Skip to content
Path at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Path

PATH makes good health more accessible in 70+ countries by improving the health care people receive, creating affordable health products, and advancing effective health policies.

$73M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$100MInternational$48MScience & Tech$9.9MEducation$6.5MCommunity Improvement$2.4MYouth Development$440kEnvironment$345kPhilanthropy$127kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 40 grants below total $12,366,968, the rows itemized in this filing. The $73,175,596 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,808,628 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $281k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+11 grants · $10M
$96,216
Median grant
15
States reached
$382M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE$1,772,283
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY DBA NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$1,769,405
JHPIEGO$1,244,119
JSI RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE INC$1,135,026
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ( UW )$1,097,310
HJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC$981,270
OPENMRS INC$742,446
POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC$457,027
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CDC$296,623
TULANE UNIVERSITY$291,939
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$261,708
CODAGENIX INC$223,915
ICF MACRO INC$204,094
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$185,467
WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH$177,788
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%METRICS FOR MANAGEMENT: $166k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $61M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$28M · 46% · 88 grants

Stated purpose: AFRICA · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$15M · 25% · 24 grants

Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

East Asia and the Pacific$8.2M · 14% · 29 grants

Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · AMEE

Central America and the Caribbean$3.8M · 6% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS

South Asia$3.0M · 5% · 18 grants

Stated purpose: AMEE, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · AMEE · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS

Russia and Neighboring States$1.7M · 3% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: AMEE · AMEE, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$463k · 1% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS

South America$281k · 0% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH PROGRAMS · PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Middle East and North Africa$52k · 0% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159M · 107 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

107 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 81 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
51

Total granted

$159M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+15%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationScience & TechEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10M · revenue +24%
  • AB
    Albert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +342%
  • RI
    Regenstrief Institute Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2.1M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1.4M
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    one grant, 2024 · $660k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Path

Path makes good health more accessible in 70+ countries by improving the health care people receive, creating affordable health products, and advancing effective health policies. across all our projects and programs, (continued on schedule…

International
2
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
5
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
6
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
7
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
8
Medstar Health Research Institute Inc

See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.

—
9
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
10
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
11
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action; the most unlike its peers is Gates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
91/97
Grantees still filing
59/97
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH: $14,592,189 · OtherWALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCHUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $13,609,356 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $7,673,190 · OtherJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INCAlbert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc: $6,188,234 · OtherAlbert B Sabin Vaccine Institute IncICF MACRO INC: $5,766,632 · OtherICF MACRO INC: $5,625,271 · OtherJHPIEGO CORPORATION: $5,310,550 · OtherPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $4,794,659 · Other+91 more: $48,746,441 · Other+91 moreHJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,226,461 · HealthHJF MEDICAL RES…OpenMRS1 Limited DBA OPENMRS INC: $3,103,627 · HealthOpenMRS1 Limite…INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,042,483 · HealthINTRAHEALTH INT…Children's Hospital Corporation: $2,621,643 · HealthChildren's Hosp…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2,066,378 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSP…Medical Care Development Inc: $1,516,849 · HealthMedical Care De…MEDIC MOBILE INC: $1,453,073 · HealthMEDIC MOBILE IN…THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,317,183 · Health+15 more: $3,369,460 · Health+15 moreRegenstrief Institute Inc: $5,068,154 · EducationRegenstrief I…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,836,776 · EducationPresident and…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $3,917,716 · EducationTHE ADMINISTR…VILLAGEREACH: $1,958,093 · EducationVILLAGEREACHNew York University: $1,769,405 · EducationNew York Univ…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $890,280 · Education+13 more: $3,397,288 · Education+13 moreCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $10,075,804 · InternationalCLINTON HEAL…WORLD VISION INC: $2,674,593 · InternationalWORLD VISION…THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $1,228,643 · InternationalTHE POPULATI…RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $985,975 · International+25 more: $5,003,638 · International+25 moreNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $684,605 · Arts & CultureResearch Triangle Institute: $415,830 · Science & TechNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $20,000 · Science & TechSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $227,626 · EnvironmentSOLAR ELECTRIC LIGHT FUND: $120,388 · Environment
Other$112,306,522Health$24,717,157Education$21,837,712International$19,968,653Arts & Culture$684,605Science & Tech$435,830Environment$348,014

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $10,075,804 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $7,673,190 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,226,461 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetAlbert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc: $6,188,234 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetJHPIEGO CORPORATION: $5,310,550 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetRegenstrief Institute Inc: $5,068,154 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,836,776 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $4,794,659 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $3,917,716 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOpenMRS1 Limited DBA OPENMRS INC: $3,103,627 over 8y, 60% of budgetINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,042,483 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,674,593 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $2,621,643 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,280,013 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2,066,378 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGEREACH: $1,958,093 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetMedical Care Development Inc: $1,516,849 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMEDIC MOBILE INC: $1,453,073 over 4y, 14% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,317,183 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $1,228,643 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetRESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $985,975 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $890,280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $699,251 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $684,605 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $659,848 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRAUNHOFER USA INC: $598,805 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $535,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $517,897 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $510,225 over 2y, 65% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $492,325 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $488,505 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEHEALTH AFRICA: $482,335 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $447,970 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe George Washington University: $427,317 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $415,830 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMAGINE HEALTH: $397,326 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetIPAS: $385,003 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $366,037 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTELEHEALTH INC: $329,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetKybele Inc: $326,540 over 3y, 32% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $325,143 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetACESO GLOBAL INC: $295,458 over 2y, 20% of budgetFamily Health International Inc: $294,444 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITAL STRATEGIES INC: $290,490 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $257,282 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $227,626 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYale University: $223,887 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $199,002 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Albert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Regenstrief Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds OpenMRS1 Limited DBA OPENMRS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGEREACH ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Medical Care Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDIC MOBILE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationJsi Research & Traini…Clinton Health Access…Johns Hopkins Univers…Family Health Interna…Gavi AlliancePopulation Services I…Trustees of Boston Un…The Rockefeller Found…President and Fellows…Mulago FoundationUnited Nations Founda…
Gates FoundationWA61.3× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Family Health International Inc · Gavi Alliance · Population Services International · Trustees of Boston University · The Rockefeller Foundation · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Mulago Foundation · United Nations Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Path funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Path. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine: 100% of income from government
  • Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Management Sciences for Health Inc: 67% of income from government
  • Jhpiego Corporation: 65% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Hjf Medical Research International Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 175 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Path’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home