Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Peace Development Fund

Promotion of Peace and Social Justice.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$274k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Civil Rights$7.9MCrime & Legal$4.3MInternational$3.7MCommunity Improvement$1.5MEnvironment$1.4MArts & Culture$914kEducation$910kFood & Nutrition$732kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 63 grants below total $2,143,136 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,339,110 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $195,974 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $179k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $535k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $274k
$10,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Womens Intl League for Peac$274,413
Individual grant recipient$189,625
Peoples Justice Project Grou$180,875
Heart and Hand Fund$129,497
Friends of Taghyeer Movemen$121,624
Otros Mundos Chiapas$100,000
Beloved Economies$80,706
The Vow from Hiroshima$80,475
The Black Sex Worker Collecti$73,183
DecrimSex Work CA$71,225
Lighthouse Foundation of Chic$69,685
Trans Asylum Seeker Support N$58,284
Individual grant recipient$43,938
Western Mass Asylum Support$40,655
Decarcerate WMass Bailout P$40,179
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $310k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Seeds of Harmony Inc: $7k → 28%Rosenberg Fund for Children: $6k → 12%The Afiya Center: $25k → 14%Sanctuary In The City: $25k → 10%Southern Partners Fund Inc: $50k → 13%The Parasol Cooperative: $12k → 5%Susu CommUNITY Farm: $10k → 11%Western Montanta Gay and Lesbian: $6k → 9%PaLante Transformative Justi: $25k → 17%YWCA: $5k → 12%Immigrant Legal Resource Cent: $15k → 10%RIP Medical Debt: $10k → 9%Power to Decide: $6k → 14%Camps in Common: $34k → 10%Camps in Common: $27k → 10%Camps in Common: $14k → 10%Camps in Common: $7k → 10%Camps in Common: $7k → 10%Camps in Common: $5k → 10%Camps in Common: $5k → 10%Possibility Labs: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
WV
VA
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 86 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

86 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
144

Total granted

$22M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+21%

Still filing today

51%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $810k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION OF CHICAGOLAND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $886k · revenue +196% · 64% of their budget
  • JA
    JANE ADDAMS PEACE ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $780k · revenue +116% · 98% of their budget
  • EJ
    EDUCATION JUSTICE COALITION OF VT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $481k · revenue +52% · 80% of their budget

Funded once

  • TP
    The Prison Birth Project
    one grant, 2017 · $235k
  • PN
    Project Nadiya Incorporated
    one grant, 2023 · $227k · 77% of their budget
  • BB
    BAY-Peace Better Alternatives for
    one grant, 2017 · $139k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
3
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
4
Corporate Accountability Lab

The Organization unleashes the creative potential of the law to protect people and the planet from corporate abuse.

International
5
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
6
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
7
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
8
The Conversationalist
—
9
Center for Contemporary Documentation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Civil Liberties Defense Center

CIVIL LIBERTIES DEFENSE CENTER (CLDC) educates the general public about their rights and privileges under the US Constitution and provides free legal support to climate and social justice activists.

Civil Rights
11
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
12
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Circumpolar Conservation Union. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsChristian Youth CampsCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Development ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsLgbtq+ Community SupportCancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Food Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr14%23%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%42%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 42% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/256
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,309

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

176 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 176 of the 264 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
59
Early backer (in before they grew)
170/176
Grantees still filing
101/176
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Beloved Economies — $1,931,585 · OtherBeloved EconomiesWHOSE KNOWLEDGE — $1,842,342 · OtherWHOSE KNOWLEDGERestoring Justice for Indigenous — $1,682,139 · OtherRestoring Justice for IndigenousFriends of Taghyeer Movement — $1,328,228 · OtherFriends of Taghyeer MovementHeart and Hand Fund — $1,029,566 · OtherHeart and Hand FundPeoples Justice Project Grou — $802,353 · OtherInsight-Out — $679,662 · OtherSouthern Farm Lab — $631,977 · Other+132 more — $7,769,188 · Other+132 moreWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI — $1,398,931 · InternationalWOMEN CROSS …JANE ADDAMS PEACE ASSOCIATION INC — $779,917 · InternationalJANE ADDAMS …Project Nadiya Incorporated — $227,156 · InternationalProject Nadi…CAMBRIDGE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CONSULTANTS — $95,982 · International+8 more — $364,191 · International+8 moreI AM WHY INC — $1,143,480 · Youth DevelopmentENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP — $66,000 · Youth DevelopmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $394,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL JUSTICE ECOLOGY PROJECT INC — $177,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $176,000 · EnvironmentCIRCUMPOLAR CONSERVATION UNION — $130,500 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE — $68,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY — $50,000 · Environment+11 more — $136,843 · EnvironmentLIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION OF CHICAGOLAND — $885,866 · Arts & CultureJustice Committee Inc — $81,000 · Arts & CultureYouth Outreach And Learning Institute — $50,875 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $102,997 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION JUSTICE COALITION OF VT — $480,819 · EducationWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE FOR PEACE & FREEDOM UNO INC — $267,500 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $29,130 · Education+4 more — $85,600 · EducationWORTH RISES INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $125,000 · Civil RightsWhose Knowledge Question Mark — $92,500 · Civil RightsCHANGING WORLDS — $67,500 · Civil RightsAPIARY FOR PRACTICAL SUPPORT INC — $25,000 · Civil RightsTHE AFRICAN AMERICAN POLICY FORUM INC — $25,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE — $20,492 · Civil Rights+4 more — $48,665 · Civil Rights
Other$17,697,040International$2,866,177Youth Development$1,209,480Environment$1,132,843Arts & Culture$1,120,738Education$863,049Civil Rights$604,157

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI — $1,398,931 over 5y, 73% of budgetI AM WHY INC — $1,143,480 over 4y, 93% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION OF CHICAGOLAND — $885,866 over 4y, 64% of budgetJANE ADDAMS PEACE ASSOCIATION INC — $779,917 over 9y, 98% of budgetEDUCATION JUSTICE COALITION OF VT — $480,819 over 4y, 80% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $394,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPI-TAP INC — $329,976 over 2y, 75% of budgetWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE FOR PEACE & FREEDOM UNO INC — $267,500 over 2y, 19% of budgetProject Nadiya Incorporated — $227,156 over 1y, 77% of budgetWORTH RISES INC — $200,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetGLOBAL JUSTICE ECOLOGY PROJECT INC — $177,500 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $176,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $160,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCUMPOLAR CONSERVATION UNION — $130,500 over 3y, 74% of budgetCENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $125,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetRESIST INC — $104,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCamps in Common — $99,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetCAMBRIDGE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CONSULTANTS — $95,982 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $94,888 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $92,616 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWhose Knowledge Question Mark — $92,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWOMEN DONORS NETWORK — $83,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJustice Committee Inc — $81,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetPeace Development Fund — $75,575 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $71,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $68,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGING WORLDS — $67,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP — $66,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTanka Fund — $65,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetTogether in Service — $63,139 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $60,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetYouth Outreach And Learning Institute — $50,875 over 1y, 48% of budgetCENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY — $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSuccess Stories Program — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetNORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC — $40,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetLA COCINA — $40,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWomen's Earth and Climate Action Network — $40,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCHANGE LABS — $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $39,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC — $36,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE HUNGER FUND — $35,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetIMPACT INC — $33,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetThe Coalition of Immokalee Workers Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMEN CROSS DMZ Attn CATHI CHOI ↗
  • Who funds I AM WHY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION OF CHICAGOLAND ↗
  • Who funds JANE ADDAMS PEACE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION JUSTICE COALITION OF VT ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PI-TAP INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE FOR PEACE & FREEDOM UNO INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Nadiya Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds WORTH RISES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL JUSTICE ECOLOGY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRCUMPOLAR CONSERVATION UNION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Common Counsel Founda…Proteus Fund IncBen & Jerry's Foundat…Rsf Social Finance IncBorealis PhilanthropySocial and Environmen…NEO Philanthropy IncSolidaire Network IncSolidago FoundationWindward FundTides Foundation
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC50× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Solidaire Network Inc · Solidago Foundation · Windward Fund · Tides Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peace Development Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Collaborative Resolutions Group Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Palante Transformative Justice Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Root Social Justice Center Inc — 42% of income from government
  • Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Impact Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Out in the Open Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Susu Community Farm Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Education Justice Coalition of Vt — 9% of income from government
  • The Nolumbeka Project Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Transformative Culture Project Inc F/K/a Press Pass Tv Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Nueva Esperanza Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Nuestras Raices Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Ourspace World Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Migrant Justice Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peace Development Fund?

Find your warmest path to Peace Development Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 264 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines