To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health for All Inc and the most unlike its peers is Very Important Projects Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS ↗
- Who funds MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds IBN SINA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SWLA CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds SRD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds BEXAR COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Lone Star Assoc Charitable Clinics ↗
- Who funds SMITHVILLE COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Christ Clinic ↗
- Who funds POWER TO DECIDE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds GET UP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH AND EDUCATION FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
- Who funds The Multi-Cultural Health Institute ↗
- Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MedGlobal Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOUMA NATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS TO RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Direct Relief · Heart to Heart International Inc · MAP International Inc · Sostento Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Jhpiego Corporation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Cvs Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Management Sciences for Health Inc — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.