· Public charity
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc
For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $5,745,511 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $35,558,386 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,812,875 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+8 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL | $903,858 |
| POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL | $673,595 |
| INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC | $650,872 |
| INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION | $530,387 |
| IPAS | $459,885 |
| ENGENDER HEALTH INC | $349,907 |
| CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES - UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS | $344,914 |
| JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $324,829 |
| FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL | $228,501 |
| PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY IN HEALTH | $191,159 |
| ELIZABETH GLAZER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION DBA EGPAF | $180,697 |
| TALAMUS HEALTH INC | $177,342 |
| TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $171,190 |
| THE RAND CORPORATION | $156,245 |
| MALARIA NO MORE | $108,952 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $651k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $29M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: HEALTH
Stated purpose: HEALTH
Stated purpose: HEALTH
Stated purpose: HEALTH
Stated purpose: HEALTH
Stated purpose: HEALTH
Stated purpose: HEALTH
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -7% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPATH5× · 2019–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +20%
- EIENGENDERHEALTH INC3× · 2022–2024 · $875k · revenue +96%
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND4× · 2018–2023 · $653k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- MCMCKINSEY & COMPANY INCone grant, 2019 · $650k
- AIASSIST INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2023 · $510k · revenue +19%
- ZAZS ASSOCIATES INCone grant, 2021 · $331k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.
Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
Orbis builds strong and sustainable eye care systems globally that put treatment and prevention within reach
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meningitis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds WATSI INC ↗
- Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds IPAS ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ASSIST INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds MALARIA NO MORE FUND ↗
- Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Path · Family Health International Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Jhpiego Corporation · Skoll Fund · The Skoll Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · The End Fund Inc · Mulago Foundation · United Nations Foundation Inc · The George Washington University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc — 76% of income from government
- Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.