Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peter & Elizabeth Cohn Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$792kArts & Culture$262kRecreation & Sports$207kHuman Services$150kHealth$86kAnimals$66kEnvironment$46kCivil Rights$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$50,000
BALLET X$25,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY$25,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WILD BIRD FUND$5,000
OAKWOOD SCHOOL ADVANCEMENT OFFICE$5,000
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$5,000
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE$5,000
CITY YEAR LOS ANGELES$5,000
SHE RECOVERS FOUNDATION$4,000
CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES$2,500
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ORKEESWA INC: $1k → 13%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $2k → 18%HEATH VILLAGE: $4k → 7%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICE: $1k → 10%HEATH VILLAGE: $2k → 7%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $5k → 14%HEATH VILLAGE: $1k → 7%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%HEATH VILLAGE: $1k → 7%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICE: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICE: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500 → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500 → 10%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $3k → 17%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500 → 10%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PR: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PR: $1k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $25k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED: $25k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED: $25k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $25k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED: $25k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
VA
DE
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 49 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
19

Total granted

$1.7M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+18%

Still filing today

59%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $500k · revenue +5%
  • TN
    The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations
    9× · 2017–2025 · $226k · revenue +76%
  • B
    BALLETX
    9× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • VI
    VETPAW INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -15%
  • RT
    RISING TREETOPS AT OAKHURST
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +8%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is She Recovers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
29/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Trustees of Princeton University: $500,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $226,000 · EducationThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Ti…+3 more: $14,500 · EducationCENTRAL PARK: $50,000 · OtherCENTRAL PARKIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLOR OF CHANGE: $30,000 · OtherCOLOR OF CHANGEUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONREHOBOTH BEACH SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB: $20,250 · OtherBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY: $19,000 · OtherPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · OtherPABLOVE FOUNDATION INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · Other+40 more: $181,000 · Other+40 moreBALLETX: $162,500 · Arts & CultureBALLETXTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $62,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PENNSYLVAN…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesFUND FOR T…CHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth Services: $7,500 · Human ServicesHEATH VILLAGE INC: $7,500 · Human Services+5 more: $12,000 · Human Services+5 moreCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL P…+2 more: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsSHE RECOVERS FOUNDATION: $18,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $9,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $5,000 · HealthBAYHEALTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $3,250 · HealthWILD BIRD FUND INC: $20,000 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife: $20,000 · Animals
Education$740,500Other$427,750Arts & Culture$230,000Human Services$169,500Recreation & Sports$157,000Health$55,250Animals$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $500,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $226,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBALLETX: $162,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $135,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $62,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWILD BIRD FUND INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY: $19,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSHE RECOVERS FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOPE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER: $11,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC: $7,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $7,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEATH VILLAGE INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVETPAW INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRISING TREETOPS AT OAKHURST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTBLUE CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY K FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWRITERS GUILD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVALENTINO ACHAK DENG FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBAYHEALTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $3,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPTOWN SOCCER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $725 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds BALLETX ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE AGED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PABLOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD BIRD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SHE RECOVERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COPE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds HEATH VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds VETPAW INC ↗
  • Who funds RISING TREETOPS AT OAKHURST ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peter & Elizabeth Cohn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peter & Elizabeth Cohn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc: 26% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Bayhealth Foundation Corporation: 4% of income from government
  • Harry K Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Heath Village Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peter & Elizabeth Cohn Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Peter & Elizabeth Cohn Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter & Elizabeth Cohn’s filings →

More from the funding graph