· Public charity
Path
PATH is a non-profit with a mission to end homelessness for individuals, families, and communities across california by helping those in need with temporary housing, permanent housing, and providing supportive services to help clients remain housed.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $4,947,347 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,893,006 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $945,659 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k5 grants · $696k
- $250k+6 grants · $4.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT PEOPLE | $1,381,871 |
| HAMBURGER HOME DBA AVIVA FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES | $1,286,916 |
| LOAVES AND FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN | $622,926 |
| SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH | $342,042 |
| INNER CITY LAW CENTER | $319,946 |
| INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES | $298,052 |
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC | $243,932 |
| QME PLACE INC | $170,139 |
| LOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CETNERS | $133,138 |
| CENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC | $76,250 |
| FATHER JOES VILLAGES | $72,135 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APABODE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT4× · 2021–2025 · $4.5M · revenue +52%
- HHHAMBURGER HOME2× · 2024–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +5%
- HYHelpline Youth Counseling Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $2.8M · revenue +201%
Funded once
- OPOur Place Housing Solutionsone grant, 2017 · $331k
- HIHARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $46k · revenue +254%
- HWHOUSING WORKSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +260%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.
We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.
Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…
The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.
The fair housing foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to the elimination of discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone.
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.
Lafh permanent housing corp. i (casa central) has been established to own a 6-unit complex located in los angeles, california, which provides permanent housing for families with low income.
The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.
HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…
To enhance the lives of people with developmental and other disabilities by creating quality, affordable housing options.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Works and the most unlike its peers is Our Place Housing Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ABODE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds PATH VENTURES ↗
- Who funds HAMBURGER HOME ↗
- Who funds Helpline Youth Counseling Inc ↗
- Who funds Whittier Area First Day Coalition ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Inner City Law Center ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds QME PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds PALS N PETS INC ↗
- Who funds LAMP INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HARBOR INTERFAITH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING WORKS ↗
- Who funds ASCENCIA ↗
- Who funds MCALISTER INSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT & EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · United Way Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The California Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Path funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.