How much did PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE grant in FY2024?

PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE reported 9 grants totaling $21,441,980 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE based?

PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE is based in DC.

PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they serve; strengthening and improving health systems; providing disaster and humanitarian relief and…

$21M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$374k

Largest

01What you fund

0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$8.2MInternational$1.8MHuman Services$1.4MCommunity Improvement$433kEducation$245kYouth Development$26kOther$5.6M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

implementation

2019

implementation

2020

global heath

2021

childrenmedglobalcriticalvulnerable aroundfreerefugeeshealthcare

2022

tribaluninsuredhomelessfoodshelterclothingrisk

2023

sams membersprofessionaleducationalcrisis plantplant seedsseeds sustainablesustainable syria

2024

ensure medicallyunderserved accessaccess affordableaffordable caremedically underservedculturallyknowledge

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k3 grants · $61k
$50k–250k4 grants · $507k
$250k+1 grant · $374k

$77,665

Median grant

States reached

$76M

Total assets

Largest grants

ARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL LLC$374,436
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$180,130
THE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE$132,061
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC$117,608
IBNISINA FOUNDATION$77,665
ACCESS TO RACIAL AND CULTURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE$34,961
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC$14,239
CREATIVE WAYS THERAPY$12,000
SOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER$9,044

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.5M · 23 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +110% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.5M

$7.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%

+26%

Still filing today

74%

85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $518k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GC
GEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK
2× · 2022–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +317% · 72% of their budget
AA
ALABAMA ASSOCIATION OF FREE CHARITABLE CLINICS (ALAAFCC)
2× · 2022–2023 · $664k · revenue +1150% · 66% of their budget
IF
IBNISINA FOUNDATION
4× · 2021–2024 · $559k · revenue +110%

Funded once

FA
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICSgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $2.3M · revenue +33%
HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONALgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $973k · revenue +83%
PS
POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL
one grant, 2018 · $833k · revenue -48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Global Health Council

Global health council is the leading membership organization supporting and connecting advocates, implementers, and stakeholders around global health priorities worldwide. the global health council, inc. (the "council"ghc") was…

International

One Patient - Global Health

Provide primary health care in underserviced populations without discrimination

Health

Global Health Teams

Medical care and healthcare related support and education to under served or marginalized people throughout the world.

Unclassified

Forward in Health Inc

To provide health care in under privileged countries

—

Access Health Africa

Access Health Africa's medical service programming focuses on community-level interventions. Due to the decentralized nature of life in Malawi and the overburdened formal health sector, effective interventions happen at the community level…

Human Services

South Asian Public Health Association

Health

African American Mens Health Clinic

Bmhc is a "no wrong-door safety net program for men of color." our patients receive a head-to-toe assessment to address all possible concerns which will inform our health care professionals of the current state of your health. any…

Health

Oneworld Health

To provide quality, affordable healthcare to people in need.

International

Health Markets Policy Network

Education and networking organization to promote fellowship and collaboration among health care leaders who studyeffects of health care policy on the health care marketplace. The organization will promote their work and engage media t…

Health

The Global Micro-Clinic Project

To improve how major health andcommunity development challenges are researched, prevented, and managed worldwide.

Health

Healthcare Unity Group Inc

Healthcare unity group inc was founded upon principal that everyone deserves access to healthcare hug s programs are based around hiv treatment and prevention. hug offers free medical care free laboratory testing .

Health

Spring Branch Community Health Center

Spring branch community health center (sbchc) reduces area health disparities by creating neighborhood-based health centers to provide comprehensive primary health care services that are culturally competent, linguistically appropriate,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health for All Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/46

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/35

Grantees still filing

29/35

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$8,226,776Other$5,591,729International$1,840,977Human Services$1,357,468Community Improvement$433,315Education$245,143Youth Development$26,052

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation IncCT35.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · National Association of Free And · Direct Relief · Johns Hopkins University · Jhpiego Corporation · Sostento Inc · Family Health International Inc · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Path · Cvs Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 800100336 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GEORGIA CHARITABLE CARE NETWORK, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 72% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Project Hope - the People-To-People?

Find your warmest path to Project Hope - the People-To-People through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Project Hope - the People-To-People?

More from the funding graph

PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Project Hope - the People-To-People?

More from the funding graph