Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Pitcairn-Crabbe Foundation

To provide grants through approved institutions, organizations and individuals for religious and church work, for christian education, for community welfare, and generally, for the relief of distress and the improvement of the spiritual and material condition of humanity, especially in the commonwealth of pennsylvania.

$590k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$1.0MReligion$425kFood & Nutrition$358kYouth Development$275kHealth$271kCommunity Improvement$270kEducation$250kHousing & Shelter$212kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $588k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$35,000
HOSANNA HOUSE INC$30,000
ANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC$30,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$30,000
PITTSBURGH CONSERVATION CORPS$25,000
LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC$25,000
THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY$25,000
FOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORP$25,000
SOJOURNER HOUSE INC$25,000
WEST END POWER$25,000
HOSANNA INDUSTRIES INC$25,000
URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION$25,000
OPEN HAND MINISTRIES$25,000
LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
OFF THE FLOOR PITTSBURGH$20,256
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%strong women strong girls inc: $25k → 16%Beverly's Birthdays: $20k → 10%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $15k → 10%STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS: $25k → 11%BRIDGES COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $10k → 16%Beverly's Birthdays: $8k → 10%OFF THE FLOOR PITTSBURGH: $20k → 11%STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS: $20k → 11%East End Cooperative Ministry: $30k → 11%East End Cooperative Ministry: $30k → 11%East End Cooperative Ministry: $30k → 11%East End Cooperative Ministry: $30k → 11%Jeremiah's Place: $30k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $30k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $30k → 11%JEREMIAH'S PLACE: $25k → 11%Jeremiah's Place Pittsburgh Relief Nursery: $25k → 11%FAMILYLINKS: $10k → 11%The Watson Institute: $25k → 11%WATSON INSTITUTE: $20k → 11%Foundation of HOPE: $13k → 11%Presbyterian Seniorcare: $25k → 11%Northern Area Multi Service Center of Allegheny Co: $25k → 11%Foundation of HOPE: $25k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 11%Urban Impact Foundation: $25k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $15k → 11%Woodlands Foundation Inc: $20k → 11%Pennsylvania Women Work: $25k → 11%LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 11%Pennsylvania Women Work: $23k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $15k → 11%Community Human Services Corporation: $13k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%crisis Center North Incorporation: $25k → 11%Allegheny Family Network: $25k → 11%Allegheny Family Network: $25k → 11%Women's Center and Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh: $30k → 11%Outreach Teen & Family Services Inc: $18k → 11%PITTSBURGH CONSERVATION CORPS: $25k → 11%PITTSBURGH CONSERVATION CORPS: $25k → 11%Western Pennsylvania Diaper Bank: $10k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $10k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $20k → 11%WOMANSPACE EAST INC: $12k → 11%JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 37 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
37

Total granted

$2.4M
$771k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+29%

Still filing today

86%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $213k · revenue +91%
  • HH
    HOSANNA HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +17%
  • EE
    EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $180k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SP
    SHADYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $83k
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +35%
  • MF
    MACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Community Services Inc

Provide programs to help individuals and/or families achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
2
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
3
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
4
Pathways Pa Inc

To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…

Human Services
5
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
6
Pittsylvania County Community Action Inc

To increase awareness about poverty and to promote comprehensive approaches to eliminate conditions that cause poverty and improve the quality of life in communities throughout the service area.

—
7
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
8
Life'swork of Western Pennsylvania

We partner with people with disabilities, people with other barriers, young adults, children, and families to pursue their hopes and dreams through strengthening workplace abilities, building life skills, and developing meaningful…

—
9
Casa of Allegheny County

To recruit and train community members to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
10
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
11
Pittsburgh Housing Development Corp

To initiate, plan, finance, develop and manage housing development in the City of Pittsburgh, and upon request, in other municipalities with particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on such development in low to moderate income census…

Housing & Shelter
12
Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hosanna House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Growing Up Greene. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyK-12 Schools and Early Chil…Regional Economic Developme…Faith-Based Educational Org…Member Recreation ClubsArts & Cultural Organizatio…Healthcare & Medical Servic…Family Philanthropic Founda…Affordable Senior HousingInstitutional Support TrustsSenior Residential CareCharitable Trusts and Found…Community Support ServicesBehavioral Health & Recover…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%1%<5yr12%11%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr21%20%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%1%<5yr12%8%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr21%22%20–35yr16%38%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/96
the rest of the field
8%
764/9,810

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/84
Grantees still filing
66/84
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY — $180,000 · Human ServicesEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRYJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY — $80,000 · Human ServicesJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIE…URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Human ServicesURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATIONGIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $70,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGHPENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK — $62,500 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORKPITTSBURGH CONSERVATION CORPS — $50,000 · Human ServicesALLEGHENY FAMILY NETWORK — $50,000 · Human ServicesWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE WATSON INSTITUTE — $45,000 · Human ServicesBEVERLY'S PGH — $43,250 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF HOPE INC — $37,500 · Human Services+17 more — $308,046 · Human Services+17 moreSHADYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $83,000 · OtherSHADYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHAllegheny County Assistance Office — $64,000 · OtherAllegheny County Assistance OfficeFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $62,000 · OtherANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC — $60,000 · OtherFAITH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF FOX CHAPEL — $57,500 · OtherPITTSBURGH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE UTD PREBY CHRC UTD STS AMER — $50,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $46,000 · OtherSAMARITAN CENTER — $45,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $73,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSB…ACH Clear Pathways — $50,000 · OtherFORBES AVENUE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc — $50,000 · Other+25 more — $509,000 · Other+25 moreGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $212,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER P…412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $40,000 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD …COMMUNITY KITCHEN PITTSBURGH — $25,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY…LIVING STONES — $15,000 · Food & NutritionGarfield Community Farm Inc — $15,000 · Food & NutritionFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $70,000 · Community ImprovementFOCUS ON …UNION PROJECT — $60,000 · Community ImprovementUNION PRO…Catapult Greater Pittsburgh — $55,000 · Community ImprovementCatapult …REPAIR THE WORLD — $50,000 · Community ImprovementREPAIR TH…The Pittsburgh Project — $40,000 · Community ImprovementThe Pitts…MACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementMACEDONIA…HOSANNA HOUSE INC — $210,000 · ReligionHOSANNA H…Open Hand Ministries Inc — $55,000 · ReligionOpen Hand…SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $20,000 · ReligionSOUTH HIL…THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $80,000 · EducationIMANI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $40,000 · EducationWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF — $25,000 · EducationLITERACY PITTSBURGH — $25,000 · EducationTHE LEARNING LAMP INC — $20,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR REFUGEE YOUTH SUPPORT AND EDUCATION — $10,000 · EducationTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $110,000 · PhilanthropyMELTING POT MINISTRIES — $37,500 · PhilanthropyNORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $15,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$1,046,296Other$1,199,500Food & Nutrition$307,500Community Improvement$300,000Religion$285,000Education$200,000Philanthropy$162,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $212,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOSANNA HOUSE INC — $210,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY — $180,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $110,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $80,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY — $80,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $73,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $70,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetGIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $70,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK — $62,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC — $60,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetUNION PROJECT — $60,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetOpen Hand Ministries Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetCatapult Greater Pittsburgh — $55,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetACH Clear Pathways — $50,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetFORBES AVENUE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetPITTSBURGH CONSERVATION CORPS — $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALLEGHENY FAMILY NETWORK — $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WATSON INSTITUTE — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN CENTER — $45,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH — $43,250 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetThe Pittsburgh Project — $40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIMANI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMELTING POT MINISTRIES — $37,500 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetFOUNDATION OF HOPE INC — $37,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF W PA — $36,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN PITTSBURGH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPITTSBURGH LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTHY START INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPresbyterian SeniorCare — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS PLACE OF WASHINGTON BOULEVARD — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCRISIS CENTER NORTH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE SOCIETY TO PRESERVE THE MILLVALE MURALS OF MAXO VANKA — $25,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetKNEAD COMMUNITY CAFE — $25,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetHosanna Industries Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFranklin Center of Beaver County — $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetOFF THE FLOOR PITTSBURGH — $20,256 over 2y, 6.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…The United Way of Sou…The Grable FoundationStaunton Farm Foundat…The Heinz EndowmentsRichard King Mellon F…The Jack Buncher Foun…Opportunity FoundationSnee-Reinhardt Charit…Howard & Nell E Mille…
Community Foundation of Greater JohnstownPA123.3× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Johnstown · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Grable Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Opportunity Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pitcairn-Crabbe Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pitcairn-Crabbe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pitcairn-Crabbe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home