Skip to content
Path at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Path

PATH is a non-profit with a mission to end homelessness for individuals, families, and communities across california by helping those in need with temporary housing, permanent housing, and providing supportive services to help clients remain housed.

$5.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$15MHuman Services$4.2MCrime & Legal$4.1MEducation$2.3MHealth$1.4MFood & Nutrition$857kPhilanthropy$679kPublic Benefit$281kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $4,947,347, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,893,006 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $945,659 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $696k
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.3M
$298,052
Median grant
1
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT PEOPLE$1,381,871
HAMBURGER HOME DBA AVIVA FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES$1,286,916
LOAVES AND FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN$622,926
SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH$342,042
INNER CITY LAW CENTER$319,946
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$298,052
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC$243,932
QME PLACE INC$170,139
LOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CETNERS$133,138
CENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC$76,250
FATHER JOES VILLAGES$72,135
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $32k → 11%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $21k → 11%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $625k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $558k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $556k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $342k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $270k → 14%WHITTIER FIRST DAY: $636k → 14%WHITTIER FIRST DAY: $561k → 14%WHITTIER FIRST DAY: $453k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $211k → 14%WHITTIER FIRST DAY: $417k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $79k → 14%WHITTIER FIRST DAY: $344k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $30k → 14%WHITTIER AREA FIRST DAY COALITION: $333k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 22 repeat orgs$459k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$28M
$459k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+254%

Still filing today

91%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    ABODE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
    4× · 2021–2025 · $4.5M · revenue +52%
  • HH
    HAMBURGER HOME
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +5%
  • HY
    Helpline Youth Counseling Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.8M · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • OP
    Our Place Housing Solutions
    one grant, 2017 · $331k
  • HI
    HARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $46k · revenue +254%
  • HW
    HOUSING WORKSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +260%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Inland Temporary Homes

Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…

—
2
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
3
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
4
Westside Community Mental Health Center Westside Community Services Inc

The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.

Health
5
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
6
Fair Housing Foundation

The fair housing foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to the elimination of discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
Shine Bc-La

Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.

Education
10
Alameda County Homeless Action Center

HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…

Housing & Shelter
11
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
12
Lafh Permanent Housing Corp

Lafh permanent housing corp. i (casa central) has been established to own a 6-unit complex located in los angeles, california, which provides permanent housing for families with low income.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Works; the most unlike its peers is Our Place Housing Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABODE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT: $4,476,376 · Housing & ShelterABODE PROPERTY MANAGEMENTPATH VENTURES: $2,993,351 · Housing & ShelterPATH VENTURESCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC: $341,604 · Housing & Shelter+4 more: $164,511 · Housing & ShelterWhittier Area First Day Coalition: $2,744,402 · Human ServicesWhittier Area First D…SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $2,350,796 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH …THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $320,301 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWO…+1 more: $53,158 · Human ServicesHAMBURGER HOME: $2,830,127 · EducationHAMBURGER HOMEKINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER: $2,440,442 · EducationKINGDOM CAUSES BELLF…Helpline Youth Counseling Inc: $2,809,790 · Crime & LegalHelpline Youth Cou…Inner City Law Center: $1,845,976 · Crime & LegalInner City Law Cen…Interfaith Community Services Inc: $827,014 · OtherInterfaith C…LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $659,076 · OtherLA FAMILY HO…CITY OF LONG BEACH: $388,036 · OtherCITY OF LONG…Our Place Housing Solutions: $331,122 · OtherOur Place Ho…ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $301,843 · OtherST VINCENT D…QME PLACE INC: $291,250 · OtherQME PLACE IN…VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO: $281,442 · OtherVIETNAM VETE…+3 more: $92,277 · OtherFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC: $934,202 · HealthLOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS: $435,722 · Health+1 more: $2,232 · HealthLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $857,249 · Food & Nutrition
Housing & Shelter$7,975,842Human Services$5,468,657Education$5,270,569Crime & Legal$4,655,766Other$3,172,060Health$1,372,156Food & Nutrition$857,249

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABODE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT: $4,476,376 over 4y, 15% of budgetPATH VENTURES: $2,993,351 over 2y, 23% of budgetHAMBURGER HOME: $2,830,127 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetHelpline Youth Counseling Inc: $2,809,790 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetWhittier Area First Day Coalition: $2,744,402 over 6y, 53% of budgetKINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER: $2,440,442 over 6y, 36% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $2,350,796 over 5y, 13% of budgetInner City Law Center: $1,845,976 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC: $934,202 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $857,249 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc: $827,014 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $659,076 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS: $435,722 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC: $341,604 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $320,301 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $301,843 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetQME PLACE INC: $291,250 over 2y, 34% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO: $281,442 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPALS N PETS INC: $66,297 over 2y, 71% of budgetLAMP INC: $64,920 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $53,158 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $46,475 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOUSING WORKS: $33,441 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetASCENCIA: $18,298 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMCALISTER INSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT & EDUCATION INC: $2,232 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Community …Shelter Partnership I…United Way IncThe Rose Hills Founda…The Ralph M Parsons F…The Ahmanson Foundati…Weingart FoundationSempra FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…Conrad N Hilton Found…The California Endowm…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA31.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · United Way Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The California Endowment

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Path funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Path. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Path’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home